Invest in the Truth Today.
Help us raise $100,000 by the end of May.

Donate

    Gov. Jerry Brown on Wednesday signed legislation that radically curbs school bond practices that have come under criticism for the last year or so.

    Brown signed AB 182, jointly sponsored by local state Sen. Ben Hueso and Democratic Assemblywoman Joan Buchanan, which places far stricter limits on the type of bond sales school and community college districts can engage in.

    The bill grew out of reporting by Detroit blogger Joel Thurtell, Voice of San Diego and the Los Angeles Times about bond deals around the state that have left taxpayers on the hook for loans with repayment amounts of more than $20 for every dollar borrowed.

    The most infamous of those deals was at the Poway Unified School District, where in 2011, officials borrowed $126 million that will ultimately cost them almost $1 billion to pay back. The deal eventually caught the attention of the New York Times, Financial Times, Washington Post, and several other news outlets.

    We outlined the four big changes introduced by the bill in this story last month. Here’s an extract:

    The bill reins in irresponsible borrowing by making four big changes.

    It forbids school districts from borrowing money over more than 25 years.

    The point of this reform is simple: It stops districts shunting debt payments far into the future. That means things like school buildings and facilities will be paid for over their useful life, instead of long after they’ve started to crumble.

    (Though the same won’t be true for bond purchases like iPads.)

    It limits the payback ratio on school and community college bonds to 4-to-1.

    There have been some really crazy deals made around the state. Districts have saddled taxpayers with loans with payback ratios of $10, $15 and even $20 for every dollar borrowed.

    AB 182 puts an end to all that.

    It requires school districts to actually tell the public what they’re doing.

    Let’s face it, the reason districts like Poway got away with their wild deals is because nobody’s been paying much attention to school bonds. The new legislation tries to combat this by requiring districts to lay out what they plan to do and how much taxpayers will have to pay, in explicit detail aired during public meetings.

    It forces districts to include escape clauses in their deals.

    One of the most controversial elements of Poway’s deal was that the district has no chance to renegotiate. AB 182 will ensure that all future bond deals (of more than 10 years) are re-financeable.

    A spokesman for California Treasurer Bill Lockyer who has been vocally opposed to the controversial school bond practices, emailed a statement this morning:


    Help Us Raise $100k By the End of May

    AB 182 corrects a fundamental unfairness.  It ensures school districts no longer can heap outrageous debt burdens on the backs of future generations of taxpayers, force them to pay for aging facilities their children won’t fully enjoy and at the same time reduce those taxpayers’ ability to finance the schools their kids need.

    The reforms are reasonable and balanced, and they won’t harm districts’ ability to meet their school construction needs.  By increasing transparency, AB 182 also helps ensure school board members and taxpayers get all the pertinent facts when underwriters and financial advisors pitch CABs.

    Lockyer told Voice of San Diego earlier this year that the people who put together Poway’s bond deal should be voted out of office or fired.

      This article relates to: Education, News, School Bonds, School Finances, School Leadership

      Written by Will Carless

      Will Carless is the former head of investigations at Voice of San Diego. He currently lives in Montevideo, Uruguay, where he is a freelance foreign correspondent and occasional contributor to VOSD. You can reach him at will.carless.work@gmail.com.

      3 comments
      Judy Neufeld-Fernandez
      Judy Neufeld-Fernandez

      Will, you are so right that no one is paying much attention to school bonds and once you do you are aghast. However, there is another topic very little are paying attention to: AB375 falsely spun as a child safety bill will silently become law Oct. 12 if Governor Brown doesn't veto it. This horrific bill, soon to be law, will limit depositions of child victims in predation cases to FIVE. For example, if it had been law with Mark Berndt "sperm feeder" teacher in LA, only five victims could be deposed, not the dozens of victims that existed. Where is the coverage on this onerous bill, Will?

      Mark Giffin
      Mark Giffin

      It is extremely unfortunate these actions were needed. The school districts treatment of district taxpayers concerning these bonds were manipulative, morally corrupt and an absolute betrayal of the public trust. They get away with this behavior because of the complacency of the general public. Sad really.

      Mark Giffin
      Mark Giffin subscribermember

      It is extremely unfortunate these actions were needed. The school districts treatment of district taxpayers concerning these bonds were manipulative, morally corrupt and an absolute betrayal of the public trust. They get away with this behavior because of the complacency of the general public. Sad really.