Facts Matter. Invest in the Truth.
Help VOSD raise $100,000 in our spring campaign.

Donate

    The Metropolitan Transit System is trying to build a new bus yard and it has nothing to do with attempts to build a downtown convadium.

    MTS has five large facilities where it stores and maintains buses around the county. Within the next 10 years, the agency will need a sixth facility.

    This is all unrelated to whether the agency also needs to relocate its downtown bus yard in order to accommodate a new convention center-stadium project, an MTS spokesman said.

    This is worth clarifying because two separate documents referred generally to the agency’s need for a new bus yard at the same estimated cost − $100 million – as the one anticipated for a convadium-forced relocation of their downtown facility.

    The new bus yard is included in a list of transportation-related projects that the San Diego Association of Governments, or SANDAG, is considering including in a ballot measure and tax increase that would go before voters in November.

    In a publication for MTS staff, the agency also mentioned its need to secure long-term growth by building a new, $100 million bus yard. Studying the best location to fill that need was a priority for 2016, MTS CEO Paul Jablonski wrote.


    Support Independent Journalism Today

    Both of those documents refer to MTS’s need for an additional facility. Agency spokesman Rob Schupp confirmed that the need exists regardless of whether MTS has to relocate its existing downtown facility to make way for a convention center-stadium.

    There’s a third bus facility that also has nothing at all to do with what happens if the city builds a downtown convadium: MTS has for a few years needed a staging area in the Little Italy area for buses cycling on and off their routes. SANDAG is now trying to roll that project into a downtown tower project that would give the agency office space and possibly include homes and retail space.

      This article relates to: Chargers Stadium, Land Use, Public Transportation

      Written by Andrew Keatts

      I'm Andrew Keatts, a reporter for Voice of San Diego. Please contact me if you'd like at andrew.keatts@voiceofsandiego.org or 619.325.0529.

      3 comments
      Walt Brewer
      Walt Brewer subscribermember

      New bus facilities are about like docks and fueling facilities for obsolete steamships in the '30s as airlines were poised to take over trans-ocean travel.

      $100 million to be sure is a drop in the bucket part of the SANDAG Plan to spend nearly$40 Billion capital for new mass transit. These lavish installations are supposed to overcome mass transit's lack of access compared to doorstep and curbside access long provided by preferred personal travel in automobiles.

      Meantime, private enterprise, on-call auto providers are showing how service is done by appointment rather than autoownership. Then a same vehicle ride direct to real destinations instead of start stop transfer mass transit offers.

      Shouldn't we be examining that form of Public Transportation before we commit to $40 billion and adding a new sales tax? Consideringnew mass transit costs are approaching private on-call service, and fares reflect subsidy about 1/2 O & M costs, the transition should be manageable. Non-drivers, principal mass transit users, would enjoy the better service.

      Lyft, Uber, etc., are now fledging operations compared even to even MTS small travel share. But so were the airlines in the late'30s. How many steamships or even docks do you see in travel service?

      Mystic Traveler
      Mystic Traveler subscriber

      "Convadium" is the stupidest made-up word that I've heard in a long time.  Sounds like "Fail" to me.

      Chris Brewster
      Chris Brewster subscribermember

      And this is important to know because?