voiceofsandiego.org: Slop... On Your Marks
an independent nonprofit |
Support This Service

On Your Marks

Published: Friday, June 1, 2007 2:01 PM PDT



So the U-T says Mayor Jerry Sanders wants to run for re-election.

Here's the take:

Speculation abounds that Sanders privately told backers his plans in January to prevent support from going to other like-minded candidates.

That speculation was pretty well confirmed in February in this voiceofsandiego.org story:

Wednesday, Feb. 7, 2007 | Over a breakfast of omelets and fresh fruit, Mayor Jerry Sanders made himself clear to a group of his heftiest political supporters two weeks ago: He will be seeking a second term in next year's elections.

Sanders has not publicly announced his aspirations for re-election, but the announcement -- confirmed by several attendees of the Jan. 22 event -- signals Sanders' efforts to shore up political and financial support before any other potential challengers can begin courting them.

We always wondered why nobody else picked up that story.

So, what do you think? Is Sanders going to have any competition for re-election? A lot of people are speculating that City Councilwoman Donna Frye will give it a third shot. She's the only prominent Democrat in this town that has mustered the courage to run for mayor in recent years. Even when former Mayor Dick Murphy was getting hammered virtually every day, not a single major San Diego Democrat was tough enough to challenge him.

As election season wore on, Frye decided to throw her hat in to make that incredible write-in campaign. She almost pulled it off.

Running this time, however, would be her toughest challenge. The stars virtually aligned in her favor after Murphy resigned under a cloud of controversy. Yet, in the special election to replace him, Frye couldn't close the deal. Now you have a politically stronger mayor running as an incumbent for re-election.

Common sense would hold that challenging Sanders now would be much tougher.

Then again, I'm the first to admit that I'm dreadful at predicting elections.

On the other hand, of course, it's obvious businessman Steve Francis wants to run for mayor. Now, the question is, will he?

I thought this story was good exploring the topic.

If I were to place a wager, I'd say Francis goes for it (he certainly has the financial freedom to do it, according to this timely story) and then Frye jumps in. Sanders has a good chance of winning 50 percent of the vote in the primary and therefore avoiding a runoff in the general election unless he's challenged by two major candidates. If Francis has the confidence to give it a shot, that'll give Frye another rational reason for going for it.

We'll see.

-- SCOTT LEWIS




4 Comments so far on this story...

Francis would probably be a good mayor, but Sanders has so far more than earned another term to finish what he has started. Francis would probably be a good successor to Sanders. But to the extent Francis running in '08 would open the door to a challenge from Frye, however unlikely her victory would be, it would be unwelcome, and would cause those in the Republican fold to make Francis pay - and not with his money. Francis would be well-advised to support Sanders, including through constructive criticism, and position himself as a tax-payer representative in 2012. He's young and rich. He can manage to keep himself both busy and relevant for four more years.

Posted by Ronald Truman | reply to this comment
June 1, 2007 8:28 am

Sanders has done nothing to fix the financial problems of this City, as such I do not see why anyone would vote for him again. We need that attorney from VofSD, the one who said filing BK would be best option for San Diego-let's draft him to run again-he has my vote.

Posted by Billy Bob Henry | reply to this comment
June 1, 2007 8:50 am

BBH, why are you so for the city going BK? Let's here your words of wisdom on this topic you surely know so much about.

Posted by Citizen X | reply to this comment
June 1, 2007 10:25 am

Vote for a man that is not on the up and up and puts our city in a HUGE position of liability and more importantly supports Sunroad's building height which could result in serious bodily injury should a plane hit the building....WHY??? Check this write up today link

Posted by Norman | reply to this comment
June 1, 2007 9:52 pm


Reader feedback
  • Users may post more than one comment, but should not pose as multiple users. Multiple posts from the same IP address but with a different user name on each will be reviewed to determine whether abuse has occurred.
  • Posts with overly personal attacks or unsubstantiated allegations may be edited or deleted.
  • Please be patient with the posts -- there may be a delay before they appear on the site -- and make sure to enter the code in the "image verification" box.
Post a comment
Name:
Email:
Comments:
Current Word Count: Verification Code
ca336c1

Scott Lewis on Politics

The Scott Lewis on Politics blog, abbreviated cleverly as SLOP, is a collection of observations, insights and the occasional scoop on public affairs in San Diego. Please feel free to e-mail Scott at scott.lewis@voiceofsandiego.org.


Listen to voiceofsandiego.org's radio program on AM 600 KOGO: Latest Episode (November 8): Scott Lewis and Michael Zucchet talk about the city's budget

Subscribe to the Podcast Feed



MOST POPULAR STORIES:



MOST POPULAR STORIES:


Copyright © 2009 voiceofsandiego.org. All Rights Reserved.