voiceofsandiego.org: Slop... A Follow-Up
an independent nonprofit |
Support This Service

A Follow-Up

Published: Tuesday, July 3, 2007 6:27 PM PDT



You'll remember yesterday I noted that somebody must not be telling the truth about this situation. Sunroad Enterprises says the city told it to stop giving money to the city as part of a charitable program to fund the fire helicopter. Here's how the Sunroad spokeswoman put it to my colleague in the news department, Andrew Donohue:

"We are right here at the beginning of the fire season, and the Mayor's Office has asked Sunroad to stop its fundraising activities," said company spokeswoman Karen Hutchens.

Then reporter Will Carless followed up with this response from the Mayor's Office:

Nobody from Mayor Jerry Sanders’ office has asked Sunroad to call off its planned donations to the city of San Diego’s Fire-Rescue Department, the mayor's spokesman just told me.

Fred Sainz said Sunroad spokeswoman Karen Hutchens is incorrect in saying that the city has asked the company to call off its final $200,000 donation towards the city’s Fire-Rescue Department’s helicopter.


So I observed, I don't think incorrectly, that somebody simply wasn't telling the truth.

I guess if I'm going to say someone lied, I better find out who.

Not so easy.

Sunroad's Hutchens said she was tired of this "unproductive" discussion. Never mind, of course, that she's the one who said the mayor was about to let the city burn.

Sunroad, a few years ago, committed to sending the city $1 million over time to fund the fire and rescue helicopter. You'll note this isn't an entirely selfless act on the part of Sunroad. The company's name appears on the side of the helicopter. Not charity, the city calls it a "marketing partnership." You can watch a Fox6 video treatment of the helicopter here -- notice the Sunroad logo in the profile shots of the helicopter.

Hutchens said she did not know who or how the city communicated to Sunroad to, as she alleged, stop sending the checks for the helicopter.

She said that, every year, the company hosts a golf tournament fundraiser every year to help pay for its annual $200,000 donation to the cause.

"That fundraising activity was placed on hold and it was not necessarily our intention to put it on hold," she said.

In other words, I guess she's trying to say the city told them to do it?

No, she wouldn't commit to that.

"I think enough has been said about this today. The most important thing is that we get the fundraising back on track," she said.

But she had alleged that the mayor was putting the city in danger and refusing Sunroad's money for the helicopter. Didn't she want to substantiate that claim? Tell us who, from the city, told Sunroad its money was no longer welcome?

She said she didn't know.

I asked if she could find out.

She said she'd get back to me.

Also today, I heard from the mayor's spokesman, Fred Sainz. He wrote in an e-mail that "it's time for Ms. Hutchens to back up her allegations." And he alerted me to some correspondence a Sunroad affiliate had with the city last month that he said was not material, but looks like it is somewhat related to me.

The city sent out a Request for Sponsorship for all vehicles the city uses.

According to the request, sent out by Jennifer Wolff, the development director for the city's Corporate Partnership Program, the sponsor would get to be the "Official Vehicle Partner of the City of San Diego."

Some of the marketing benefits available to the "Official Vehicle Partner of the City of San Diego" include marketing directly to the City's 10,000 employees and their families, 6,000 retirees and their families, visibility with 22 million visitors on the City's beaches and sponsorship of special events and promotions. We plan to complete our process by early Fall.


Wolff sent this to representatives of Pacific Honda. And she and they were working toward a deal when she realized that Pacific Honda is owned by Sunroad.

Unfortunately, the City has a policy in place which states we can not engage in a new marketing partnership with parties involved in a law suit with the City.

Here's a copy of that city policy.

Now, Sainz said this only affects new partnerships. Here's what he wrote to me:

The marketing partnership with Sunroad on the fire helicopter is in force and we have made no moves to amend it. Until yesterday. Ms. Hutchens' comments sensitized us to whether or not the City should continue its partnership with the company. As a result, I have spoken with the City Attorney and asked him to advise on the legal and and/or perceptual conflicts, if any. The City is very grateful to Sunroad for their charitable contributions for our fire helicopter. My disagreement with Ms. Hutchens should in no way overwhelm the good work that Sunroad has done on this project.


So, apparently, the city is hesitating in accepting the money from Sunroad to fund the helicopter. If city officials think that's the right move for now, they should just say so and be proud of it. But there were two types of hesitation: The one that was resistant to a new partnership with Sunroad; and the one that came after Sunroad's spokesman said the mayor wanted to let the city burn to the ground.

Hutchens said if Sanders had no problem with Sunroad's partnership, the company would continue "the activities" that would enable it to send over some money to the city.

Now the ball's in the city attorney's court.

I'm sure he's going to recommend the city do whatever makes Sunroad happy. Right?

-- SCOTT LEWIS




11 Comments so far on this story...

For all the anti-war folks who criticize Bush's foreign policy in favor of a more diplomatic approach, consider just how much Aguirre lacks in such diplomacy. A trait of utmost importance for ANY polititian. It appears Aguirre has put the city in a bind with respect to Sunroad after all. Maybe Sanders had it right all along.

Posted by Leanne | reply to this comment
July 3, 2007 12:06 pm

Why is it that everytime anyone or any company gives charitable contributions, there are those that smell controversy. So what...take their money...let them get a tax break. Isn't that what this country was built on? We are a capitalistic society...accept it, admit it and for goodness sake, enjoy it. I of course, will never get ahead because I actually work for a government agency that pays me squat compared to my private sector colleagues....but again, I say "hey...give the people your money...just don't expect (or accept) any favors for it"...by the way BBH..pound sand...Happy 4th everyone

Posted by forgoodnesssakes | reply to this comment
July 4, 2007 1:45 am

Sunroad helping San Diego raise a million, while they are suing us for 40 million?

Posted by Steve K | reply to this comment
July 5, 2007 12:02 am

Leanne, imagine you have a City Attorney who is elected, gets into office, and finds out that everyone around him and even the "process" is corrupt. I think Aguirre was as diplomatic as the situation would allow, which was for quite a while (9 months calling on the Mayor to issue a stop work order, and the Mayor did it only after he spent money on outside legal counsel to tell him the same thing). Remember the uselessness of the Casey Gwinn office that helped get us into some of the trouble we are currently in? Sanders put the City in a bind by sending mixed messages to Sunroad, i.e. "winterizing". I don't even know how you can come to the conclusion that Aguirre put the City in a bind. His message has been consistent, unlike Merry Jerry's.

Posted by Doug | reply to this comment
July 5, 2007 1:16 am

Right Leanne, Mike is the bad guy here. He personally kicked Sunroads unethical and lying butt all over the public relations football field and Scamroad finally caved-and agreed to fix their scam building, but Mike is at fault. Hmm, very good logic you have there. Whats next-are you going to say Mike caused the Iraq war, global warming, the break up of the Beatles? Please.

Posted by Billy! Bob! Henry! | reply to this comment
July 5, 2007 2:17 am

Perhaps if ALL legitimate media would get their facts and the entire story before printing/broadcastin news stories, it would enable the tabloids to do the hypes/speculations, sensationalism and then when we read/heard it in a mainstream form it just might be the whole truth.

Posted by Jean | reply to this comment
July 5, 2007 2:53 am

Leanne- your last comment (previous SLOP entry) and this one confuses me. You are advocating bribery, so long as the bribery is in the millions of dollars in the form of a helicoptor? Aguirre hit a homer on this one, and I don't know what Jerry will have to do to get all this egg off his face. Aguirre is aggressively pursuing the best interest of the citizens. Isn't that his job? Jerry didn't change course until EVERYONE, not just Aguirre, realized how shady the whole scenario is. Love him or hate him, Aguirre did the right thing here.

Posted by Omni-potent | reply to this comment
July 5, 2007 4:30 am

There's the line that goes something to the effect if you hit on every girl you come in contact with, eventually, one will give you their number. This is what has happened with sunroad. MiteyMike has called virtually every person, thing, inanimate object he has come in contact with either criminal or corrupt or both. Finally, he found something that actually was. Bid deal. Can't blame sanders for hiring outside councel to confirm. Who wouldn't want a second (legal) opinion, based on Mikey's .o43 batting average.

Posted by D | reply to this comment
July 5, 2007 6:21 am

No Omni-potent, don't get me wrong. I am not defending Sunroad. I just think there are more effective ways to deal with problems. Start with dialog and increase your use of force as required. Don't jump from A to Z. I think Sanders was on the right track in gaining the cooperation of Sunroad and Aguirre was only an impediment. Where Sanders went wrong was not standing up for what he believed once the issue became so politicized. He should have explained his position and stood his ground. There is plenty of blame to go around. Sunroad is greedy. Aguirre is a bully. And, Sanders is weak.

Posted by Leanne | reply to this comment
July 5, 2007 9:07 am

Scott: How is it that a City Councilman in Chula Vista accuses DA Dumanis of a political witch hunt and the same councilman later gets indicted and the Voice of SD is completely silent on both? You have got to be kidding me. You write about staff changes in the SD Mayors office for a week but this doesnt make it? C'mon get with it!

Posted by Freddy | reply to this comment
July 5, 2007 10:29 am

D-you could hit on every signle girl in San Diego County and NEVER get a number. So much for you rlogic.

Posted by Billy! Bb!! Henry!!! | reply to this comment
July 6, 2007 3:32 am


Reader feedback
  • Users may post more than one comment, but should not pose as multiple users. Multiple posts from the same IP address but with a different user name on each will be reviewed to determine whether abuse has occurred.
  • Posts with overly personal attacks or unsubstantiated allegations may be edited or deleted.
  • Please be patient with the posts -- there may be a delay before they appear on the site -- and make sure to enter the code in the "image verification" box.
Post a comment
Name:
Email:
Comments:
Current Word Count: Verification Code
72a4e91

Scott Lewis on Politics

The Scott Lewis on Politics blog, abbreviated cleverly as SLOP, is a collection of observations, insights and the occasional scoop on public affairs in San Diego. Please feel free to e-mail Scott at scott.lewis@voiceofsandiego.org.


Listen to voiceofsandiego.org's radio program on AM 600 KOGO: Latest Episode (November 8): Scott Lewis and Michael Zucchet talk about the city's budget

Subscribe to the Podcast Feed



MOST POPULAR STORIES:



MOST POPULAR STORIES:


Copyright © 2009 voiceofsandiego.org. All Rights Reserved.