voiceofsandiego.org: Cafesandiego... The SANDAG Sand Scam
an independent nonprofit |
March to 1,000 Members: 991 so far. Contribute today.

The SANDAG Sand Scam

Published: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 8:00 PM PST



For about a week, I naively believed that the devastating wildfires that hit San Diego County might result in a dramatic change in the development at any cost policies promoted at all levels of government throughout the county. In theory, the loss of more than 4,000 homes due to the last two wildfires should have caused this shift. But I should have remembered that nothing would come between the steadfast marriage of local elected officials to their developer constituents.

Rather than deal with pressing 21st century problems such as housing, health care, education, and immigration, the leadership elite routinely invent crises to be addressed that are designed to benefit the wealthiest and most powerful San Diegans and take attention away from the real issues that confront us.

So we had the Padres crisis and a new taxpayer financed ballpark. Then we had the Chargers crisis and the ticket buyout fiasco (and continued efforts to provide more welfare for the Spanos family). Then Scott Peters invented the Children's Pool crisis, scaring La Jollans into believing that marauding bands of harbor seals were poised to invade the boutiques and discount Botox outlets on Fay Avenue.

Now with the help of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, SANDAG, and two sand lobbyists, we are in the throes of the newest "crisis" in San Diego County. In the words of one Imperial Beach city council member, the newest calamity, the beach towel crisis, requires that we spend tens of millions of dollars, "to make sure that a family can have a place to put their towels when they come to the beach."

Much of the beach towel crisis hysteria in San Diego County is the work of sand lobbyists, D.C.-based Howard Marlowe (referred to as "Sand-a Claus") and his associate Steve Aceti of Carlsbad. Marlowe is the brainchild behind much of the sand pork in the Bush vetoed (and overridden) Water Resources Development Act.

Aceti is the Executive Director of the non-profit lobbying group CALCOAST and sits on the SANDAG Shoreline Preservation Committee (Aceti did not respond to two email requests for specific information about his financial relationship to Marlowe). Through their efforts, sand projects are no longer framed as public welfare for millionaire beachfront property owners, but as ways to help downtrodden beachgoers.

Most experts on coastal ecosystems agree that sand replenishment projects are what Mark Massara of the Sierra Club calls:

an exercise in futility. "..These beach nourishment projects are like taking public taxpayer dollars and throwing them into the sea," Massara said. "The lesson learned is that nourishment alone will not protect San Diego beaches longer than the first day of moderate surf."


But despite what is the scientific consensus that sand replenishment projects are an absolute waste of public funds and have a devastating impact on fragile marine and coastal ecosystems, we have at least $78 million on the table in San Diego County in proposed sand projects to protect the most expensive beachfront private property from Imperial Beach to Oceanside.

Bush's failed veto of the Water Resources Development Act, was largely over projects such as the controversial Imperial Beach $56 million sand replenishment project that USA Today listed as one of the top three pork projects in the U.S.:

This bloated package is of course, an exercise in local greed and political clout. $56 million to replenish sand at Imperial Beach in San Diego County. Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., defends it as a way to fight "storm surge." That's dubious, and in any case, why should taxpayers in Kansas have to re-sand a beach in California?"


Last week, the city of Imperial Beach voted to allocate $31,000 of redevelopment funds to SANDAG to pay for a $500,000 feasibility study that would pave the way for a new countywide $22 million dollar sand replenishment program in 2010. This was despite the fact that the city and the Army Corps of Engineers recently spent over $1.7 million dollars on a similar feasibility study for Imperial Beach. SANDAG is also exploring other funding options that could include placing a bond measure on the ballot to raise further funds for sand replenishment efforts so that everyone in San Diego County would have the honor of paying to protect the most privileged private property owners on the planet.

Given the fact that City of San Diego is prepared to spend between $500,000-$1 million to remove sand from Casa Beach in order get ride of the seals, why not take the La Jolla sand and dump it in Qualcomm Stadium. That way we would save $78 million and the next round of fire evacuees would be able to lay out on their Padres beach towels at the Q while awaiting the verdict on whether or not they lost their homes.

-- SERGE DEDINA




15 Comments so far on this story...

I think people who live in fear should not have blogs. I'm sorry you feel the world is coming to an abrupt end and that everyone is ignoring your dreams of no growth in San Diego. We have the best climate in the world, what makes you think you are somehow more deserving than others?

Posted by Get real | reply to this comment
November 14, 2007 10:27 pm

It's really all about the surfin' isn't it? Got any citations of peer reviewed scientific unanimity? Or did you just ask your surfin' buddies with Master of Science degrees. Add what's with the crap about not responding to your email? Either you got the facts or you don't. Ask you journalist surfin' buddies how to do it right.

Posted by rrrr | reply to this comment
November 15, 2007 6:43 am

How about we return the manmande Children's pool to the use for which it was intended, and make Imperial Beach the next seal sanctuary? Pull the surfers out of the water and let the seals in. Might actually make Imperial Beach someplace people would want to go to.

Posted by Larry | reply to this comment
November 15, 2007 7:59 am

Two points: With a national debt of close to 9 trillion dollars, I would rephrase the USA Today question to--Why should future taxpayers have to resand a beach in California, now--when the sand will be gone after a winter or two. Second, the reason the city needs to dredge the Children's Pool, is that the water there is polluted by e-coli bacteria, year round.

Posted by Steve K | reply to this comment
November 15, 2007 9:01 am

I would have expected you at the Coastal Commission hearings today for the Carlsbad desal project. Maybe you are there. There are many that hope the Coastal Commission will go against its own staff report and approve the project. There is no question that we need the water. If they do not approve it, we will be faced with the ugly prospect of "toilet-to-tap", which will put the health of many of us at risk, but will mmake sizeable profits for the supporters of those projects, many of whom are very vocal against the Carlsbad desal project.

Posted by San Marcos says, | reply to this comment
November 15, 2007 9:08 am

Oooh, take that, Serge! Those two posts really got to the core of the matter, didn't they? What the hey, if you haven't any facts of your own you can always dump on the writer; there's an entire media structure that uses that strategy daily to save on research costs. But actually Serge, you don't matter. None of us do. We're merely peasants allowed to live here by those who own SD because we serve the economy. And if those who own SD want beach towels on beaches, and they can make money from Uncle to get it, we the peasants are going to have sandy beaches--you bet! And that won't change until the peasants stop supporting this economy. It's time to revolt and use our money and spending power as Strategic Weapon Number One.

Posted by King of the Peasants! | reply to this comment
November 15, 2007 9:59 am

Wow. What's with the negativity? Serge asks important and legitimate questions about how we spend tax dollars and the sharp knives come out. Sensitive topic or old grudges? FYI Here are related articles, reports etc for those who care and want more info: link link link

Posted by got sand? | reply to this comment
November 15, 2007 10:44 am

The people in Sand (yes) Diego are the most ignorant on earth. You have been fooled in the past (waterflue, stadiums, etc.) so why would the present or any future be any different. You people get the government you deserve.

Posted by quicken | reply to this comment
November 15, 2007 12:07 pm

As Coronado's representative to the SANDAG Shoreline Preservation working group I voted for the updated sand replenishment study. It saddens me that true discourse is always hidden behind personal interests "surfers vs. beach homeowners". I don't surf, own a beach front home, my community doesn't need sand replenishment (thanks to the currents we get it naturally), and I didnt get any campaign funds from developers. I do however think we need to maintain the sand up and down our coast for all beach users. This is true for all of California. We know how sand replenishment helps that's why I and SANDAG members voted for it. I haven't seen any downside except cost sharing and impact in some surfing locations. This is proactive maintenance to preserve our beach lifestyle.

Posted by Coronado Mayor Pro Tem Carrie | reply to this comment
November 15, 2007 12:18 pm

The author has never attended a meeting of the SANDAG Shoreline Preservation Workgroup, nor has he read any of the voluminous studies that were conducted before and after SANDAG restored the region's beaches in 2001. If he had, he would know that the project did not have any adverse impacts on the environment and, in some places, the additinoal sand created habitat for endangered shorebirds and grunion. The region has a 30 million cy deficit of sand due to dams, urbanization of the coastal zone and sand mining in rivers. Forget about the homeowners - beach nourishment projects restore natural infrastructure that provides environmental, recreation and economic benefits to the region. It's easy to say things like "there is scientific consensus" that sand replenishment projects are a waste of public funds, or that they "have a devastating impact on fragile marine and coastal ecosystems," but neither statement is tru

Posted by Get a Clue | reply to this comment
November 15, 2007 12:32 pm

For information about the state's beach restoration program, including studies about the economic benefits derived from having healthy beaches, go to link

Posted by Get a Clue | reply to this comment
November 15, 2007 12:59 pm

The city and the County Water Authority have a problem with polluted water in Lake Hodges, and a silted up reservoir that needs to be restored by dredging. SANDAG needs sand for regional beaches. Why not solve everyones problems with an agreement for the city to dredge Lake Hodges, thereby improving the reservoirs water quality and holding capacity, and pump the sand from the project down the San Dieguito River to be distributed on regional beaches? The city, CWA and SANDAG could jointly fund the project Seems like a win-win for everyone if we could just get past interagency turf wars and wrangling.

Posted by Watcher | reply to this comment
April 29, 2008 8:27 am

This is just a preview of the battle when the rich and self-centered forces at SANDAG actually believe they will get voters to increase taxes to pave the beaches with sand that gets washed out quickly. Why not just pave them with the dollar bills directly? Now that would attract tourists! Many of the most expensive beaches in the world have NO sand to begin with nor do they import it. They put mats on the rocks. Yes right on the Spanish, French and Italian Riviera. But we wouldn't know about that here. We're too busy kowtowing to the wealthy coastal cities that think we should subsidize their temporary sand fantasies. Get over it. You won't get voter approval. No amount of studies can overcome the facts of watching taxpayer sand wash out to sea.

Posted by Taxpayer | reply to this comment
April 29, 2008 11:12 am

Kudos for speaking out against sand replenishment. I've seen it first-hand on two coasts, subjected to ACoE NJ propaganda videos (pro-replenishment to reverse the effects of their other great NJ 'triumph' - seawalls and jetties), and now in CA. Over a decade later from the initial pump project (early 90's), NJ beaches are right back to where they were in spots (multiple pumpings). It's absurd how much money was spent dredging sand from NY harbor, pumping it on beaches (with unexploded WWII-era ordinance that slipped through the intake screens, btw), just so it could re-journey north. I love CA for its conscientiousness - I hope we decide public tax money should not fight this losing battle, here or anywhere. If it's so important, let wealthy oceanfront landowners apply estate funds against the erosion issue. They cannot plead ignorance to the risk(s).

Posted by freesine | reply to this comment
April 29, 2008 7:23 pm

The original publishing date is old, but the story isn't... Now we're in the hurricane seige of 2008. The folks in New Orleans will all miracously float on the incoming tide of storm water since our governement can't build a decent levee in Louisiana. In our part of the world, the Army Corps of Engineers is boondoggling the crap out of us with useless sand projects that some cockeyed hack decided would be good for the american coastline. When I see sand getting dumped and waves tearing the post foundations of some shack in Florida and the east coast in general, I wonder who the hell thinks they can outbuild mother nature? I don't need to go to some idiotic SANDAG sponsored meeting to see the obvious - the earth is getting screwed. Got dirt? Indeed.

Posted by Bryan | reply to this comment
September 3, 2008 1:46 pm


Reader feedback
  • Users may post more than one comment, but should not pose as multiple users. Multiple posts from the same IP address but with a different user name on each will be reviewed to determine whether abuse has occurred.
  • Posts with overly personal attacks or unsubstantiated allegations may be edited or deleted.
  • Please be patient with the posts -- there may be a delay before they appear on the site -- and make sure to enter the code in the "image verification" box.
Post a comment
Name:
Email:
Comments:
Current Word Count: Verification Code
901a71b



MOST POPULAR STORIES:


Copyright © 2009 voiceofsandiego.org. All Rights Reserved.