voiceofsandiego.org: Slop... To the Ballot?
an independent nonprofit |
Support This Service

To the Ballot?

Published: Thursday, November 8, 2007 2:36 PM PST



There was no shortage of talk yesterday that the vaunted San Diego business community would try to force a citywide initiative in the event that the proposals of the mayor's Charter Review Committee met resistance at the City Council.

Well, they met resistance. I wondered whether this meant that an initiative might be on the way.

The most obvious person in town to coordinate that initiative would be political consultant Tom Shepard, who is running the mayor's reelection campaign and is no slouch when it comes to getting initiatives passed in the city.

Shepard is also helping to oversee a burgeoning pot of money that can be spent on a campaign for something like this.

So what does Shepard say?

Tom Shepard: Is there an initiative in his sleeve?
"There are a number of people I've talked to who have been supportive of the mayor's reform effort who were very, very skeptical of the City Council's willingness to put anything on the ballot that would compromise their prerogatives," Shepard told me.

He continued.

"There have been a number of discussions about the possibility that if the council blocked those proposals and avoided their responsibilities with regard to these issues, there would be a need to do some kind of initiative," Shepard said.

But this brings up a whole slew of questions.

The mayor himself has now said that he doesn't want people to have to vote on the strong mayor form of government until they've had a few more years to look it over.

So again, like I asked before, what's the point of an initiative now?

After all, Shepard agreed with the mayor: The time isn't right to make strong mayor permanent.

"It's too early to determine. Nobody can make an assessment of whether this thing is working," Shepard said.

So why now? If the mayor's not on board with extending it now, if Shepard isn't and, of course, their critics aren't, then what would be on the initiative?

Shepard made a point that was also held by Democratic lobbyist Adrian Kwiatkowski, who sat on the Charter Review Committee: Right now, there's no guarantee that voters will get a chance to extend the current form of government beyond 2010. They said there at least needs to be something done now to ensure that the question is dealt with in 2010.

They want to put something in the charter that says have a vote on extending this in 2010.

Would that be all that the supposed initiative is about?

"My guess is if there were an initiative circulated, that would be one of the provisions of it," Shepard said.

-- SCOTT LEWIS




6 Comments so far on this story...

Let's get an initiative on the ballot that makes the mayor and council part-time, unpaid positions. That'd get approved in a heartbeat.

Posted by Dukestir Wilkes | reply to this comment
November 8, 2007 3:38 pm

An initiative to ensure a future initiative?

Posted by Confused | reply to this comment
November 8, 2007 3:39 pm

The Mayor bit off more then he could chew and now is stuck trying to appease the powers that can keep him in power. We have seen very little reform and alot of screwing up. His donors are pissed, the city employees are pissed, people can't leave his administration fast enough, etc., etc., etc..

Posted by Joe | reply to this comment
November 8, 2007 9:38 pm

That would be great, if you want unemployable losers running the city. Don't you think we ought to attract people who have other options? What we ought to do is put it on the ballot to extend the experiment to 2012, and put it on the ballot in 2010 to make it permanent. We give ourselves time to assess, and don't have a gap.

Posted by Say, Dukestir | reply to this comment
November 8, 2007 10:13 pm

You're worried about unemployable losers running the city? What do you think we have now? There is a guy that has other options that we may want to consider - Steve Francis. Sure, he has his own reasons for running (i.e. ego) but he surely doesn't need the employment. As to the strong mayor...Pete Wilson was a strong mayor. He didn't need the governmental structure changed to get things done.

Posted by Dukestir Wilkes | reply to this comment
November 9, 2007 7:06 am

I hate to see the usual suspects manipulating things in our city government, behind the scenes. It looks like more of the 'climate of corruption', to me.

Posted by Steve K | reply to this comment
November 9, 2007 7:37 am


Reader feedback
  • Users may post more than one comment, but should not pose as multiple users. Multiple posts from the same IP address but with a different user name on each will be reviewed to determine whether abuse has occurred.
  • Posts with overly personal attacks or unsubstantiated allegations may be edited or deleted.
  • Please be patient with the posts -- there may be a delay before they appear on the site -- and make sure to enter the code in the "image verification" box.
Post a comment
Name:
Email:
Comments:
Current Word Count: Verification Code
5672cc3

Scott Lewis on Politics

The Scott Lewis on Politics blog, abbreviated cleverly as SLOP, is a collection of observations, insights and the occasional scoop on public affairs in San Diego. Please feel free to e-mail Scott at scott.lewis@voiceofsandiego.org.


Listen to voiceofsandiego.org's radio program on AM 600 KOGO: Latest Episode (November 8): Scott Lewis and Michael Zucchet talk about the city's budget

Subscribe to the Podcast Feed



MOST POPULAR STORIES:



MOST POPULAR STORIES:


Copyright © 2009 voiceofsandiego.org. All Rights Reserved.