voiceofsandiego.org: Scott Lewis... What a Difference a Year (and a New Manager) Makes
an independent nonprofit |
March to 1,000 Members: 991 so far. Contribute today.

What a Difference a Year (and a New Manager) Makes



Thursday, Nov. 1, 2007 | It can't be a very politically advantageous thing to propose laying off firefighters and police officers when the air has barely cleared from one of the worst wildfires this county has seen.

But you have to admire someone when they just don't care what is politically advantageous.

Chula Vista's new city manager, David Garcia, is saying what many Chula Vista officials were flatly denying or recklessly spinning just a year ago.

The city is in serious financial trouble. It is structurally unbalanced and has one year to figure out how to repair that structure before it joins the ignoble class of municipalities that attract national attention -- and lose their credit rating -- because of their extraordinary fiscal woes.

Those no longer are the conclusions of people scouring Chula Vista's books from the outside. They are Garcia's warnings.

And he's put together a list of the things residents should expect to lose because of the troubles.

The list is staggering. I've been looking at agency budgets and memorandums for several years and never have I seen a list of service cuts this long and ambitious before. Most government officials become masters at finding ways to hide the pain. They never want people to know what the consequences of past actions really are. They may say they have a deficit or budget trouble. But they never lay out what it would take to fix it.

Garcia has done just that. And this is just to get through the year.

Chula Vista, like the rest of the county, just weathered a wildfire that made global news. Yet the city had no emergency manager -- that position is vacant and remains so because of a rigid hiring freeze Garcia implemented soon after he took charge in June.

Unless the Chula Vista City Council can find another way to score some cash, Garcia has said it will have to close a fire station and lay off six police officers. He has several firefighters on the list of cuts, including a deputy chief and a nine-member urban search and rescue team. He says the city will have to outsource the fire communications services and lay off a police officer assigned to the K-9 unit and another who specializes in white collar crime.

Managers are seeing their budgets eliminated. Others are being invited -- lured -- into an early retirement. Garcia's list includes 195 specific cuts and 105 layoffs.

The list goes on and on -- you can see it here. Everything from a morning swim class and summer day camps to hours at the South Chula Vista Library are on the chopping block.

This all started this summer when I and others noticed an incredible change of tone (candor ... wow!) coming out of the brand new City Hall in the city of San Diego's large neighbor to the south. It hadn't been that long ago that Chula Vista officials scorned and chided critics who had the gall to suggest the city was in trouble. It was truly ridiculous to suggest that the remarkable housing boom might end and no longer be able to finance the frenzy of public spending.

But there's a new mayor and a new city manager in Chula Vista.

"I noticed right away that the financial condition of the city was significantly worse than had been presented in the budget that was adopted before I came," Garcia said.

Garcia, in a few months, has made official what many suspected but were never able to get the city's government officials to say.

"We were using one-time revenues to pay for ongoing expenses," Garcia said.

Take a moment and consider what he means. The city largely paid for hundreds of new employees, a new City Hall, a new police station, a new park and other gourmet government goodies with the revenue it received from the fees developers paid to build new homes in the city. Well, that, and just plain old loans.

"We were just finishing those new facilities and we had to start paying to operate them. But the development of new homes abruptly stopped, causing unprecedented drops in revenue for the city," Garcia said. "It was a perfect storm of financial problems."

He went on.

"Chula Vista is carrying a significant amount of debt and major debt obligations. When you roll that into our ongoing operating expenses -- that's basically what our problem is," Garcia said.

Then I brought up a pet issue. More than a year ago, I had gotten a bit aggravated. The Union-Tribune had just done a story about how San Diego city police officers were looking for and getting jobs in Chula Vista with the promise of higher pay. It was true. Chula Vista promised police substantial raises every year for the next five years.

How well off could Chula Vista actually be? Would it ever have the same kind of financial trouble the city of San Diego had, the kind that forces you not to give cops raises?

Sure enough, Chula Vista was ramping up the payments to its own pension plan as rapidly as anyone in the state. That's fine -- as long as you can afford it.

Turns out Chula Vista can't.

Again, Garcia:

"We have some of the highest salaries in San Diego. Pension payments are a function of salaries. I don't mind paying the highest salaries because I think we have some of the best people in the county. But frankly, we're in a financial crisis now," he said. They all had to do something about it, Garcia insisted.

Wow, a government official admitting that an entity is paying its employees quite a bit more than the norm? This is really new ground here.

When I suggested that it might be hard for Chula Vista to pay its police officers what it promised, I was engulfed in criticism, as were others.

Garcia, though, now has a proposal for the City Council: He's going to ask them to allow him to renegotiate the contracts with the police officers and the city's other employees. He's going to ask that they accept a 2 percent raise this year as opposed to the 4 percent raise that they were promised. The city's police and firefighters will not be accustomed to this. Over the last four years, their salaries have increased 25 percent across the board.

Chula Vista is deep in debt.

And the people that loan it money have noticed. The credit rating agency Standard & Poor's lowered the city's credit rating in September. Garcia said he has promised Standard & Poor's and others that within a year, things would be different.

If they are not, like many of the people who bought homes inside the city, Chula Vista is going to be fielding some uncomfortable calls from its lenders.

Please contact Scott Lewis directly with your thoughts, ideas, personal stories or tips. Or send a letter to the editor.




14 Comments so far on this story...

And how 'bout that big ole Bayfront subsidy, Ms. Cox? Yeehaw Gaylord, back to Nashville!!! Let's make the whole thing a big park, eh?

Posted by 2 cent Jack | reply to this comment
October 31, 2007 8:39 pm

It's an interesting point of view, you have there Mr. Lewis. Any public official that doesn't share your conservative (libertarian?) views is guilty of not telling the truth. CV was essentially financially sunk when it bet that new housing construction would continue at the same pace as the recent past. A risky bet? Yes, unethical or illegal? Hardly. Right now corporate executives in the private sector are facing similar scenarios--they bet on one "future" and another (much different) arrives. True enough that Mr. Garcia is "telling it like it is", but what does he lose by doing so? If he pulls it off, he will be a hero, if not--he blames the past regime and moves on to another gig.... Knight in shining armor? I doubt it. But, he's doing what YOU want, so YOU have knighted him....

Posted by Southof8 | reply to this comment
October 31, 2007 8:48 pm

I said it 2 years ago when all the SDPD welfare queens said that SDPD needs to pay what CV pays-I said CV is going to go BK TOO! And I will tell you right now, it is going to happen, just like it will in SD. These pie in the sky pension scams CANNOT be sustained. You bascially have two sets of City employees, those working to age 50, and those age 50 to age 100 who have reitred, and the retirees get more money than current employees, with the pension scam,

Posted by Billy Bob Henry | reply to this comment
October 31, 2007 10:03 pm

Every city should have a City Manager like Garcia. It is only a matter of time before many other cities that have been riding the boom times in construction will notice that they are in debt and the surpluses they have in their budgets are gone . When they lose their ability to pay their debts, their bond ratings suffer and in some cases they cannot even float the bonds. Are the Mello Roos tax districts, which are very widely used in some cities, a way of insulating them somewhat, because that stream of revenue continues, sometimes in perpetuity ? And just exactly what happens when those taxes expire ? Next, what about the widespread use of Redevelopment Districts with their bond issues, and the new streams of revenue that the new districts cause. Great for the city but bad for the county revenue.

Posted by San Marcos says, | reply to this comment
November 1, 2007 6:04 am

There are necessary cuts that are NOT being proposed by this City Manager--to the city beaucracy (Public Affairs, political staff positions, and community development). These cuts are not being proposed, yet, this City Manager and Mayor Cheryl Cox will put firefighters and police on the block first? Explain Lucy! FYI to the Voice: Speak to the entire city council and the Mayor's Office to get the entire soldier's story and what else needs to and should be done!

Posted by more to it... | reply to this comment
November 1, 2007 7:57 am

Scott -- dodge the political bullet nailing you as a type, jeez a conservative libertarian? My dreams are shattered by you being anything since the credibility of your editorials rests strongly on a Solomon-like ambiguity that keeps your readership feeling equally respected, understood, represented and comfortable in that if you have to change your mind, you will. I don't want to downplay the value of partisanship, as I am strongly partisan, but my own view of you is that you are not. Cafe hosts, guest writers and commenters are great to sometimes stir and boil the pot with partisanship, but also, the soup needs to sit and simmer, which as cook you do a good job of moderating in your SLOP stew and editorial leadership.

Posted by Christopher Hall | reply to this comment
November 1, 2007 8:09 am

Chula Vista, like ALL area cities, has as its top priority the goal of overpaying its employees, and then pensioning them out with marvelous retirement incomes. The city honchos never considered that their mushrooming revenue stream might ever slow down. How wrong they were. Even CV's part-timers are overpaid. Summer lifeguards for the pools -- high school and college kids -- get about $3 an hour (30%) more than almost all other area cities pay their lifeguards. Rather than cutting municipal services, the city needs to go toe-to-toe with the unions. Don't hold your breath waiting for that!

Posted by Richard Rider | reply to this comment
November 1, 2007 10:49 am

Mr. Hall misses my point. There are many public officials that tell the truth--it is just that when they say something that isn't popular or isn't in agreement with a political pundit point of view--the attack is often on their personal integrity instead of their message. Like characterizing former CV officials as liars. SLOP is better than most such pundit-boards in allowing differing views but the point remains that based upon my reading and my view it HAS a philosophical, political bias. I don't take issue with the expression of such a partisan view, only that it is cloaked in words like--truth--honesty imply that any differing partisan view is--dishonest--unlaw

Posted by South of 8 | reply to this comment
November 1, 2007 11:35 am

Hey South of 8, listen to what I am saying, when Madigan was given a LIFETIME PENSION (cancelled out per the Calpers this week), on the TAXPAYERS dime, after working for barely 4 years, then there are MAJOR problems with ALL public officials-OK. This kind of nonsense does NOT happen in a vacuum, it is stipulated to by PUBLIC officials, who are passing these scams off to the children and grand children of tomorrow.

Posted by Billy Bob Henry | reply to this comment
November 1, 2007 12:28 pm

South of 8 -- Perhaps Scott is a bit partisan as you mention, but he's better at balance as you also mention. I opine, optimistically, that he should try to be non-partisan as much as possible, and I squirm at the thought of him -- anyone -- being a conservative libertarian, though from time to time, ideas may appear that way for better, but most often, for worse. I find pretty much everything you say to be right on target, in my little opinion, and appreciate your insight.

Posted by Christopher Hall | reply to this comment
November 1, 2007 2:40 pm

Garcia is doing what McGrory did, only not as well. That is, talk about the need to make draconian, dangerous cuts, thereby pressuring the city council to come up with the money, by whatever means. Only an idiot would cut Chula Vista's fire department, and presumably Garcia isn't an idiot. Also, both the Police and Fire departments in Chula are extraordinarily well-run - no good manager would make cuts there when other departments, including the city attorney, streets, and the manager's office, are overpaid, inefficient, and adverse to fiscal discipline.

Posted by This is stupid | reply to this comment
November 1, 2007 5:16 pm

Finally, a gov't. bureaucrat tells candid financial truths. A writer/editor types a complimentary column referencing that unusual occurrence. And, then if I'm reading some of these posts correctly, bloggers are criticizing those observations. Love the world of expression; but, I'm perplexed by some of the responses. On a lighter note--remember when all the disclosures surrounding Mrs. Madigan's stress issues--and at the same time she was teaching a class at UCSD. And, in spite of those disclosures she was rewarded with a generous termination package by the city of Chula Vista. At the same time, the city of Chula Vista sanctioned/penalized a woman law enforcement official for posing for some cheesecake photos. The lesson being that questionable conduct by an upper level manager can always be excused, or even rewarded. However, the rank and file can expect a public whipping. Strange priorities.

Posted by Dale Peterson | reply to this comment
November 1, 2007 6:17 pm

I was born and raised in San Diego and have since moved up (for work) in LA County. I work for a city gov't and they too are making drastic cuts in order to stay within budget. I will tell you first hand that the proposed budget cuts by Garcia (especially in the police/fire category) is going to hurt the city. You will have valuable people leave to other cities and will have low staffing levels, which is poor service to those who live in the city. Bring the Chargers to CV and that will bring more money to the city. I understand that some cuts need to be made, but dont make them so drastic! Come up with ideas that will bring money to the city instead of taking things away from the city.

Posted by SDrocks | reply to this comment
November 2, 2007 2:52 pm

Scott, you're on the right story but you missed an important point. The past budgets that increased salaries for police and fire and overspent on everything were passed by then-Mayor Steve Padilla and three of the current council members, Steve Castaneda, Jerry Rindone, and John McCann. They all covered up the truth and claimed that all was great in CV. Padilla lost re-election and he's gone. But Castaneda is running for re-election (while under felony indictments) and John McCann is a candidate for State Assembly. Why are you not asking those two candidates why they were so fiscally irresponsible with taxpayer dollars and how they can now run for election again with straight faces. I think it's time to hold those two accountable...and send them packing.

Posted by Joe6Pack | reply to this comment
November 3, 2007 7:25 am


Reader feedback
  • Users may post more than one comment, but should not pose as multiple users. Multiple posts from the same IP address but with a different user name on each will be reviewed to determine whether abuse has occurred.
  • Posts with overly personal attacks or unsubstantiated allegations may be edited or deleted.
  • Please be patient with the posts -- there may be a delay before they appear on the site -- and make sure to enter the code in the "image verification" box.
Post a comment
Name:
Email:
Comments:
Current Word Count: Verification Code
d4b24f8



MOST POPULAR STORIES:


Copyright © 2009 voiceofsandiego.org. All Rights Reserved.