voiceofsandiego.org: Cafesandiego... Debate Planning, Not War
an independent nonprofit |
March to 1,000 Members: 991 so far. Contribute today.

Debate Planning, Not War

Published: Tuesday, January 8, 2008 8:28 AM PST



As I participate in the voiceofsandiego.org blog, it's important to note that as the vice president for Blackwater West my comments will be based on our land use project in Potrero.  Being the VP for our training campus project here in California does not necessarily mean that I am the best spokesman for the company as it applies to Blackwater Worldwide training and operations. I will do what I can, but my comments and responses will be Potrero based.

As a start, and what seems to be on everyone’s mind is the Potrero Planning Board recall. As a lead-in, we believed the residents of Potrero would allow their planning group to do what county policy says they must: make a decision concerning a land use permit based solely on the land use impacts on the community of the proposed project. Unfortunately, Potrero residents became caught up in a political firestorm that was stoked by interests that did not care what Potrero residents wanted for their town.

The members of the planning group who were recalled attempted to do their job. They reviewed Blackwater’s proposed training facility that would occupy 140 acres of the 824 acre parcel off Round Potrero Road. They had questions about noise, traffic, and environmental impacts. Unfortunately for everyone involved, the county’s planning process is such that the environmental impact report, which would have provided answers to those and other questions, had not yet been released and we at Blackwater were prohibited by the process from providing the information requested at that time. It’s expected that the EIR will be released for review and comment in the next several months.

What then, was the sin these planning group members committed that they were subjected to recall? In the document in which they requested answers to questions about Blackwater’s proposed project, they “conditionally” approved it as being a compatible land use for that piece of land at that location in the county. They didn’t approve the project. They asked quite a few questions. And, as an aside, they mentioned that the proposed land use was acceptable given county planning and zoning guidelines.

That’s when the East County Democratic Club and Congressman Bob Filner inserted themselves into the process. They did not do so because of the land use concerns. They did not do so because they were concerned for the residents of Potrero. They did so to make a political statement about the war in Iraq and Blackwater’s role in the war as a trainer of independent contractors.

What Blackwater had hoped would be simply a land use issue turned into an opportunity for those who oppose President Bush and what they refer to as “his” war in Iraq. We chose not to participate in that debate, in large part because the anti-war group didn’t concern itself with the facts. 

The mere mention of Blackwater (or other private military companies) was enough to panic these anti-war activists and others. It is not surprising that these people refer to private contractors as “mercenaries.” The Oxford English Dictionary defines "mercenary" as "a professional soldier serving a foreign power." Blackwater does not now, nor has it ever, provided security services for, or on behalf of, any country other than the United States of America. Blackwater does not condone mercenaries and its private contractors do not deserve to be called that or any other number of epithets. Most Blackwater trained contractors are willing to put their lives on the line only because they are helping the American war effort. And in many cases, they have performed heroically.

Most Americans now believe Iraq was a bad idea. But since we are there, the U.S. government needs certain capabilities that they can't get from the military. The Diplomatic Security Service doesn't have enough agents to meet the demand, and they cannot simply go out and hire a few thousand highly trained agents overnight -- let alone let them all go once we finally get out. Contractors, like it or not, meet a need.

Security contractors play an important role supplementing troop strength by guarding static infrastructure, politicians and diplomats, and vital convoys. By doing so, they free up the uniformed members of the military for combat, patrols, raids and the other necessary roles that they play in a combat zone. There is no argument that the U.S. military is limited in size and that there have been difficulties in maintaining the elevated troop levels needed to provide the military stability required to suppress the various terrorist and militia insurgents and to prevent sectarian violence.

If private military companies are not allowed to operate in the Iraqi theater of operations, the estimated 50,000 armed contractors would be extremely difficult to replace. There has already been an outcry at the deployment of an additional 30,000 U.S. troops on the ground as a result of “the Surge.” To suddenly announce that we need tens of thousands of additional troops to babysit journalists and politicians, drive trucks, protect convoys, and guard diplomats would be absurd both politically and militarily.

You may not like what you have read or heard of Blackwater. However, most people realize that the only way to salvage something worthwhile out of Iraq is through diplomacy. That's not going to happen if our diplomats aren't safe.

In addition, back here in the U.S., since personnel cutbacks and wholesale military base closures in the 1980’s and 1990’s, there is a severe shortage of military and law enforcement personnel training facilities across the country.

The same budget shortfalls that beleaguer the federal government have taken a toll on state and local governments as well. In law enforcement, that means less costly training. For example, the Police Academy at Miramar College has a small defensive driving course. It’s scheduled to be paved over for parking soon. The next closest driving course is in San Bernardino. There is also a dearth of facilities where police personnel can conduct weapons training.

Blackwater’s training facility in North Carolina includes driving courses and firing ranges, which it makes available to local law enforcement. No public funds were expended in building or maintaining the facility and the cost of using the facility is often covered by state and federal grants.

The Potrero facility will include a driving course and areas for firearms training at no cost to local law enforcement. The same state and federal grants will allow San Diego County law enforcement personnel to make use of Blackwater’s facilities at a fraction of the cost that would be necessary if local law enforcement was required to build and operate their own facility.

We believed that San Diego County, with its well-known support for the military and defense industry companies like SAIC, General Atomics, Cubic, SPAWAR, and others, would welcome a facility that would generate $1.2 million for the local community and create about 60 jobs, while providing a sorely needed public service to our law enforcement community.

Unfortunately, that discussion never took place. All the anti-war protesters that descended on Potrero talked about were mercenaries and Iraq. We overestimated local residents’ ability to see through the anti-war, anti-Bush, and anti-military propaganda.

However, the process continues and Blackwater’s proposed training facility in Potrero will be decided upon by the County Board of Supervisors. Hopefully, they will stick to discussing the land use impacts of a 140-acre training facility on more than 800 acres outside the sparsely populated town of Potrero.

-- BRIAN BONFIGLIO




48 Comments so far on this story...

Just reading Brian Bonfiglio's public relations rationalization (spin) on the attempt of Blackwater to create a war mercenaries' training camp out in rural Potrero makes me want to weep. He cites all the right stuff: no public monies will be spent; limited area for police- training programs make this one a plus; tolerating irrational anti-Bush opponents; protecting our diplomats in Iraq; sympathy for the recalled Potrero elected officials who were "just doing their jobs," meddling by U.S. Congressman Bob Filner. The only item he missed mentioning is that Blackwater could help fight backcountry fires. What are you doing running this malarkey? Maybe you should look at Joe Deegan's recent Reader story about the oddly capricious SD County land use practices imposed on ordinary citizens who want to build a house in Potrero, instead of flacking for a bunch or private trigger-happy paramilitarists.

Posted by Fed Up | reply to this comment
January 7, 2008 8:07 pm

Sorry dude. There is no way you can justify paid mercenaries like yourselves. This is the worst spin I have heard about since Bush declared "mission accomplished" almost 2000 days ago.

Posted by Coast Watcher | reply to this comment
January 7, 2008 9:52 pm

Nice try Brian, but San Diegans are pretty smart. We know what a mercenary training camp is for...we know what campaign contributions are for...we know what liars-for-hire are for. It's not just the democrats and anti-war sentiment. It's your reputation for being merciless killers-for-hire who operate outside the law. San Diegans know that "private military contractors" is just a euphemism for MECENARIES, no matter how you spin it. Go back to the swamps, Blackwater!

Posted by Fred Williams | reply to this comment
January 7, 2008 10:02 pm

Fed Up: I agree that Brian Bonfiglio's post is pathetic (although humorously so - he says everything but 'I just wanna be loved, is that so wrong?') but I don't agree that voiceofsandiego should be criticized for posting the piece. Surely you can see that the opinions of a Blackwater executive are timely reading. Plus, they're a hoot! What could be more fun than reading Blackwater begging for public mercy? Pleading that they're not mercenaries? I love it! The best part is when he disses Potrero as 'sparsely populated'! They may be, but they still kicked your butt, didn't they Brian?

Posted by Austin Lynch | reply to this comment
January 7, 2008 11:10 pm

These guys are building this with taxpayer dollars from their NO BID GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS, yet they say no public dollars will be spent??? All their dollars are public dollars! How stupid do they think we are? This is really insulting!

Posted by This is awful! | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 12:08 am

I'm sure that the Potrero residents would LOVE to have a bunch of drunken Blackwater guys, who have no accountability for their behavior, as their neighbors. Potrero is such a beautiful and tranquil place, what a shame!

Posted by Powegian | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 7:09 am

Just what this country need - a private military! Yeah, right! Have you seen these guys? They are a scary bunch! I have pictures of the these people acting like they are shooting at Potrero residents!

Posted by Banana Republic | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 7:23 am

Blackwater should train in space! The company, their executives, their employees, their mission is a bunch of crap! War is WRONG. We don't need a bunch of killers in our backyard of San Diego. Fight Potrero, FIGHT and if our city supervisors who are so busy flip flopping around foreign countries don't fight for you....we need to fired there wimpy behinds! By the way...what does Ron Roberts do when he is in Asia? HMMMM?

Posted by Norman | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 8:08 am

The residents of Potrero have every right to deny your organization the ability to ruin their peaceful community. Take your business elsewhere. You're not wanted here.

Posted by Larry | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 8:44 am

I pray that the people of Portrero and San Diego County do not fall for his pubic relations spin on Blackwater's evil and tarnished image. I do not want these people training my law enforcement officers or anybody else for that matter. Brutality is wrong -- no matter who is doing it. Please call or write your County Supervisors and tell them that under no circumstances should Blackwater be allowed in S.D. County.

Posted by Shelley | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 9:11 am

Really, don't insult the minds of Potrero residents. It wasn't about politics or war, it WAS a land use decision. The residents didn't want that land use in their neighborhood. Just like residents of North Park want smoke shops to go away; just like residents of Point Loma object to the girly bars on Midway. Now, don't YOU turn this into politics by blaming Democrats, Bob Filner, anti-Bush Americans. And don't you DARE equate those us that love our military but object to privatized mercenaries to being "anti-military".. that is not the same. Go get a job at Fox, your logic seems lock step with them. And if you really love America, take the overhead and cost overruns you charge the defense budget and encourage its use to improve the lives of military families and wounded vets' health.

Posted by Tom S. | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 9:28 am

I was hoping that I would be able to actually read some facts here but once you get to the end of the original post, they end. It is obvious that the people responding, as usual, are the ones that have an agenda that will get Obama or Ron Paul elected in November. I wish poeple would at least say they are against the war, hate GWB and are true Liberal Dems that will not listen to any FACTS. I hope that Brian and Blackwater do not take the time to actually respond to any of the nut job comments posted here!!

Posted by Nutz | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 9:38 am

It should be possible to separate the issues regarding Blackwater and address them more appropriately. Blackwater's favorable contract terms are not in the public interest and need renegotiating, and the US Government is equally to blame with Blackwater for that arrangement. Blackwater's gross misbehavior at times in Iraq also must be addressed. However, let's separate for consideration the fact that the US Government needs to hire contractors for some operations. Given that need, there should be support for training those contractors properly. We are not going to eliminate the need for Blackwater-type contractors in the foreseeable future, so let's fix the contracting system and properly train the personnel involved in it.

Posted by drpaddle | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 9:39 am

The ride to Potrero is beautiful. Two years ago I found the general store and post office employees friendly and helpful- there is NO WAY I could have gotten where I needed to go without local directions. The idea of helicopters flying overhead and tools (mercenaries) racing cars back from getting drunk at the beach is disturbing. Honestly, I fail to see the benefit to the citizens of Potrero- trade in your horse farms and bucolic life for that of a mini-military town. But that is Potrero's decision, and they decided. No posting here will change that- sorry Brian. Nothing in California law allows you, or us, to ram a decision down their throat. God Bless the USA!

Posted by Omni-Potent | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 9:52 am

The ride to Potrero is beautiful. Two years ago I found the general store and post office employees friendly and helpful- there is NO WAY I could have gotten where I needed to go without local directions. The idea of helicopters flying overhead and tools (mercenaries) racing cars back from getting drunk at the beach is disturbing. Honestly, I fail to see the benefit to the citizens of Potrero- trade in your horse farms and bucolic life for that of a mini-military town. But that is Potrero's decision, and they decided. No posting here will change that- sorry Brian. Nothing in California law allows you, or us, to ram a decision down their throat. God Bless the USA!

Posted by Omni-Potent | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 9:52 am

Back to land use: Who would think that a change from agricultural to military base is an appropriate use for our county's back country?

Posted by Steve K | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 9:53 am

Nutz, Please don't look for FACTS once you get passed the "original post," you will not find any. Look at the posts as if it were the Potrero Recall, the entire thing is like a puppet. The puppets have strings leading back to one person, Ray Lutz. Take a look at his websites and what he has been putting out over the past few months, the points being made here are nothing new, they have been made over and over by the same people, we are stuck in RUTZ. I am sure that the new members of the Potrero Planning Group will use them as well. The question is will Ray and his puppets be able to get the County Supervisors to take into account things that have nothing to do with a land-use issue.

Posted by Rutz | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 10:10 am

A mercenary is a soldier of fortune that will sell his services to any bidder. Blackwater is a mercenary organization that currently sells to the US President and Sec. of Defense. But it can't be trusted; there are no meaningful oversights on its operations and these armed and trained men represent a grave danger to anyone near them. Blackwater is akin to the Condottieri of medaeval Florence, which hired mercenaries in its wars with Pisa and Sienna and who wound up controlling Florence by threat of arms, just alike any other bully with a gun might. Everything about the organization stinks of a death squad in waiting and if their 'employees' are so anxious to fight, the US army is more than willing to take all they can get. Enlist, Bonfiglio---and take your dirty brigands with you.

Posted by Blackwater is sewage | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 10:14 am

Brian, isn't it true that Blackwater has hired foreign nationals such as former Chilean and Salvadoran soldiers to provide security services in Iraq? Wouldn't you call them mercenaries?

Posted by SanDiegoPolitico | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 10:18 am

Ask yourself, 'Am I safer with a bunch killers for hire, armed with a vast array of state of the art weaponry, who answer to no one but the President or Secretary of Defense and able to target anyone they choose with impunity, or should I step out into busy traffic without first looking both ways?' The answer is to take your chances with the traffic. That would give you at least a 50-50 chance. Blackwater is a surefire disaster of crimal proportions waiting to happen; they mirror exactly what formed the death squads of many south american nations who answered only to their nations' leaders and America shouldn't make anyplace home to that---or them.

Posted by Blackwater is sewage | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 10:26 am

The County Planning Department!

Posted by Answer to Steve K | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 10:40 am

To SD Politico: I am not whom you posed your question to but I do know that the TCNs (or the Chilean/Salvadorans) are what they call static guards. They stand guard at doors and open them as appropriate. Much like the Brinks guys at the Bank. They not only do not interact with the locals or go out of the Green Zone but do not leave the camp. If you really want to believe that is a mercenary, then enjoy yourself! The truth hasn't stopped anyone opposed to Blackwater thus far. Knock yourself out....

Posted by Answer | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 10:43 am

Hey, “Omni Potent,” Helicopters flying around and drunken soldiers driving to and fro are what you are concerned about? Well, stay away from North Island, Miramar & Camp Pendleton.

Posted by Amazed | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 10:46 am

Okay, so we all oppose the War. We oppose the President. We oppose the Defense Department giving away money with no-bid contracts. We are against “brutality,” I guess of any kind. We are against mercenaries and death squads. And we are against stepping out into traffic without looking both ways. But God forbid anyone accusing us of not supporting our troops or not loving our country. Come on, people, just listen to yourselves! I guess this is where you start citing the Constitution and talking about free speech? I’ve got an idea. Let’s allow free speech, but only if it makes sense. That would leave this page pretty much blank!

Posted by Only sane person here | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 10:51 am

"We overestimated local residents’ ability to see through the anti-war, anti-Bush, and anti-military propaganda." Hahahahahahaha...nic job there winning hearts and minds in your community. I see Blackwater trains its flacks to deal with American citizens in the same way it trains its operatives to deal with the Iraqis. You can't even follow your own advice, expecting us to take at face value that the only workable Iraq strategies are the ones that "need" Blackwater's services, especially the ones you finagled through no-bid contracts. I'm an opponent of Bush, of the "war", and of violent policies in general, but unlike yourself, I can respect and acknowledge San Diego's appreciation of its legitimate military. If us slobs are really as brainwashed against the military as you say, where are the big protests at Coronado, Miramar, SPAWAR, Pendleton, MCRD...? No dude, it's just you.

Posted by 3fingerspointback | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 11:23 am

Wow. What alot of mis-informed people on this site. I am a paramedic on a law enforcement tactical team and a military reservist. I have been to Iraq several times and seen Blackwater and other security contractors at work. No one is perfect but they perform, as a whole, much better than regular military forces I saw who came under fire. Why? Because, the largest bulk of them are former military special operations forces or still in the reserves and they respond with calm and professionalism. None of the debate over deployed security contractors has anything to do with Potrero, however. The Potrero facility is supposed to be to train military, law enforcement and other public service personnel. We NEED this facility. How can you be against training the forces who protect your right to make the kind of free (yet ignorant) speech on this site?

Posted by public servant | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 11:43 am

Most of these posts are just plain garbage. You complain about the "drunken, helicopter flying, mercinaries" believe me those are not Blackwater personnel. I live in Potrero and the drunks driving up and down the roads are the residents. They openly buy their beer and drink it on the porch of the Potrero Store, toss their cans in the trash and hop in their vehicles. The helicopters flying overhead are Military, Border Patrol, and law enforcement. The mercinaries are just figments of the "Lutz puppets" imaginations. The land proposed for the Blackwater West site is a defunct chicken ranch. The military/law enforcement training site would be a vast improvement over the lands current use. People say the 60 jobs that will be available for local residents is nothing, but 60 jobs out of a population of 864 people is substantial.

Posted by Potrero facts | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 1:02 pm

OK Blackwater. You won, when you duped this country into war. You spend millions funding political campaigns for the war. And got a President to spend trillions of taxpayer dollars on private contractors like you. And now you are against the war, saying "Most Americans now believe Iraq was a bad idea." So why are you crying about a little profit-making machine that will be abandoned when the spoils of the war stop?

Posted by American Taxpayer | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 1:34 pm

Correction- the County Board of Supervisors can ignore the "advisory" opinion of the Potrero planning board. However, in a utopian, USA-like society the Supervisors will respect the opinion of the Potrero board. I imagine there could be a legal challenge to the decision if proper procedure isn't followed. So, I should say there is no California law that can ram the decision down the County's throat. AMAZED- exactly: drunken military types everywhere (and if I was in the military I'd probably be one of them) but the Potrero community voiced their preference. That's the point- they can vote to keep them out, and simply pray the Supervisors listen. Wouldn't a state like Montana actually WANT a group of clowns like this in their backyard?

Posted by Omni-Potent | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 2:01 pm

Brian well knows that we've been processing this as a land-use question. I proudly admit that I saw through the lies that got us into this quagmire in Iraq, and I've been against the action there from the start. And, Blackwater has done a poor job of maintaining control of their mercenary soldiers on the ground. However, the citing of this private training facility in a residential area and as part of an agricultural preserve has been and will continue to be fought on the basis of land-use. That does not mean it is not going to become political, as these things frequently do. But it's a nonpartisan question. Even self-described "conservative republican" Ken King (52nd CD candidate) is against the project on the basis of property rights. Who wants to have a shooting range next door? Potrero residents are more sophisticated than Blackwater imagined. It's time to pull the project, Brian.

Posted by Raymond Lutz | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 2:04 pm

These posts are so emotioanl that even omni-potent is now insulting the state of montana?! I hope the board of supervisors dont tune in because they will be getting a great laugh out of all of this. Yep - lets recall the supervisors as well - that makes a lot of sense. I guess since the anti-war and Bush emotional combatants keep addressing politics it wont be hard for blackwater to be approved based on the eir and land use matter. Im thinking you have all attached your cart to the wrong donkey and should be focusing on whats real, not preceived. but hey, maybe my unemotional thinking is getting in the way of being confused by the facts... Its so obvious that I bet its blackwater that is writing and cultivating all the anti-war comments and you are playing right into it.

Posted by misinformed | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 2:29 pm

Planners were recalled because the citizens of Potrero overwhelming oppose Blackwater specifically because of legitimate land use issues! The Harris wildfire started in Potrero, amid 100 mph Santa Ana winds. Just imagine if Blackwater's armory full of explosive ammunition had been in place. Shooting ranges at other military bases commonly CAUSE wildfires - the last thing people in burned-out Potrero need! Blackwater will bring noise and traffic. People don't want a loud vehicle training track with sirens and lights day and night, right on the edge of federal wilderness. And how about the wildlife that already lost so much habitat in the fires? Are we to despoil what's left, too? Sierra Club believes Blackwater will pollute and poison the town's only source of drinking water, its aquifer, within a year. Cleanup could cost $1 billion and take 50 years. Bonfiglio claims opponents are all anti-war outsiders. Don't be fooled!

Posted by Truth, please! | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 2:34 pm

Why is ray lutz writing about land use when its my understanding that he is involved in the east county democratic club. Is it now part of their charter to be land use subject matter experts? I think not, so why would I listen to a political party member when wanting to find out about land use effects. Case in point, the police range right off the highway in a "residential area". Its also hard to determine land use issues when the Environmental Impact Report has not been released to the public. There are no legitimate land use issues as "truth, please" has indicated for the planning board members being recalled. Sorry new planning board members, your timing was off to proceed with a recall and blame it on EIR issues. I am sure that our elected officials see the same.

Posted by what land use issues? | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 2:40 pm

Response to 'Truth please'(comment #32): Thanks for bringing up the firefighting topic and specifically the Harris Fire (I'm a firefighter)...OK, you want the Truth...Blackwater would make that whole area much safer for brush fires that blow into that area frequently (2 in the last 2 years)...In reviewing the plans for the BW facility in Potrero I also see huge application for various forms of wildland firefighting, wilderness rescue, technical rescue and off-road vehicle training. In speaking directly with the BW VP Mr. Bonfiglio at the 'Protest' (attended mostly by out-of-towners from San Francisco & NY), he has already agreed to open the on-site bunkhouses as a fire camp for those of us who might deploy there on a wildland strike-team. I see nothing but improvements ahead for the community of Potrero thanks to Blackwater. Why try to block progress just because you are scared and not informed?

Posted by public servant | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 2:41 pm

"Truth please" is obviously not from Potrero. We are not "burnt out" at least not by the Harris Fire. Why not wait and see what the EIR reports instead of quoting what the Sierra club THINKS! What do you think the chicken manure, trash dumps, buried vehicles, and human waste (from residents without proper septic systems) is doing to the aquifer. Blackwater would be bound by the County to maintain and monitor their effects on the groundwater. Accountability is part of their proposal.

Posted by Potrero facts | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 3:01 pm

As a 22 year resident of Potrero, I am very much against the Blackwater facility being built here. The only road to that facility is the one I live on, and the county has said that road is not adequate for the traffic Blackwater would generate. Who says there would be 60 new jobs? Last I heard, there would be 5 new jobs for civilians in this area. The Potrero planning group was recalled for refusing to listen to the citizens of Potrero and for publicizing slanderous comments about those citizens. I had no complaints about the chicken ranch that had been on the property Blackwater wants to use. They were good neighbors and an appropitate use for that land.

Posted by helen_cramer@juno.com | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 3:02 pm

Unlike some of the more cowardly on this site I will gladly use my name when asking where is the authority for organizations like Blackwater to even exist. By this, I mean the authority for a bunch of heavily armed men, with military issue automatic weapons, to be deployed to a foreign and sovereign nation? For that matter, where's the authority for them to exist within our own nation? Individuals cannot carry a simple handgun without a permit in most jurisdictions, how then can a bunch of them have and use automatic rifles, which are forbidden to the regular citizens, either here or elsewhere? Are these Blackwater "boys with toys" special citizens? Even suggesting that most of these gun-happy goons of Blackwater are just interested in serving their country is beyond laughable. Is that why are they paid so highly paid?

Posted by Tom Comeau | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 6:47 pm

Permitting Blackwater in Potrero is a decision now in the hands of our County Board of Supervisors: they can over-rule the Potrero Planning group and give Blackwater the green light. Or they can follow the lead of Potrero citizens and give Blackwater the gate. Shelley (post #10) correctly notes the need for everyone who finds this notion a travesty to contact the five Republican Supervisors and express your support for keeping Blackwater out of Potrero. I don't know when there will be a hearing on this issue, but the Supervisors' phone number is (619) 531-5700. Call, and tell your friends and families.

Posted by Fed Up | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 8:36 pm

Potrero planning board recall was an exemplary utilization of the democratic process,a battle won without a shot;that's something to be proud of.Whichever side one is on,standing up for our beliefs makes democracy work,something to be remembered by the 'losers'.Don't be sore.Take it gracefully.It was a fair fight.Congratulation to the 'winners.'Of course Mr Lutz is an organizer.To get the job done,obviously it had to be organized.Good job Ray.However,I think the Land Use issue should be the primary focus,largely for credibility.Round Potrero valley is special and needs to be protected for posterity.Please.No one seems to be talking about it.Beat Blackwater,then what?Precious little of S.D. County is left unspoiled.Developers and others will wreck every inch for greed if allowed.Military is neither good for nor appropriate to Potrero for reasons already stated by others above.Indeed it is an insult to taxpayers to fatten Prince's wallet with Blackwater's no-bid war-profiteeting contracts.Hog-in-tro

Posted by NMEileen | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 9:55 pm

Potrero planning board recall was an exemplary utilization of the democratic process,a battle won without a shot;that's something to be proud of.Whichever side one is on,standing up for our beliefs makes democracy work,something to be remembered by the 'losers'.Don't be sore.Take it gracefully.It was a fair fight.Congratulation to the 'winners.'Of course Mr Lutz is an organizer.To get the job done,obviously it had to be organized.Good job Ray.However,I think the Land Use issue should be the primary focus,largely for credibility.Round Potrero valley is special and needs to be protected for posterity.Please.No one seems to be talking about it.Beat Blackwater,then what?Precious little of S.D. County is left unspoiled.Developers and others will wreck every inch for greed if allowed.Military is neither good for nor appropriate to Potrero for reasons already stated by others above.Indeed it is an insult to taxpayers to fatten Prince's wallet with Blackwater's no-bid war-profiteeting contracts.Hog-in-tro

Posted by NMEileen | reply to this comment
January 8, 2008 9:55 pm

Your PR work is eloquent as usual throughout your blog, right up to the 2nd to the last paragraph. We overestimated local residents ability to see through the anti-war, anti-Bush, anti-military propaganda. Most residents voted for Bush and many are retired military. Perhaps you UNDERESTIMATED our passion to stop you from spoiling our countryside. This is indeed a land use/misuse issue.

Posted by Potrero resident Randy | reply to this comment
January 9, 2008 12:18 am

I thought Bonfiglio was going to address the land-use issue . . . He claims that land-use is the core of the issue and then doesn't even attempt to defend Blackwater on that front. No matter how eloquent you are, Blackwater is indefensible on that front and all other fronts.

Posted by Pat Ferguson | reply to this comment
January 9, 2008 8:43 am

If it weren't for the opposition from Potrero residents, I believe that Blackwater would be a good neighbor and would provide much service to the Potrero area and beyond. I have personally spoken to Brian about the pair of eagles that reside on the property. They plan to make a habitat that has been defined for purposes of "Eagle Habitat" only and will not be trespassed upon at any time by anyone. I don't think the residents of Potrero can say that now. It only takes a very small amount of trespassing upon an eagles territory for it to take flight to another location. I don't live in Potrero and if Blackwater was moving to my neighborhood I admit I might think differently, but I think I would prefer Blackwater to many homes that would destroy our habitat much more that they would.

Posted by Lynn Neff | reply to this comment
January 9, 2008 12:37 pm

So, Public Servant, according to you, the Blackwater forces are superior in skill sets to the US military because they're former special forces? That almost makes sense if you've marinated your outlook in Soldier of Fortune and the ideals of privitization, but the logic falls flat when you consider that these mercenaries were originally trained by the US military--at public expense--and owe their ability to fight to that training. Do you say that the US military can't train adequate fighting forces? If you do, I'd be happy to introduce you to a few dozen marines I know who could prove your assertions fatally incorrect. Perhaps your own education level is nothing to speak of in a military sense--and since you're here instead of there your skills probably weren't deemed too necessary even in a short-handed theatre of battle. Of all the comments meant to support Blackwater, yours is the lamest.

Posted by Blackwater is sewage | reply to this comment
January 10, 2008 9:46 am

I agree with Austin Lynch that voiceofsandiego was right in allowing this post...it's important to know your enemy...and Blackwater is an enemy of America, make no mistake, these people operating in our state has more potential for disaster then it has for profit. Just ask the people of New Orleans when Blackwater came to "help" them during Katrina.

Posted by Dahgrostab'ph-r-i | reply to this comment
January 10, 2008 4:58 pm

I'm not sure what civilian law enforcement agency would dare to admit to Blackwater training. Not after all Blackwaters gratuitos gunning down of Iraqi civilians who had the nerve to get in their way. God forbid Blackwater training should come up in excessive use of force lawsuits. It would be like an admission of guilt. Also this County has a strong tradition of supporting our brave fighting men and women. Blackwater goons are well known for the disrespect they show to Soldiers and Marines in Iraq and Afghanistan. They have forced soldiers to lay on the ground at gun point. Ignored Marine Officers orders to clear their weapons or put them on safety in secure areas. And Blackwater goons got road rage at a Green Zone check point and gassed our own troops. Un freaking believable that they would think they are welcome here.

Posted by wow | reply to this comment
January 11, 2008 9:23 pm

-Potrero residents did allow our PPG to make a decision on Blackwater land use impacts on Potrero. Problem was, their vote did not reflect the opinion of 90% of their constituents. -I have viewed the document submitted by the PPG to the County showing their unanimous approval of the Blackwater Project. I see no questions listed there, only a request for a live fire noise test. Is this a joke? How do you duplicate 300 shooters at 15 firing ranges? How about environmental issues and ruining the character of our quiet, unspoiled community? -Bob Filner is Potrero's Congressional Rep. A better question is, why did Duncan Hunter, Supervisor Diane Jacob and Blackwater meet privately prior to public knowledge of the project? -Bonfiglio's suggestion that those who oppose his ill-conceived project are unpatriotic should offend everyone who loves this country.

Posted by The Potrero-ist | reply to this comment
January 13, 2008 4:38 am

Putting a military training base in Potrero...what the hell were they thinking? Potrero is such a quite and peaceful place. Military occupation is just not appropriate: period! And, yeah...Potrero's residents are no idiots. I strongly urge everybody to stand up and oppose this: "No to the exploitation of and no to the militarization of Potrero." Yeah, Mr. Bonfiglio is "right" about one thing, this is no longer about planning, this is about war to perserve our peaceful country way of life. Please support this cause. Thank you.

Posted by Chris Dam | reply to this comment
April 9, 2008 12:20 am


Reader feedback
  • Users may post more than one comment, but should not pose as multiple users. Multiple posts from the same IP address but with a different user name on each will be reviewed to determine whether abuse has occurred.
  • Posts with overly personal attacks or unsubstantiated allegations may be edited or deleted.
  • Please be patient with the posts -- there may be a delay before they appear on the site -- and make sure to enter the code in the "image verification" box.
Post a comment
Name:
Email:
Comments:
Current Word Count: Verification Code
ce59fe1



MOST POPULAR STORIES:


Copyright © 2009 voiceofsandiego.org. All Rights Reserved.