Addressing Global Warming

Published: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 12:51 PM PST

E-MAIL STORY

Readers GreenMachine and JR point out that there are other factors, in addition to recycling, which need to be addressed vigilantly in order to make San Diego, and society as whole, greener and more sustainable.

Waste reduction and recycling efforts do help minimize greenhouse gas emissions. But we, too, recognize these are just some of the measures needed to address an airport’s overall carbon footprint. The United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change estimated that the aviation industry contributes to about 3.5 percent of global warming caused by human activities.

Aviation’s most significant contribution comes from the combustion of jet fuel during aircraft flights, which produces greenhouse gases predominantly in the form of carbon dioxide. Other aviation sources of greenhouse gases include emissions from airport ground service equipment, airport-related transportation vehicles (e.g., shuttles, buses, trucks and autos), energy used in airport buildings, airport construction projects, and aircraft manufacturing.

Understanding this, the Airport Authority is now in the process of assessing a carbon footprint for San Diego International Airport (SDIA) and developing programs to reduce our overall greenhouse gas emissions, which come from both aircraft and airport operations.

In all our efforts, we strive for SDIA to serve as a role model for best sustainable practices in the region and in the aviation industry. We see the Airport Authority as part of a much larger community and recognize that, when it comes to the matter of global warming and greenhouse gas emissions, we are all part of the problem, and all part of the solution.

-- PAUL MANASJAN

2 Comments so far on this story...

Here's a thought to help the airport make the skies greener; refuse to land or service aircraft known to be ''gross polluters'' of the sky. That could be really easy to do, too. Just say that mechanics are in short supply, as are fuel trucks, chewing gum and baling wire, etc., and A/C equipped with smoky, thirsty, JP5-quaffing engines will go elsewhere. That could be done without tomorrow without even hiring a lawyer or calling a press conference. And you could recycle the aluminum, too.

Posted by JR | reply to this comment
January 16, 2008 4:32 pm

San Diego's noise regulation already restricts the use of what would be considered "gross poluters".

Posted by Gross Poluters? | reply to this comment
January 16, 2008 7:15 pm

Reader feedback

Users may post more than one comment, but should not pose as multiple users. Multiple posts from the same IP address but with a different user name on each will be reviewed to determine whether abuse has occurred.
Posts with overly personal attacks or unsubstantiated allegations may be edited or deleted.
Please be patient with the posts -- there may be a delay before they appear on the site -- and make sure to enter the code in the "image verification" box.