voiceofsandiego.org: Slop... All Good?
an independent nonprofit |
March to 1,000 Members: 991 so far. Contribute today.

All Good?

Published: Tuesday, December 25, 2007 7:28 PM PST



Before the holiday break, I got an update of sorts from Chula Vista City Manager David Garcia on his progress dealing with that city's financial crisis.

Remember, according to Garcia not too long ago, the city was on the verge of insolvency. He called to say things had changed.

Garcia's staff gained approval from the City Council to cut 140 city positions. But as Garcia admitted, only "about 10" city employees were actually going to say goodbye to City Hall. The others would find placement in a vacant post in the city.

The city may have been on the route to insolvency but shifting people into new posts has, according to Garcia, changed that.

To a point.

He said the city found itself still $1.3 million short after cutting those positions. Remember I wrote that Garcia was going to ask for concessions from Chula Vista's employee unions. Garcia gave me a report of how that went.

He said all the unions agreed to forego the raises they expected this year for six months, in exchange the city agreed to give them a variety of little things. For the firefighters, for example, Garcia said the city agreed to kick them back one-fourth of their expected raise in one lump payment in exchange for them not getting the full raise for half the year.

I know, it's a brain twister, but it apparently resulted in savings.

Chula Vista's employees all signed five year contracts and they all expect raises well into the future.

So while Garcia may have saved enough money to make it through this year, it remains to be seen whether the city's revenues will grow as fast as its employees' salaries will.

As Garcia pointed out, Chula Vista spends about 80 percent of its budget on employee salaries and benefits compared to about 70 percent for most other cities in the region.

And the workers are expecting raises. Garcia said he couldn't do anything to change that.

"For whatever reason, we entered into five year contracts that were very lucrative. I couldn't undo them if I wanted to, the question is, how best to manage them," Garcia said.

For the city to manage those rising salaries in coming years, one and/or two things need to happen. Either the money coming into the city will rise to meet the need. This can come from either a booming economy, or through increased taxes and fees. The city's already boosted things like parking meter costs. In the absence of that, the city would have to go through cuts, ostensibly cuts that actually cut the number of people that actually work for City Hall.

With the housing market still bleak and the state declaring a fiscal emergency, the likelihood that Chula Vista's going to see indefinitely rising revenues seems rather remote.

But Garcia wasn't ready to worry about that yet. He said the opening of State Route 125 through South County was timely. The Otay Ranch Town Center, Garcia said, was filled with shoppers.

Maybe that meant things were changing for Chula Vista -- a brighter future was on the way.

Garcia admitted he'd have to wait to see if the parking lot was full after Christmas before he got too excited with the idea that Chula Vista's crisis was just a 2007 thing. If it's not, moving around employees and putting off their raises just won't cut it.

-- SCOTT LEWIS




14 Comments so far on this story...

Gosh, for some reason it appears that they are saddled with lucrative, longterm contracts. Not to worry, Garcia is doing a good job shifting bonus money to rework the salary cap, thereby delaying huge lump sum payments that would devastate the team until billions in future TV and luxury box revenue make up the difference. Oh, wait a sec. I thought we were talking about the Chula Vista Chargers, not the Chula Vista City. My mistake. He's doomed.

Posted by JAD | reply to this comment
December 25, 2007 9:18 pm

Chula Vista is selling a shell game! The City Manager & Mayor don’t mind crying poverty when it suits them. They also don’t mind pretending to be the “rich uncle” when it comes to wining and dining Tennessee’s Gaylord and the San Diego Chargers. “Come on now, public, find the pea and win a prize.” The only positive possibility is that at the bacchanal Gaylord falls in love with Mayor Cox and sweeps her off her feet (and out of our city) to take her back to Tennessee. Happy New Year!

Posted by Simon | reply to this comment
December 26, 2007 5:44 am

Are they funding their pensions? This is a city in trouble like all small municipalities. I hope to hell they aren't thinking a deal with the Chargers will bail them out! link

Posted by Coast Watcher | reply to this comment
December 26, 2007 11:30 am

Theyre going BK mark my words.

Posted by Billy Bob Henry | reply to this comment
December 26, 2007 1:56 pm

The city will never really resolve its financial crisis until it: 1. Actually looks at each department's budget line by line to find where savings can be taken, 2. Changes its unsustainable fiscal reliance upon residential development, which always results in a deficit for the city. 3. Makes a major overhaul of its flawed GPU that is essentially a gift to residential developers and if ever implemented would really put the city into major debt. 4. Focuses on real economic development-living wage jobs with benefits at sustainable industries and businesses. 5. Stops borrowing from reserves and development fees to prop up unsustainable expenditures.www.chu (issue two)

Posted by Theresa | reply to this comment
December 26, 2007 3:37 pm

Scott, the title of your last article on Chula Vista "Cooking The Books" says it all. That's what they are doing. Moving expenses around and assigning them new catagories. Eliminating jobs, but NOT elimnating the employees. Wow ! What a lesson in Creative Financing ! It is obvious that Chula Vista has big financial problems, and they are not alone. The present financial slump will have its effect on every city. Some cities will be more insulated from it than others.

Posted by San Marcos says, | reply to this comment
December 27, 2007 9:28 am

"For whatever reason, we entered into five year contracts that were very lucrative. I couldn't undo them if I wanted to, the question is, how best to manage them," Garcia said. It sure makes me wonder what lucrative contract Mr. Garcia entered into when coming to Chula Vista!!

Posted by Sappo | reply to this comment
December 27, 2007 3:11 pm

The Mayor and City Council are clearly responsible for all of this mess. To try and drop this on Garcia and the City staff is a bit overly simplistic. The Mayor (THIS Mayor, not the previous one) and Council are typically in denial about the realities of modern governance. A city, like a business, needs to raise revenue and lower expenses, or at least keep them in balance. The Mayor and Council do not want to admit that simple fact. I have no problem with tax generating development (ie Gaylord) but this obsession with the Charger Stadium is really shameful. It doesn't raise one dime of taxes. It will however drain the city of its resources like a drain pipe in a bathtub.

Posted by SouthBayGuy | reply to this comment
December 28, 2007 8:19 am

The problem is clear. 80% of their budget is employee salaries & benefits, as opposed to 70% for most municipalities. That's a rough difference of $30 million a year. Link to proposed budget: link [PDF]. Find things you believe are wasteful and contact the council.

Posted by Anonymous | reply to this comment
December 29, 2007 1:25 am

Anonymous above sounds like someone who is on the Council or works on the staff of a councilmember. Why doesn't the Council "find things that are wasteful" and do something about it? Don't put it on the public to do the job they are hired to do (after all, they volunteered to run for office).

Posted by SouthBayGuy | reply to this comment
December 30, 2007 4:58 pm

The story is all one sided, the city manager's side, there was no salary cuts by all the unions and the city manager is playing a shell game and you are just helping him.

Posted by Chula Vista Employee | reply to this comment
December 30, 2007 10:00 pm

11. Chula Vista Employee wrote on December 31, 2007 12:00 AM: "The story is all one sided, the city manager's side, there was no salary cuts by all the unions and the city manager is playing a shell game and you are just helping him. ............. POLITICIANS playing shell games, NO, I do not believe it! Next you will tell us that they will say and do anything to stay in office, no matter how bad it is for the citizens!

Posted by Billy Bob Henry | reply to this comment
January 1, 2008 5:35 pm

The City Management refuses to cut the fat in their own kitchen. Instead they put it on the employees of the City. By convincing them it was their responsibility to help the City out during this financial crisis. So the employees delay their agreed upon pay raises. While the Mayor and City Council get a pay raise, which they say they had no control over. The employees did this on good faith with really no benefit except a small (few Dollars) and the back end. With the ink not even dry yet, the City has now opened up new job announcements for another Asst. City Manager. A job, which Garcia claimed he would freeze. Is the City Council hiding some of its monies in order to fund the Charger Stadium and Bay Front projects? A good investigative reporter should look into this.

Posted by CVRES | reply to this comment
January 9, 2008 9:24 am

SouthBayGuy, I'm a 20 year student and resident of Chula Vista. I am not connected to the council whatsoever. I'm just an informed citizen, who doesn't like waste. Like Benjamin Franklin said, "Beware of little expenses. A small leak will sink a great ship."

Posted by Anonymous | reply to this comment
January 22, 2008 11:01 pm


Reader feedback
  • Users may post more than one comment, but should not pose as multiple users. Multiple posts from the same IP address but with a different user name on each will be reviewed to determine whether abuse has occurred.
  • Posts with overly personal attacks or unsubstantiated allegations may be edited or deleted.
  • Please be patient with the posts -- there may be a delay before they appear on the site -- and make sure to enter the code in the "image verification" box.
Post a comment
Name:
Email:
Comments:
Current Word Count: Verification Code
75f0224

Scott Lewis on Politics

The Scott Lewis on Politics blog, abbreviated cleverly as SLOP, is a collection of observations, insights and the occasional scoop on public affairs in San Diego. Please feel free to e-mail Scott at scott.lewis@voiceofsandiego.org.


Listen to voiceofsandiego.org's radio program on AM 600 KOGO: Latest Episode (October 18): Andrew Donohue and Scott Lewis talk in depth about the Chargers stadium search, municipal bankruptcy and whether residents are too dumb to vote on the City Hall project.

Subscribe to the Podcast Feed



MOST POPULAR STORIES:



MOST POPULAR STORIES:


Copyright © 2009 voiceofsandiego.org. All Rights Reserved.