voiceofsandiego.org: Slop... Raid the TMD!
an independent nonprofit |
Support This Service

Raid the TMD!

Published: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 2:44 PM PST



Steve Francis had a lot of trouble articulating his position on whether he'll leave the door open to new or increased taxes for the city. More on that later. But on a couple of other points, he was clear as day and my eyes got big.

Francis took a page from one of my favorite books and said one of the first things he would do is demand that the newly formed Tourist Marketing District , or TMD, take over the financing of the Convention Center.

He also said that downtown redevelopment money should be used to pay the annual debt payments for Petco Park.

These are two immediate policy changes that could save city coffers millions for use on everything from public safety equipment to parks and infrastructure. Francis' team estimates the savings at $15 million.

They are two different issues as well but both have been given the same cold shoulder.
Francis may want to look out, the hoteliers won't be happy.
That downtown redevelopment funds can pay for the annual debt obligations of the city is an idea that Councilwoman Donna Frye and former banker Peter Q. Davis have floated along with several others. It makes total sense. The ballpark is downtown and downtown funds can be used to pay for it. The Centre City Development Corp. may have dreams about how better that money can be used but the City Council controls that money. They can choose to spend it on a library and other luxuries downtown, but everyone should be aware that they are choosing those things over funds for vital, crumbling infrastructure in other parts of the city.

Francis said he wants to make a different choice.

Now, as for the TMD, Francis was obviously skeptical of its formation. In case you can't quite place it, the TMD came about when various hotels across the city declared themselves a sort-of virtual neighborhood that could, like Little Italy, vote to levy a special tax on its member businesses.

But the interesting thing about this tax is that it is not a tax on the businesses, the hotels, it’s a tax on the visitors to the hotels. The hotels plan to use the money to pay wholly for promotion of San Diego as a destination. Essentially, the hoteliers found a way to pool resources for a marketing effort and pass the costs -- penny for penny -- along to their customers without worrying about laws that prohibit businesses from all joining together to raise their prices uniformly (as in price fixing schemes).

This isn't necessarily bad as long as the new revenues relieve the city of its longstanding commitment to also subsidize the effort to promote San Diego as a destination.

I suggested earlier that things like the museums and arts organizations that the city currently funds could and should now turn to the hoteliers in charge of the new TMD for funds. After all, if their operations do generate enthusiasm for the city as a destination -- as has been argued forever -- then funding them fits perfectly within the mission of the TMD.

Francis saw a different route to the same end. The city spends millions each year operating the convention center. Perhaps the convention center, another draw to the city, could be funded by the TMD.

If Francis makes it so we can at least talk about things, I'll be thrilled. As will others who might feel like they've been talking to the wall on these ideas.

-- SCOTT LEWIS




18 Comments so far on this story...

I didn't vote for Steve Francis in the last election. However, he is looking better this time around, although his urgent need to privatize city jobs smells fishy - too much behind-the-scene bartering going on. His plan to accept $1 for salary as mayor seems odd. Makes me question his TRUE purpose seeking the mayor's job.

Posted by Cheeky | reply to this comment
January 15, 2008 2:52 pm

That sound you hear is the bursting veins of the city's business establishment. Francis is going to be snubbed at the Chamber of Commerce board meetings like a fat, nerdy kid in the schoolyard. Although, I have a newfound respect for him for that very reason. It takes guts to thumb your nose at the "cool kids" like that. At least he'll be able to comfort himself by wallowing naked in a pile of cash. (What?? It works!!)

Posted by Pop! | reply to this comment
January 15, 2008 2:53 pm

Straight talk? What a breath of fresh air. Looks like our whimpy mayor may get his clock cleaned. If Ducheny enters the race, Col Sanders may not even make it past the primary.

Posted by Larry | reply to this comment
January 15, 2008 2:58 pm

Hey, Cheeky! Clearly he's not in it for the salary or even the potential big bucks from post-reign lobbying. The guy's worth more than $50 million! But there is a bit of lording his wealth over everyone else. I mean, it's nice to know you'll never need to be beholden to anyone because you're so rich you can spend your own money, but who else is in a position to do that? It's not it's throwing down the gauntlet in a way challengers can match, like promising not to run a negative campaign. It's not like his challengers can stand up and say, "Then I promise to self-fund too!" Francis should be careful about wielding his wealth too heavily; it could backfire on him.

Posted by Pop! | reply to this comment
January 15, 2008 3:20 pm

Pop!, there certainly is validity to your statement about the potential of backfiring. And I'm sure there a lot of people who resent and are jealous of his success. However, given the current state of the city's finances it might be time we voters look at a guy like this who obviously knows how to make and manage money, and elect him to try turn things around?

Posted by Dukestir Wilkes | reply to this comment
January 15, 2008 3:48 pm

Yes, it's certainly worth a try. I'm not knocking wealth or begrudging him his self-made millions, I'm just saying he should be careful to strike the right tone -- successful, not smug. You could see the no-salary move being used against him somehow -- like he's too big to be bothered with the silly spare change of the mayoral paycheck. That's a lot of money to some people! More on his side is how he's proved he's not worried about being popular with San Diego's Good Old Boys (and Girls). That might help him garner votes from people who wouldn't normally vote for a pro-business rightie. People are so sick of go-along, get-along politics, which is why Frye has enjoyed such popularity.

Posted by Pop! | reply to this comment
January 15, 2008 4:24 pm

I like both of these ideas! By the way, Mayor Sanders doesn't draw his mayor's salary; he lives on his city retirement.

Posted by Steve K | reply to this comment
January 15, 2008 4:24 pm

Steve K.: Actually, the mayor does draw a salary but he subtracts his pension out of it. So, in the end, his salary is something like $30K.

Posted by Scott Lewis | reply to this comment
January 15, 2008 4:52 pm

Hey, Pop! I know that Francis is not living paycheck-to-paycheck - duh! That doesn't answer my question - WHY DOES HE WANT TO BE MAYOR? And his snub of the Good Ole Boys and Girls is in response to their endorsing Sanders for mayor early on in the race. He would be a whole different animal if he had received the early endorsement. Still, I think he is Sanders' perfect nightmare...an attractive, smart, wealthy, business-savvy, self-funded opponent not beholden to campaign contributors...watch out Colonel Sanders!

Posted by Cheeky | reply to this comment
January 15, 2008 5:48 pm

Apparently Frances noticed that flip-flopping is what candidates do these days. He's off to a good start. He would endorse Frye if he had to do it over again? What positions did Frye hold then that Frances agrees with now? Tell us, exactly, Steve. Saying she's honest doesn't cut it. The fact is, Frances is trying to recast himself as a populist, but that's going to be impossible - he made his millions off the backs of his underpaid nurses, and has no demonstrable skills applicable to the job of major-city mayor. Ducheny won't run, and it's over before it started. Dream all you want, but it's over.

Posted by My goodness . . . | reply to this comment
January 15, 2008 8:43 pm

Francis' suggestions all seem worth discussing, but some perspective can't hurt either. He thinks these might save $15 million? The City is running $400 million short this year on contributions to the pension fund that had been promised in exchange for labor concessions. Sure, $15 million is $15 million, but until we get brass-tacks serious in talking taxes or cutting services we're not talking about doing anything about our debts.

Posted by Jeffrey Davis | reply to this comment
January 15, 2008 8:43 pm

Let me ask you a question (you being everybody)- wasn't there a self-funded politician that won by a slim margin, then turned out to be imbalanced? How do we know that won't happen again? Otherwise, Francis' ideas do sound intriguing. Sanders does not impress me- he looks like a Mayor, but does he do anything without the approval of Sainz?

Posted by PBnJ | reply to this comment
January 15, 2008 8:45 pm

My new motto is.................. ANYONE BUT KFC SANDERS

Posted by Billy Bob Henry | reply to this comment
January 16, 2008 8:39 am

Francis is worse than Sanders -- he's trying to have it both ways, and you can't do that -- it never works and is disingenuous! Francis is being a fair weather politician and trying to fool the populace into thinking he's ALL of their friends which is FAKE. I cannot believe there is a single San Diegan who would believe this man can govern from the left and right -- truly, the middle will get creamed.

Posted by Christopher Hall | reply to this comment
January 16, 2008 8:45 am

OK, so the negatives for Francis is that he's got a lot of money behind him (his own) and it isn't clear if he's being truthful. Well, the same can be said for Sanders (except that is other peoples money). Jerry, and his team, have effectively alienated every community group in this town. I'll vote for Francis. These two ideas make sense--unless your part of the the San Diego 300 elitists who believe that corporate welfare can be cloaked under the banner of free enterprise. Sanders/Sainz/Michel have had their chance. They failed just like Golding and Murphy. It is time to give someone else a try. And, for our city's sake I hope that Francis knows the true meaning of the word and policy implications of TRANSPARENCY.

Posted by Torrey Pines | reply to this comment
January 16, 2008 9:49 am

Regarding Transparency - look at the platform - offering to hold office hours, attend public comment session, publish calendar every week on the web, put the city's contracts and leases on the web. Simple stuff but Jerry's team had 2+ years to do things like that and punted cause they don't understand that San Diegans are SOOOO cynical about their government.

Posted by SD20 | reply to this comment
January 16, 2008 2:36 pm

I don't trust Francis. I know he lies. How exactly will he fix our finances? Does he have a plan, or just a vision? I guess I just have a visceral gut feeling against him.

Posted by Fran | reply to this comment
January 16, 2008 4:07 pm

Thank you SD20 for the info. We have been asking for Mayor Sanders to show up at City Council meeting or at least have a staff member on hand to refer citizens concerns. As Einstein said, 90 percent of life is just showing up. Mr. Francis campagin promises include: link Attend at least one hour of non-agenda public comment during the week, to personally meet and listen with concerned residents. He will also request that his Deputy Chief for Legislative Affairs attend every council meeting to ensure responsiveness from the Mayor’s Office on all matters before the City Council. Establish standing bi-monthly meetings with each City Councilmember. Reach out to the public and hold a town hall meeting at least once a month, rotating through every neighborhood in San Diego, and hold open office hours for residents to sit down with the Mayor.

Posted by La Playa Heritage | reply to this comment
January 23, 2008 11:10 pm


Reader feedback
  • Users may post more than one comment, but should not pose as multiple users. Multiple posts from the same IP address but with a different user name on each will be reviewed to determine whether abuse has occurred.
  • Posts with overly personal attacks or unsubstantiated allegations may be edited or deleted.
  • Please be patient with the posts -- there may be a delay before they appear on the site -- and make sure to enter the code in the "image verification" box.
Post a comment
Name:
Email:
Comments:
Current Word Count: Verification Code
a75f40c

Scott Lewis on Politics

The Scott Lewis on Politics blog, abbreviated cleverly as SLOP, is a collection of observations, insights and the occasional scoop on public affairs in San Diego. Please feel free to e-mail Scott at scott.lewis@voiceofsandiego.org.


Listen to voiceofsandiego.org's radio program on AM 600 KOGO: Latest Episode (November 8): Scott Lewis and Michael Zucchet talk about the city's budget

Subscribe to the Podcast Feed



MOST POPULAR STORIES:



MOST POPULAR STORIES:


Copyright © 2009 voiceofsandiego.org. All Rights Reserved.