voiceofsandiego.org: Slop... The New School Supe's Carrot
an independent nonprofit |
Support This Service

The New School Supe's Carrot

Published: Sunday, January 27, 2008 6:21 PM PST



For anyone who read this great story about the background and contract of the new superintendent of the San Diego Unified School District, I have a question. Is the so-called incentive package really stupid or is it just me?

Here's the nut (emphasis added):

Grier's contract, which allows him extra pay for meeting goals, breaks new ground for San Diego Unified. Cohn had no such provision in his contract, and a similar scheme for Bersin relied on broad goals. In contrast, Grier's bonuses will hinge on three specific, measurable yearly goals that have yet to be set. For each goal he meets, Grier will earn $3,500. If he fails, the board can fire him.

Nationwide, such incentives are increasingly common, with most superintendents offered far higher bonuses than Grier, said Ron Wilson, executive director of the North American Association of Educational Negotiators. Typically, a superintendent can expect to earn between $5,000 and $7,500 per goal, with the potential to boost their base salary between 10 and 20 percent. Grier can earn a maximum of $10,500 extra each year -- less than 4 percent of his $269,000 salary.

A quirk in the contract allows Grier to earn $10,500 even if the goals aren't met, provided that "the delay is not due to the superintendent's lack of concurrence with the goals." Wilson called the provision "a worst-case scenario," to prevent the superintendent from losing if board members "got into loggerheads" over already-set goals. If he simply disagrees with the goals, however, the superintendent loses.



I think providing the new chief some incentives to do a good job is a great idea. But he's going to make $269,000 a year. So the guy gets $3,500 each time he accomplishes one of three goals? And he already makes $269,000?

And then, even if they can't figure out what goals they want to achieve, he stills gets the payment?

Here's how that part of his contract actually reads:

In the event that the BOARD and the SUPERINTENDENT fail to establish the three goals as provided in the manner and time frame specified in D.1. of this Contract for any Contract year, and there is not mutual agreement to extend the period for the development of the goals, and the delay is not due to the SUPERINTENDENT's lack of concurrence with the goals, the SUPERINTENDENT shall automatically be entitled to Performance Pay of Ten Thousand Five Hundred ($10,500) at the end of such Contract year.


I don't doubt Grier is going to be motivated to achieve these goals -- whatever they end up being. He's the new Supe at a huge school district. He's got a chance to do great things and he sounds like the kind of guy who wants to do great things.

But if board members felt like additional incentives were needed, don't you think they could have been a bit more ambitious?

Truth is, what they ended up with was the lawyerly equivalent of trying to get a high school kid to do his homework with the promise of a colorful little sticker. If we're going to do incentives, let's go long. How about making $100K of his salary dependent on showing a steady increase in the number of kids who go to college?

Now that's an incentive.

-- SCOTT LEWIS




7 Comments so far on this story...

You know, we really don't want every kid to go to college. First, its not fair to expect every kid to be suitable for higher education. Second, we need people to do the jobs that do not require a college education or degree, and we should treat them with the respect due to hard working, productive citizens, rather than as people who failed by not going on to college. Vocational training served a real purpose, and should be brought back in force.

Posted by College? | reply to this comment
January 27, 2008 7:51 pm

'How about making $100K of his salary dependent on showing a steady increase in the number of kids who go to college?'......Becau this is government, that's why. And in gov everything is done backwards and Mickey Mouse so it does not work correctly. As for the $10K bonus, that is less than 4% of his base salary-why on earth would he, or anyone, even care about such a small ticket bonus?????

Posted by Billy Bob Henry | reply to this comment
January 27, 2008 9:48 pm

Great idea about the magnitude of the bonus. I think the same strategy should be applied to reporters who break big stories that really make a difference in San Diego. That can be just as important as getting more kids into college. Even $10,000 would be appreciated, I'm sure.

Posted by Jack | reply to this comment
January 27, 2008 10:59 pm

I just knew it couldn't be education writer Emily Alpert writing this cheeky hypothetical about the odd corporate practice of granting bonuses to public school superintendents. But Scott raises some good points and probably, following this line of thought, he should get a bonus that he would share with his co-editor Andrew Donohue. Personally, I think the supe's very generous salary -- which doesn't even describe his transportation, travel and health benefits --ought to be sufficient incentive to do his best as head educator in the school district. I believe in fair wages, standards for performance, reasonable oversight and personal motivation -- for everybody, even those teachers whom Billy Bob loves to hate.

Posted by Frances O'Neill Zimmerman | reply to this comment
January 28, 2008 1:37 pm

Will the pandering ever stop for Steve Francis?? Who is this guy?? He will say or do anything for support right now. Hard work was good for him but not for the black community? Does he really think handouts and empty promises will earn him credibility in the black community? Does he think they will sell themselves for so little? He is exploiting racial aspects by playing the old classic political card of race warfare of the haves and have nots. "He (Francis) spoke of more than just economic enterprise zones, he spoke of simple things like encouraging people to open bank accounts instead of going to check cashing places on Friday evening." We can only expect Francis to go back into the black community and promote the great jobs available to black people in the pharmaceutical testing industry after his defeat for a second time to make a buck.

Posted by Debt Collector | reply to this comment
January 28, 2008 1:49 pm

4. Frances O'Neill Zimmerman wrote on January 28, 2008 3:37 PM: I believe in fair wages, standards for performance, reasonable oversight and personal motivation -- for everybody, even those teachers whom Billy Bob loves to hate........ as a licensed teacher for over 20 years I will tell you I only love to hate the BAD teachers, and there is an extra ordinary number of them, like in all gov employment, and they should be fired. I have been there in the teaching trenches, and I know as much about teaching as anyone.

Posted by Billy Bob Henry | reply to this comment
January 28, 2008 7:11 pm

Well, since every word published here is God's truth, I am going to believe what Billy Bob Henry says about being a teacher for many years and say, thank you for your efforts -- if, in fact, you are not just licensed but actually do work as a teacher. Regardless, I have been dumfounded by your repeated insistence here that teachers are blood-sucking free-loading "government" employees, and by implication, that government employees are themselves leeches and the lowest of the low. Harsh, harsh, and inaccurate. I think teachers and civil servants make a huge contribution to our lives.

Posted by FO'NZ | reply to this comment
January 29, 2008 1:38 pm


Reader feedback
  • Users may post more than one comment, but should not pose as multiple users. Multiple posts from the same IP address but with a different user name on each will be reviewed to determine whether abuse has occurred.
  • Posts with overly personal attacks or unsubstantiated allegations may be edited or deleted.
  • Please be patient with the posts -- there may be a delay before they appear on the site -- and make sure to enter the code in the "image verification" box.
Post a comment
Name:
Email:
Comments:
Current Word Count: Verification Code
709b691

Scott Lewis on Politics

The Scott Lewis on Politics blog, abbreviated cleverly as SLOP, is a collection of observations, insights and the occasional scoop on public affairs in San Diego. Please feel free to e-mail Scott at scott.lewis@voiceofsandiego.org.


Listen to voiceofsandiego.org's radio program on AM 600 KOGO: Latest Episode (November 8): Scott Lewis and Michael Zucchet talk about the city's budget

Subscribe to the Podcast Feed



MOST POPULAR STORIES:



MOST POPULAR STORIES:


Copyright © 2009 voiceofsandiego.org. All Rights Reserved.