voiceofsandiego.org: Contributing Voices... Stop Subsidizing Economic Doom
an independent nonprofit |
March to 1,000 Members: 991 so far. Contribute today.

Stop Subsidizing Economic Doom

By Murtaza Baxamusa



Monday, March 10, 2008 | Now is the time to plan a San Diego beyond a recession.

San Diegans are having a tough time making ends meet. The cost of living in San Diego is increasing faster than wages. Today, a single adult needs at least $28,510 a year for basic essentials and a two-adult working family with two children needs $71,385 for basic expenses including childcare.

Murtaza Baxamusa

Falling employment, stagnant wages, uncontrolled debt and slack consumer confidence are afflicting San Diego as much, if not more than, the rest of the nation. San Diego has the lowest average wage per job, when adjusted for the cost of living, among comparable metro areas in the United States. San Diego wages also have the lowest purchasing power, given local costs. In this context, low-wage workers are most vulnerable since they often lack a cushion of savings.

As San Diego braces for recession-like economic conditions, we need to step back and reevaluate our failed economic development strategy from the past decade. Our vision for San Diego beyond the recession should be one of stable employment providing decent wages and healthcare coverage. To build a strong local economy, San Diegans need to be self-sufficient, adaptive, educated and trained, and they need institutional protections to maintain a decent standard of living.

The region’s biggest economic stimulus package lies in the earnings of all San Diegans. For their hard work, people expect to earn enough to at least cover food, housing, gas, childcare and medicine.

There are innumerable ways in which local governments can influence the livelihood of workers. Sandag found that, since 1990, the local economy has created eight times more low-wage jobs than high-paying jobs. This structural imbalance is not just the voodoo of some invisible hand, but a product of decades of land-use and public policy decisions that have bled the work force through neglect.

According to a recent voiceofsandiego.org article:

Marney Cox, chief economist for SANDAG, called the imbalance a "significant problem" and marveled that job-creation ratio doesn't stop the region from wooing new hotel and visitor-oriented development without seriously investing in the things that would draw better-paying jobs.


We need strong safeguards that protect our workers’ ability to earn the American Dream. The following are possible solutions to brace ourselves in a faltering economy.

1) Economic impacts of land-use decisions should be evaluated.
There are employment, business and tax impacts each time a development project is approved. Municipalities and the county draw templates for future employment by designating which land will be used for which purpose. Every land-use decision makes a statement about the kind of society we will become.

When lawmakers approve new developments, they're setting a precedent for the way the economy will be structured. Instead of passively accepting the plans of developers for new hotels and tourist attractions, the region's leaders should consider how the land could be used to foster better jobs.

Every responsible business measures the impacts of its decisions on its bottom line; why shouldn’t the city of San Diego?

2) Public investments should target better quality jobs for local residents.
One of the most significant drivers of the local economy is government spending, be it building roads and energy infrastructure, firefighting, or teaching at public schools. To be strategic in lifting the local workforce, public spending has to be in tune with long-term sustainability and economic development. When local residents are employed on projects funded by local taxpayers, the money circulates and multiplies within the community. Taxpayer dollars should keep good jobs local.

3) Government should stop subsidizing businesses that pay poorly.
Taxpayer dollars should not be spent on projects without a thorough analysis of the return on investment. There are hidden costs to any project.

Our lowest-paying industry is leisure and hospitality, which employs more than 150,000 people in San Diego County and pays an average annual wage of only $21,632, including tips and gratuities. More than half the workers in this industry are either completely uninsured or rely on government health insurance programs.

Subsidies or “economic development incentives” are, simply put, taxpayer giveaways to businesses that are unable to survive in the free market. We pamper those businesses, hide their subsidies within obscure legislation, and sometimes forget they have grown up and don’t need our support. For example, it's not publicly known which businesses get enterprise zone subsidies (your $$) in San Diego.

4) Public policy should encourage sustainable business development.
Our energy independence will to a great extent determine our future quality of life. Clean energy technology will ensure that San Diego remains a picture-perfect postcard setting that has attracted the best talent in the country.

Green-collar jobs are the prevailing mantra to solve both our energy needs and our livelihood. Moreover, investment in small business incubators to match local talents will encourage local entrepreneurship and public-private partnerships.

The city of San Diego is expected to approve an Economic Prosperity Element of its General Plan today.

Later this month, the Sandag board of directors will approve the Regional Economic Prosperity Strategy. Weak recommendations that focus on business needs and ignore residents do not bring prosperity to all. If the region is to prosper, the challenges faced by our workforce must be addressed.

If we want economic prosperity for working San Diegans, we must ring the bell, not bury it.

Murtaza Baxamusa is the director of policy and research for the Center on Policy Initiatives and is on the Advisory Committee of Sandag's Regional Economic Prosperity Strategy, and a Board member of the San Diego City-County Reinvestment Task-force.




11 Comments so far on this story...

I probably agree more than disagree with you, but it's a little hinky to raise a bunch of questions (that the CPI has devoted itself to answering, no less), without giving any specifics about what you think the problem is. For instance, if someone wants to put up a hotel on a vacant lot, why *shouldn't* we stop them?

Posted by 3fingerspointback | reply to this comment
March 10, 2008 1:55 am

Damn it, Mr B. There you go again practicing science when our voodoo economic gurus have us believing that all our problems are other's fault. Its no wonder that CPI's reports are coveted in financial circles and cover the bottoms of birdcages around here.Radical problems deserve radical root solutions.In January 08 we began to hear proposals of public-private partnership initiatives that offer us an alternative to the SD anarchy.Performance based infrastructure/housi bonds were approved by the voters in 06 but are yet engaged. The question remains on whether the concept will ever be embraced by developers or is even fundable now. An alternative was recently unveiled in City District One when Pardee Homes partnered with the SDFD and the City in getting Fire Station 47 built. Profitable Cooperation in public service. What a concept! Hopefully, this modality can be applied elsewhere in America's Failing City. It's almost revolutionary.

Posted by Hands across the aisle | reply to this comment
March 10, 2008 4:51 am

This part of your analysis is very important: "Subsidies or “economic development incentives” are, simply put, taxpayer giveaways to businesses that are unable to survive in the free market. We pamper those businesses, hide their subsidies within obscure legislation, and sometimes forget they have grown up and don’t need our support. For example, it's not publicly known which businesses get enterprise zone subsidies (your $$) in San Diego." The Enterprise Zone subsidy program in Golden Hill, for example, is tapped by wealthy owners of multiple bars. If these owners can afford to own and operate clubs all over town, they don't need the substantial tax break afforded by EZ subsidies. These owners survive quite well in the free market. The EZ program expansion and renewal this year is going to further enrich wealthy developers and will continue to drain the tax base. EZ subsidies are public records.

Posted by EZ Subsidization | reply to this comment
March 10, 2008 6:49 am

This is an excellent economic philosophy guaranteed to lead to a robust economy that encourages investment and upword mobility. Keep up the good work Performance Institute. The labor unions ...rrrr... working class....need you more than ever. - Respectfully, Joseph Stalin.

Posted by Stalin | reply to this comment
March 10, 2008 8:53 am

These are all great ideas if we can agree that there are no mandated project labor agreements. Let the market truly be free and have laborers compete. Guaranteeing these jobs to a cretain class of laborer simply because they pay union dues should be illegal...wait I think it is. Weird it hasn't stopped the Labor Council or building trades from extortion..

Posted by Union Extortionist | reply to this comment
March 10, 2008 9:09 am

You just don't get it, do you? this city is run by and for the benefit of three groups: the tourism industry, the property developers and the sports team owners. Most of the local politicians are totally beholden to one or more of them. Nothing will change until we get some more independent and smarter people running for office.

Posted by Billy B | reply to this comment
March 10, 2008 12:00 pm

I downloaded your 2008 cost of living study and will be usig it in a case I have. Good stuff. Learned of it thru Don Bauder's column, and he gave me your web site. Have you ever been used as an expert witness before regarding these cost of living issues????

Posted by Billy Bob Henry | reply to this comment
March 10, 2008 3:38 pm

A very thoughtful overview of a multi-progronged set of problems and ideas for solutions. Thanks for putting this out there.

Posted by Rich Dittbenner | reply to this comment
March 15, 2008 7:37 am

Mr. Murtasa, I don't know where you get your "facts' or info from to base your conclusions. Frankly, you are flat out wrong on many of your points. We don't have high paying jobs in the state of CA anymore because business and industry can't afford the high cost of doing business here. Labor unions have killed the goose that lays the golden eggs. What is left if the tourist industry. Government can't force business and industry to come here if the laws of economics don't pencil out no matter how you try to manipulate it. Also Enterprise Zones are governed by laws. If you feel they have been violated, litigate it. And last, SD in particular gives away precious little in economic incentives. Most state incentives expired years ago. Those incentives were responsible for job creations in the hundred of thousands. That is fact.

Posted by EcoDevExpert | reply to this comment
March 15, 2008 6:09 pm

San Diego was blessed by the powers above with certain characteristics. 1. Everyone believes that this is PARADISE. Those who can afford to move here, will. 2. Housing prices are still dropping. There is ample high-end housing stock available for every monied taste. 3. The U.S. dollar isn't what it used to be. Foreign currencies are where the value is, and will continue to be. Add 1 plus 2 plus 3 and you get throngs of wealthy foreigners who have a taste for our little RIVIERA on the Pacific, buying into the local housing market. Saudis, Kuwaitis, Chinese, Japanese, have to do something with all of their new found wealth, denominated in strong foreign currencies. So invest in America: buy a mansion or two in San Diego. As a bonus, there is a huge pool of cheap servile legal labor on both sides of the border.

Posted by Gregory Duch | reply to this comment
March 27, 2008 7:14 pm

San Diego was blessed by the powers above with certain characteristics. 1. Everyone believes that this is PARADISE. Those who can afford to move here, will. 2. Housing prices are still dropping. There is ample high-end housing stock available for every monied taste. 3. The U.S. dollar isn't what it used to be. Foreign currencies are where the value is, and will continue to be. Add 1 plus 2 plus 3 and you get throngs of wealthy foreigners who have a taste for our little RIVIERA on the Pacific, buying into the local housing market. Saudis, Kuwaitis, Chinese, Japanese, have to do something with all of their new found wealth, denominated in strong foreign currencies. So invest in America: buy a mansion or two in San Diego. As a bonus, there is a huge pool of cheap servile legal labor on both sides of the border.

Posted by Gregory Duch | reply to this comment
March 27, 2008 7:14 pm


Reader feedback
  • Users may post more than one comment, but should not pose as multiple users. Multiple posts from the same IP address but with a different user name on each will be reviewed to determine whether abuse has occurred.
  • Posts with overly personal attacks or unsubstantiated allegations may be edited or deleted.
  • Please be patient with the posts -- there may be a delay before they appear on the site -- and make sure to enter the code in the "image verification" box.
Post a comment
Name:
Email:
Comments:
Current Word Count: Verification Code
2b69638



MOST POPULAR STORIES:


Copyright © 2009 voiceofsandiego.org. All Rights Reserved.