voiceofsandiego.org: Slop... Moonlighting Permitted If...
an independent nonprofit |
Support This Service

Moonlighting Permitted If...

Published: Monday, April 14, 2008 3:36 PM PDT



There was a lingering question Friday about whether Marti Emerald could legally take a second (or third) job if she becomes a member of the San Diego City Council.

She has said she will suffer financially with the $75,000 salary council members earn and she may keep doing consulting work or teach at a college to make up for it.

It looks like she would be in charge of deciding whether that's OK or not.

The city charter says this (emphasis mine):

Council members, including the Mayor, shall devote full time to the duties of their office and not engage in any outside employment, trade, business or profession which interferes or conflicts with those duties.


How in the world would you ever be able to prove that an outside job interfered or conflicted with an official's duties? You'd have to ask them. I bet I can predict how they would answer if asked whether they were letting their private enterprise efforts interfere with their official duties.

Reader Jennifer asked me to go a bit further with this in feedback on the last post.

Here was Jennifer's question:

The attack on Marti Emerald is very transparent and may actually bring up more questions about her opponent's outside work. Will Ms [April] Boling continue her current accounting career outside of council work if elected? And, will she actually be making more money...or less.... than she does now, if elected? I await answers, Scott. Thanks


OK, answers. I asked April Boling if the council salary would be less than her current earnings. She said "definitely."

I asked if she'd keep active in her accounting business. She said the council salary is enough.

"I believe it is impossible for a councilmember to represent his or her district well with a side job," she said. "Once elected, I will shut down my accounting practice and take no new clients or employment during my term in office."

Hope that helps.

-- SCOTT LEWIS




4 Comments so far on this story...

This is what iks me with all the griping about elected officials' salaries. A salary boost is like what, a 100th of one percent of the annual budget? Meanwhile, a REGULAR person, say a teacher or whatever, can't afford to take one of these positions, even assuming they could raise the money to get elected in the first place. So we end up either with wealthy (typically self employed) folks or those otherwise unemployable. What this city needs are folks to run for office with succesful careers with large corporations, which is exactly what the city is.

Posted by JohnnyDee | reply to this comment
April 14, 2008 3:07 pm

Scott, thanks for asking the question. And I now have more questions: Now that the Council has voted to increase the pay of members 24%, will that be enough for Ms. Boling and Ms. Emerald? How do they feel about the pay increase versus the cuts the City is making elsewhere in the budget? How would they vote on the pay increase issue? Should Council members vote their own pay increases? How many of the current Council members "moonlight" in their outside businesses? If so, has their outside work affected their performance? Again awaiting answers. Thanks in advance for your research.

Posted by Jennifer | reply to this comment
April 15, 2008 6:53 am

No NEW clients or business? Or no clients or business?

Posted by JF | reply to this comment
April 15, 2008 3:40 pm

Johnny Dee, you make a great point. Raising Counsel salaries is not something anyone thinks sounds good, but all you'll attract is super wealthy or destitute idiots. And for those in the middle who do get elected, trying to support their families on $75k a year, may be tempted to boost their income or line up a plumb private job once out of office, thereby creating conflicts. Department heads in the City all make over $100K, as do many deputy directors, deputy city attorneys, etc. Let's face it, it's interesting when your "boss" makes half of what you do. Still, I think if the City were not such a mess, there would be sufficient support for a pay raise.

Posted by Rock On | reply to this comment
April 18, 2008 12:51 pm


Reader feedback
  • Users may post more than one comment, but should not pose as multiple users. Multiple posts from the same IP address but with a different user name on each will be reviewed to determine whether abuse has occurred.
  • Posts with overly personal attacks or unsubstantiated allegations may be edited or deleted.
  • Please be patient with the posts -- there may be a delay before they appear on the site -- and make sure to enter the code in the "image verification" box.
Post a comment
Name:
Email:
Comments:
Current Word Count: Verification Code
a95da71

Scott Lewis on Politics

The Scott Lewis on Politics blog, abbreviated cleverly as SLOP, is a collection of observations, insights and the occasional scoop on public affairs in San Diego. Please feel free to e-mail Scott at scott.lewis@voiceofsandiego.org.


Listen to voiceofsandiego.org's radio program on AM 600 KOGO: Latest Episode (November 8): Scott Lewis and Michael Zucchet talk about the city's budget

Subscribe to the Podcast Feed



MOST POPULAR STORIES:



MOST POPULAR STORIES:


Copyright © 2009 voiceofsandiego.org. All Rights Reserved.