Commentary

Pitch In for Recycling



Wednesday, July 18, 2007 | On the floor of voiceofsandiego.org's small office sit three teeming grocery bags filled with recyclables. To recycle, the employees of this office -- and scores of other office buildings, condos and apartments around San Diego -- need to find some way to do it themselves. When these bags are filled, we take them down to the trunks of our cars and haul the bags to the neighborhood recreation center to be recycled.

It's a nice little initiative on our part. But how many other offices around the city are doing the same? We hope a lot, but we shouldn't be left to simply hoping.

Right now, office buildings, restaurants and multi-family housing aren't required to provide recycling to their tenants. And many, seeing the added cost and hassle, don't.

But there's talk at City Hall right now about instituting a mandatory recycling ordinance. It's about time. Nearly every other municipality in the region did something like this in the early 1990s. Elsewhere, some of the most forward-thinking have already moved past recycling and are pushing zero waste policies.

Here, we're sadly behind the times. An ordinance was supposedly being prepared to debut last fall, but it never saw the light of day. Mayor Jerry Sanders said he wouldn't support it. In that vacuum, City Attorney Mike Aguirre proposed a mandatory recycling ordinance that was a good start -- though too short on details to fully understand.

Now, just last week, Sanders promised to bring forth a recycling ordinance after conferring with all "affected stakeholders." But his office still hasn't completed a requested analysis of the costs and benefits of the mandatory recycling effort. His staff has also mysteriously shelved a council-approved plan to build a construction debris recycling center without much explanation why. (Concrete and lumber account for 35 percent of the waste entering Miramar Landfill.)

So, color us skeptical right now of what, if anything, might come from the Mayor's Office.

Sure, you might say, the city has some pretty serious issues to be dealing with right now. But this should be counted as one of them because of its important environmental and financial repercussions, especially considering that it should've been done about a decade and a half ago.

The people need a comprehensive proposal as soon as possible that they can debate and analyze. The city's only landfill, Miramar, will be full by 2015 under best-case scenarios, and city officials estimate that right now, two-thirds of all the waste entering Miramar could be recycled. If Miramar closes, the region would face the prospect of more costly dumping.

There's been a few complaints about a mandatory recycling ordinance from the business camps, such as the owners of offices and apartment complexes. Mainly, they say they want to be involved in the process to make sure all owners are accommodated. And they say they're worried about fines and want any ordinance to be accompanied by an education effort.

An education campaign would surely be a worthwhile endeavor. Their other concerns can be dealt with rather easily and they should be considered, alongside those of every other "stakeholder," in the mayor's talks.

But in the end there's one thing that is tough to deny: The time has come for recycling reform in San Diego.

It's important for governments to evolve over time. Businesses react quickly or they go out of business. Government entities will not necessarily go out of business, but they can certainly mess up their priorities. As we've advocated in the past, the city also needs to reevaluate the policy of free trash for single-family homes in light of the changing economics and environmental concerns.

The simple point: San Diegans who want to recycle in their apartments, offices and condos should be able to easily. And it's up to city officials to get this process moving with a long-overdue proposal and analysis encouraging a new model for recycling.

voiceofsandiego.org




Reader Feedback


Comments are now displayed with the newest at the bottom. Not sure you're seeing all of the comments? Click here:

Comments so far on this story:



1. Simple Guy wrote on July 17, 2007 3:02 PM:
"Bravo! I can't believe what a hassle it is to recycle my bottles, cans and newspapers in my (newly built BTW) apartment building. If I want to throw stuff away (and finish filling up the Miramar landfill even quicker), it's a free and easy 50 steps outside my door to the trash chute. To recycle, I have to go down the elevator to the garage, walk to the furthest part and then climb a flight of stairs, open three different doors all while carrying my recyclables, enter the stinky trash room and toss it into the Recycle dumpster. Total pain in the a**. And this City still lets me throw away as much trash as I want without paying a dime for it. Talk about a screwed-up incentive structure! Can this City PLEEZE make it a little easier to be Green???"

2. Howiek wrote on July 17, 2007 4:45 PM:
"Like a lot of things, San Diego is way behind the times; the time to start a recycling program is long past. Most of the rest of the county as well as the state have been recycling for years, get on the stick San Diego. And when Miramar closes don’t think you will simply be able to dump your trash anywhere, it’s going to cost a lot to ship it out of the county."

3. Rocky wrote on July 17, 2007 11:26 PM:
"The problem is, we are in a "Throw-Away Society." Most everything we buy has a short life cycle and thus, instead of repairing it means replacing. This is what is filling up the landfills. No matter how well a recycle program is implemented the trash will still overwhelm us in time. The manufacturers must get into the act and make items more durable and stop over-packaging the items they sell us."

4. Larry wrote on July 17, 2007 11:44 PM:
"Once again, the mayor and his "staff" prove that they are unable to execute. Their response to Frye's request for participation at her committee meeting was laughable. Are they not held to the charter anymore? As for recycling, this city should have had a plan nearly a year ago and should be well into the implementation by now. Deny, deceive, delay. That is the Sanders motto. It's time for change, starting with a new mayor in 2008."

5. Point Loman wrote on July 18, 2007 2:22 AM:
"So who is paying for the collection of the increased amount of recyclables? Pig farmers? If this ordinance is instituted, someone better amend the motion to include a repeal of "The Peoples' Ordinance." There is no way to increase service levels without increasing budgets. It just isn't possible."

6. Jason wrote on July 18, 2007 3:19 AM:
"I think SD should be analyzing other cities recycling programs for cost and effectiveness. I remember when Bloomberg became mayor, he stopped NYC's recycling program for a year. That was blasphemy, we'd been doing it for over a decade. Then, after his staff had time to review the program, they found a way to do it profitably. San Diego needs to get on the ball with this. Sander's administration is so reactive, coming up with new bull$#!^ is like a full time job for them. SD is an awesome city and it deserves better. We need a new mayor. link"

7. Mert wrote on July 18, 2007 3:42 AM:
"There isn't a snowball's chance in hell that our tax-averse citizens will repeal "The People's Ordinance", which allows residents to have their trash picked up for free. Given the city's financial woes, do you really think that our government will spend millions of dollars for a mandatory recycling ordinance? While it is something that should happen from an environmental standpoint, it just ain't gonna happen...."

8. Caitlin wrote on July 18, 2007 9:44 AM:
"Mert is dead on with regard to the voters unwillingness to repeal the "People's Ordinance" which is more than 100 years old. If Aguirre had any real courage, he would challenge the interpretation of the charter on this issue. The city simply needs to get out of the trash business altogether."

9. Bob wrote on July 21, 2007 1:07 AM:
"I love recycling in my large blue bin. It's full darn near every two weeks. But I will admit, I recycle my own bottles and cans for cash. A lot of my neighbors do not, so I can only assume that the city has some place where the content of all these blue bins are taken, sorted and sold for cash. I never see any figures on this. But I do see stories about how the city cannot get out of the trash business because of all the revenue it creates from dump fees. I just hope that the contents of the blue bins are not being taken to the Miramar landfill."


Feedback Rules


  • Users may post more than one comment, but should not pose as multiple users. Multiple posts from the same IP address but with a different user name on each will be reviewed to determine whether abuse has occurred.
  • Posts with overly personal attacks or unsubstantiated allegations may be edited or deleted.
  • Please be patient with the posts -- there may be a delay before they appear on the site -- and make sure to enter the code in the "image verification" box.

  • Add Your Comments

    Current Word Count:
    c4e776a
       

    A Charter School Rebuttal:

     

    Urban Discovery Academy responds to its critics.

    Friday, May 16, 2008 -- 4:24 pm

    Mayor Must Revisit Bargaining Table:

     

    He’s 'done negotiating,' but he’ll have to meet and confer with unions to get pension on the ballot.

    Friday, May 16, 2008 -- 5:11 pm

    'Inviting Further Litigation':

     

    More on the Bajagua scuttling.

    Friday, May 16, 2008 -- 10:30 am

    Sponsored By

    SURVIVAL IN SAN DIEGO

    Foreclosure Flood Continues:

     

    Filings up 103 percent over the year.

    Wednesday, May 14, 2008 -- 11:33 am

    LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

    Seals vs. People? Why?:

     

    Why are we allowing unreasonable people to demand that we spend money to disturb the seal colony that so many people enjoy visiting?

    Thursday, May 15, 2008 -- 1:58 pm

    CAFÉ SAN DIEGO

    'Fresh Face, Strong Voice and a Clear Eye':

     

    Marti Emerald can bring all of these assets to City Hall.

    Thursday, May 15, 2008 -- 7:50 pm

    COMMENTARY: SLOP

    Atkins' Goes for Housing Post:

     

    So much for it 'never crossing' her mind.

    Friday, May 16, 2008 -- 5:19 pm

    COMMENTARY: RICH TOSCANO

    Employment Goes Positive:

     

    After the first year-over-year decline since 1993, San Diego job growth is back in positive territory.

    Friday, May 16, 2008 -- 4:34 pm

    MOST POPULAR STORIES:

    Sponsored by


    Home About Us Contact Us Copyright Privacy Policy Site Sponsorship
    Copyright © 2008 voiceofsandiego.org. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Statement