Commentary

The Tried and True, the Hip and New and the Fighter in You



Thursday, March 20, 2008 | Not long ago, I wrote a series of posts in the blog about what I thought the top 10 local political and policy stories would be in 2008. A lot of people were excited about it and shared their own thoughts about the biggest stories to come.

But I think I missed one. I highlighted the city attorney's race as the community decision that will probably be the biggest story, if not the most vituperative and divisive contest this city has seen in recent memory. I still think that holds true. And I highlighted the City Council race to replace termed out Councilman Jim Madaffer in the 7th District. Two well-funded, articulate and impressive candidates are going to really battle it out there in coming months.

Again, I think I was right about that.

But I totally ignored District 3. The contest to replace City Councilwoman Toni Atkins is going to be healthy and fantastic politics watch.

It was a mistake to leave it out of the most interesting political stories to watch for in 2008.

What got my attention? It's pretty simple. I saw that the city's firefighters decided to endorse a candidate: Todd Gloria. I saw that the police couldn't quite decide and ended up endorsing two candidates: Gloria and John Hartley. And then I saw the San Diego-Imperial Counties Labor Council give an endorsement to three candidates: Gloria, Hartley and Stephen Whitburn. What does it mean to endorse when you endorse all three major candidates in the race?

Then the San Diego County Democratic Party decided to go for Whitburn. The Sierra Club went for Hartley and Whitburn. But the league of conservations voters went for Gloria.

Gloria is a legislative aide for U.S. Rep. Susan Davis, a former member of the Housing Commission and perhaps the most ambitious early campaigner. Whitburn was a strong leader of the San Diego Democratic Club, the gay and lesbian-focused political advocacy group with a lot of pull in the area. Hartley won the City Council seat in 1989 and now he wants to regain past glory. The guy is well-known in the area and is walking relentlessly, house to house, to earn a chance to get back to City Hall.

District 3 is a left-leaning district. But the more left-leaning organizations hoping to influence it don't seem to know what they want.

Actually, maybe they do know what they want. They just know that they'll get it regardless of who wins.

I decided I'd take a moment to find out what might decide the contest -- what would distinguish each of the candidates, define them, and then what that definition might mean for their chances. Yes, some groups like the AFL-CIO might think they would be fine with all three and rejoice at the chance to sit one of these races out. But I'm a columnist. What kind of columnist would I be if I didn't try to create a little division and exploit potential conflicts?

I'm not ready to find out.

I asked the three candidates what they thought the deciding factors would be in the coming months. Their answers and the way they answered might provide a bit of a guide for how things will go.

I was able to catch Hartley between his peripatetic rounds of the neighborhood. When I asked if I could call him back, he said he didn't have much time as he had to get back out and walk door to door. I'm telling you, he's walking around a lot.

He mentioned that he had "direct experience" exactly six times during our conversation. Direct experience solving problems. Direct experience finding resources and direct experience organizing the community. Those kinds of statements don't usually do much for me.

But he clearly has two passions in the race -- two things he can thinks he can make better: the infrastructure in the community and the policing of it.

"We have a city with misguided priorities. It pours millions into downtown development and turns around and tells the neighborhoods: 'We don't have money to pay for your needs,'" Hartley said. "They have to bring officers in for overtime just to meet fundamental standards for policing. Their equipment is deteriorating."

He said the city needs to free up millions to hire new police officers and fix the streets. How would he pay for it? He's the only one of the three candidates who said he would direct money away from a "readily apparent" source: The city's Redevelopment Agency. Councilwoman Frye and others have long argued not only that the Redevelopment Agency (which is the City Council) owes the city millions, but also that it could absorb some of the payments the city's general fund makes to pay off things like the downtown ballpark. If it did that, the city would have money available for other needs.

Hartley has to walk a lot because he's battling to make sure this isn't a race just between Gloria and Whitburn, whose campaign machines are growing strong -- reflected in everything from the quality of their websites to the professional look of their signs. Hartley is hoping for a swell of support to come from recognition of his name and from his daily walks.

We'll see -- he does have "direct experience" doing it in the past.

Gloria has no experience running a campaign. He's a relatively young guy. Not long ago he invited me to become his "friend" on Facebook. (Just to be clear: I will be Facebook friends with any registered candidate for office -- good way to keep track of your Scrabble skills -- Gloria's just the only one so far to ask.)

What did Gloria say would be the deciding factor in the race? Voters making a choice about who is most effective. Most effective at completing the 29th Street Promenade. Most effective at getting the city and school district to allow Hillcrest residents to use the grass at Florence Elementary as parkland when school's not in session. Most effective at stabilizing the eroding slopes in Kensington.

"The community is longing to see someone who is a champion for their causes. They want someone who's going to continue with all these projects. They are passionate about them and they are not going to have a lot of patience for a transition," Gloria said.

He left the door open for tax increases to pay for the increase in policing and funding for infrastructure that he claims the area needs. He says we need to have an "adult conversation" about all the options to increase revenue. But we definitely need to increase revenue.

"We have to be upfront about what it's going to take to pay for things like shorter emergency response times and brush abatement," he said.

Beating Stephen Whitburn is what it's going to take for Gloria to get to City Hall. Whitburn and his supporters (who include City Councilwoman Donna Frye) are fired up. Asked what he thought would decide the race, Whitburn said it was clear: Voters would decide what to do based on who they thought "was going to stand up for the neighborhoods as opposed to the entrenched interests at City Hall."

"A lot of people in District 3 have found our neighborhoods consistently on the defensive against the big developers and I think that people believe the neighborhoods ought to come first," Whitburn said.

He made clear that the bellicose rhetoric against big developers and shady backroom schemers at City Hall was the "central position" of his campaign. He said it saddened him that despite neighborhood opposition, they couldn't stop projects like 301 University, a 12-story housing complex many fret will change Hillcrest's character. Large housing projects should be put farther east on El Cajon Blvd., Whitburn said.

"You have the traffic capacity and infrastructure there and a surrounding neighborhood which is multifamily and embraces multifamily developments," Whitburn said.

Without first introducing "good and honest government" to San Diego City Hall, Whitburn said you can't talk much about how the city might prioritize its budget or raise new funds. Asked where new revenues might come if you did get that nice, user-friendly government, Whitburn went after his favorite target: developers. They can pay more in fees, he said.

It'll be a classic San Diego political contest. Watch it closely. These differences in style between mostly progressive candidates for a left-leaning City Council seat can alter the future of the city just as much as the traditional differences between liberals and conservatives.

Please contact Scott Lewis (scott.lewis@voiceofsandiego.org) directly with your thoughts, ideas, personal stories or tips. Or send a letter to the editor.




Reader Feedback


Comments are now displayed with the newest at the bottom. Not sure you're seeing all of the comments? Click here:

Comments so far on this story:



1. Neighborhoods wrote on March 20, 2008 7:46 AM:
"The obvious first place to look to see what a candidate might consider important, once in office, is their donor list. Gloria is supported by all of the big developers and their friends and benficiaries. Whitburn is not. Why is that? Do the developers know both guys and just like Gloria better? I think not. Developers and investors look for a return on their investments. Gloria will help them make more money. Whitburn will benefit and empower the single-residence property owners, renters, and single-business owners in the many neighborhoods of District 3. Malin Burnham and Sandy Shapery and Isabel Dutra can well afford to pay their share. And I'll pay mine. But we'll have Whitburn to try to make sure that the shares are fairly apportioned."

2. Christopher Hall wrote on March 20, 2008 8:31 AM:
"It is prideful that Gloria would say this: 'The community is longing to see someone who is a champion for their causes. They want someone who's going to continue with all these projects. They are passionate about them and they are not going to have a lot of patience for a transition.' // Whitburn and Hartley also want to be a champion for the causes of the public. Also, it is shocking and negligent to say the public isn't going to have a lot of patience for a transition, WHEN INDEED a transition is what they all want! Gloria is saying he'll continue along the same track as the current city council and that is down right mad. // Hmmm...Maybe Gloria thinks the American public has no patience for a transition from Bush-Cheney too..."

3. uptowndem wrote on March 20, 2008 8:41 AM:
"Scott Lewis column would be better if it told us each candidate's source of campaign funds. I see Comment #1 filled us in on where Todd Gloria gets his-developers. So we know here his vote will be if he gets elected."

4. Henry the 4th wrote on March 20, 2008 10:02 AM:
"Whilst dissecting the political culture of this town I'd like to see some discussion of the REAL San Diego, which motivates much of the yucky stuff we see in City Hall. I'm a long time resident yet I'm sad to say that underneath the pretty facade there lurks a narcissistic beast. The awful beating of the young australian tourist at Ocean Beach encapsulates for me the reality of this place, paradise long gone to seed, and populated with thuggish politicians, developers, desperate seekers coping with sticker shock and low sunshine wages. Word on the street is you get an automatic 30% raise if you move to LA or Riverside, where the costs of living are the same or slightly less. But of course you're not in bloody paradise anymore, huh? As for politics, this paradise-survival crowd is really good at one thing: covering each others' backs. Witness the rage atMike."

5. Robert E. Lee wrote on March 20, 2008 10:27 AM:
"Sorry folks, but sometimes I just have to sit back and chuckle at all of this! Oh, well, some things just never change, do they? Sad, really..."

6. Neighborhoods wrote on March 20, 2008 11:35 AM:
"Not sure what Lee finds funny. Or sad. Maybe he'll explain? It is not too funny from out here in the neighborhood. But uptowndem, for a donor list, see link and choose candidate and year and dates. You can see all donors."

7. Neighborhoods wrote on March 20, 2008 11:41 AM:
"A quick glance at Gloria's developer and development corporation donors is totally revealing: There's Mitch Berner, Sunroad lobbyist and hired champion of the Golden Hill Development Corporation, and there's a boardmember of the Golden Hill Development Corporation, Sophie Akins, and there's the mom and dad of the young, malleable, inexperienced, naive, newly hired director of the Golden Hill Development Coporation, Margaret and Russ Downing, and there's James Brown, who just built an ugly monster in South Park, labeled "infill" by the North Park News...come one, come all...Golden Hill and South Park are where money can be made. And if the neighborhood doesn't like it, too bad. We're the big, connected developers, we will decide how we will improve the quality of your life. We own Gloria. Todd, you can disavow them...will you? You admitted you would have voted yes on Kensington Terrace. Any more admissions?"

8. www.robert-lee.org wrote on March 20, 2008 1:04 PM:
"Neighborhoods: Actually, I agree with you 100%. I am one of the other candidates running in District 3, and the (not so) funny aspect I refer to is that things are turning out, yet again, to be the same old business/politics as usual! Some of us would love to clean out the stink from City Hall, but it's one hell of a battle to try to effect change, as a candidate, when special interests commandeer yet another election cycle. You're right, it's not very funny at all, in actuality. Even the writer of this opinion piece does not mention the other candidates running in the D3 race. That's the system for ya..."

9. Larry wrote on March 20, 2008 2:04 PM:
""Even the writer of this opinion piece does not mention the other candidates running in the D3 race. That's the system for ya..." -- He mentioned everyone who has a chance of being elected. I guess he could have titled it "The Tried and True, the Hip and New, the Fighter in You, and who?"

10. Resident wrote on March 20, 2008 3:52 PM:
"Todd is my choice. He is a diligent advocate for the district and has the energy and enthusiasm to represent all residents. Saying he is part if the developer establishment is preposterous...he has always struck me as a fair and just person. If you look at his quotes, he shows that he can be a leader and do what is important for the citizen's that he will represent. He has already shown leadership in his role with U.S. Rep Davis. With his current and past experience, he will be a great councilmember."

11. Christopher Hall wrote on March 20, 2008 4:05 PM:
"Despite the fact that I would not vote for Mr. Lee, he has a valid point I would fight for. It is not like there are so many candidates in San Diego that honest, equal coverage can't be disseminated. And, it is the coverage that creates the fiction/ perception of front runner. For instance, what makes Gloria stand out? Certainly not his ideas or platform, nor is it his capacity for leadership. What makes him stand out are his glossy shoes and that smile that says 'I'll glad hand you today for a favor tomorrow.' Gloria is unexperienced, but as an aide he's learned who to schmooze to be greased into position for a run for office. Then, the media picks out these supplicants as worthy, and after a short run in the press, such candidates are made out to be the mainstream choice."

12. www.robert-lee.org wrote on March 20, 2008 4:19 PM:
"I'll take it then, Larry, that you're content with more of the establishment, status quo? The kind of "business as usual" pols that leave us with billion-dollar deficits all over the place? With the kind of deficits we're running, for example, we should at least have something to show for it, like immaculate, world-class roads; state-of-the-art infrastructure and technology; fire stations, with equipment and staffing that exceed national accreditation standards; overflow police academies bursting at the seams with new recruits, or better yet, no need to even operate a police academy, because veteran, experienced officers from other jurisdictions and departments are just beating down the doors at San Diego Police HQ to get in; pristine beaches that are never, ever closed by sewage spills; and on and on! Sorry, Larry, but we don't even come remotely close to any of that..."

13. Neighborhoods wrote on March 20, 2008 5:41 PM:
"Resident, I respect your preference, but support in the form of "If you look at his quotes,..." isn't very convincing. Quotes aren't going to float my boat; Gloria is full of quotes. I advise you to look at his VOTES, or how he claims he would have voted, and look at his donors, a clear indication of how he will vote. And if you ever called Davis' office and asked for an explicit anwser, say, as to why SHE voted yes on the pro-lobbyist Milk Bill, well, you might have enjoyed the stonewall and non-answer, perhaps provided by the no-answer-is-the-saf young Gloria. If that's leadership, then Davis' aides would indeed fit right in with the present Council."

14. Watcher wrote on March 22, 2008 9:57 AM:
"Todd Gloria and his boss, Congresswoman Susan Davis have lost a lot of credibility over their failure to take on Doug Manchester over his proposed Navy Broadway Complex project. Davis and Gloria have said in multiple forums that they think what Manchester is proposing is wrong for the site, but have sat on their hands instead of taking on "Popa Doug". Davis sits on the House Military Affairs committee and could force the Navy to change the project if she chose to, but she and Gloria have instead chosen to sit on the fence. That will cost Gloria in this election, as the voters know that when push comes to shove, he's wishy-washy."

15. Ed Wigdahl wrote on March 23, 2008 1:51 AM:
"I have a gained a lot of respect for Scott Lewis' ability to shake things up in the world of SD politics. But I worry that he is missing out on a lot when he focuses on only three candidates in the third council district (Gloria; Whitburn; and Hartley). In several articles, he omits the name of Paul Broadway. Like all the others, Paul Broadway obtained the number of signatures of registered voters required to get his name on the ballot, and paid his filing fee. When he is able to schedule around his obligations to his current employer, he attends meetings and forums taking place in the district, just as the other candidates do. When Paul isn't attending to duties on various neighborhood boards he serves on or meetings he attends, he is also walking door-to-door meeting voters."

16. Neighborhoods wrote on March 27, 2008 7:24 AM:
"There will be a debate/candidates' forum among all five candidates in the auditorium of Christ United Presbyterian Church on Monday April 7 at 6:45 pm. The church is located on the corner of 30th Street and Fir (1845 30th/3025 Fir). The forum is sponsored by a local neighborhood group (Golden Hill Neighborhood Association) and is cosponsored by The Big Kitchen. This will be an excellent opportunity to ask, listen, and learn what each candidate has to offer in seeking to represent the people of D3. The moderator, scholar and writer Mike Davis, is a Golden Hill resident. Scott, hope to see you there."

17. Glorias Money wrote on March 31, 2008 2:13 PM:
"I am so relieved that some of you are paying close attention to the money. Gloria also has Jim Sodorick, project manager for McMillan land development, Elliot Feuerstein, a Mira Mesa Shopping mall Developer, LeSar Development Company, Jennifer LeSar, LeSar development Toni Atkins partner, the entire Baldwin family of the Otay lakes tract developments and the list goes on and on and on."


Feedback Rules


  • Users may post more than one comment, but should not pose as multiple users. Multiple posts from the same IP address but with a different user name on each will be reviewed to determine whether abuse has occurred.
  • Posts with overly personal attacks or unsubstantiated allegations may be edited or deleted.
  • Please be patient with the posts -- there may be a delay before they appear on the site -- and make sure to enter the code in the "image verification" box.

  • Add Your Comments

    Current Word Count:
    fd83906
       

    A Charter School Rebuttal:

     

    Urban Discovery Academy responds to its critics.

    Friday, May 16, 2008 -- 4:24 pm

    Mayor Must Revisit Bargaining Table:

     

    He’s 'done negotiating,' but he’ll have to meet and confer with unions to get pension on the ballot.

    Friday, May 16, 2008 -- 5:11 pm

    'Inviting Further Litigation':

     

    More on the Bajagua scuttling.

    Friday, May 16, 2008 -- 10:30 am

    Sponsored By

    SURVIVAL IN SAN DIEGO

    Foreclosure Flood Continues:

     

    Filings up 103 percent over the year.

    Wednesday, May 14, 2008 -- 11:33 am

    LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

    Seals vs. People? Why?:

     

    Why are we allowing unreasonable people to demand that we spend money to disturb the seal colony that so many people enjoy visiting?

    Thursday, May 15, 2008 -- 1:58 pm

    CAFÉ SAN DIEGO

    'Fresh Face, Strong Voice and a Clear Eye':

     

    Marti Emerald can bring all of these assets to City Hall.

    Thursday, May 15, 2008 -- 7:50 pm

    COMMENTARY: SLOP

    Atkins' Goes for Housing Post:

     

    So much for it 'never crossing' her mind.

    Friday, May 16, 2008 -- 5:19 pm

    COMMENTARY: RICH TOSCANO

    Employment Goes Positive:

     

    After the first year-over-year decline since 1993, San Diego job growth is back in positive territory.

    Friday, May 16, 2008 -- 4:34 pm

    MOST POPULAR STORIES:

    Sponsored by


    Home About Us Contact Us Copyright Privacy Policy Site Sponsorship
    Copyright © 2008 voiceofsandiego.org. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Statement