voiceofsandiego.org: Slop... Bon Voyage, D-Cop
an independent nonprofit |
Support This Service

Bon Voyage, D-Cop

Published: Monday, July 28, 2008 7:08 PM PDT



What seems like a long time ago, I wrote a long profile about a media magnate, Dean Singleton, who was purchasing The Salt Lake Tribune. It's fair to say there was incredible consternation about what was going to happen to the paper. The paranoia was peppered with religious fears as the Tribune had always been the non-Mormon paper. But overall the concern was about journalism in Salt Lake City. Would it suffer if the paper was not allowed to go back to the family that once owned it and instead went to a corporation like Singleton's MediaNews?

The Tribune is a better paper now in my opinion. It focuses on local news. Its front page is filled with local, staff-written content -- not the wire stories from The New York Times and other services that are available in, say, The New York Times. However, Tribune is facing troubles just like the Union-Tribune here.

So it's based on that experience that I have to disagree with Point Loma Nazarene University's journalism professor, Dean Nelson, who recently was on the KPBS radio talking about the U-T's for sale sign. Nelson had some great insights, particularly when he talked about how great voiceofsandiego.org is and how we are a potential model for how communities can support journalism. I can't thank him enough for the recognition.

But I have to disagree with his statement that a corporate takeover of the Union-Tribune would definitely hurt the paper and the community. I don't know what publisher David Copley brings to the paper that's so special we have to worry about losing his influence. The paper is already shedding staff -- with rumors of more pain on the way -- and it's cutting what it offers readers. It's hard to imagine how it could contract any faster.

Besides that, though, new leadership could enforce a more local perspective on the Union-Tribune. New leadership might recognize that the paper should stop trying to be a news source for the country or the world -- because people can get national or international news from much better outlets than the random wire stories that the U-T regurgitates.

New leadership could bring ambition and passion to a paper that for some reason rarely publishes major Sunday investigations and has lost so many of it's talented local writers -- people who wrote with authority and context.

I could be wrong, but I've seen people worry about a family lose control of a local newspaper and, miraculously, I've seen that local newspaper suddenly write more local news. Let me be the first to eat crow if saying goodbye to David Copley somehow turns out to be a bad thing for San Diego journalism.

-- SCOTT LEWIS




8 Comments so far on this story...

Agreed. The idea is that David Copley is connected to San Diego and therefore lends local insight to the paper is silly. Does D-Cop even know where Sherman Heights is? Rolando? Grantville? I wouldn't count on it.

Posted by Jeffrey Davis | reply to this comment
July 28, 2008 6:37 pm

I agree. The paper now runs too many syndicated articles and too many arbitrary news briefs that make you wonder why one was selected over another. Too little emphasis on local cronyism and corruption. Despite the editor's avowed insistence on "watchdog journalism," the U-T presents precious little of it. No strong journalistic voices or columns. The so-called "improvements" (e.g., the new Dialog section on Sunday, the twice-weekly Our San Diego) are a joke and make you wonder if they have any purpose at all.

Posted by goodlead | reply to this comment
July 28, 2008 6:37 pm

The fact that Burl Stiff still has a job at that paper while real journalists are laid off, bought out or worse, shows exactly what David Copley's influence on that paper is. Shameful. Utterly shameful.

Posted by Point Loman | reply to this comment
July 28, 2008 9:30 pm

All I can say is: AMEN! Bring back local reviewers, travel writers, and more, and maybe I will actually subscribe again.

Posted by Keeks | reply to this comment
July 29, 2008 9:46 am

Maybe Dean Nelson's views about "losing" the Copley family represent preferring the devil you know to fearing the one you don't know. Actually, there are plenty of rich-enough, well-educated, civic-minded people in this town who could afford to buy the Union-Tribune and run it in the public interest, not as a profit-making venture or as amplifier for one political point of view. If the new owner(s) didn't have a feel for hands-on journalism, they could hire the publisher, editors and excellent reporters from among many talented people who are now employed (or being laid off) locally and at papers all over the country. (The U-T alone has at least six excellent writers still on staff now!) While we enjoy The San Diego Reader and voiceofsandiego.org for their unique attributes, the city needs a first-rate daily newsprint newspaper if we are going to progress as a community.

Posted by Fed Up But Hopeful | reply to this comment
July 29, 2008 10:27 am

My point in the radio program (in context) was to look at the Los Angeles Times and the Minneapolis Star-Tribune. Corporate ownership of those papers did not improve them. It is very nearly killing them. That was the point I was making when I voiced concern over outside corporate ownership of the Union-Tribune.

Posted by Dean Nelson | reply to this comment
July 29, 2008 8:30 pm

The VoSD OWNS the UT on objective local coverage-especially te OP-ED pieces and the feedback readers can post (err..if VoSD would POST all of my feedback!). I prefer the local news here as well as the different opinions of the people they get to host the Cafe. Can you imagine if the UT came up with a forum like the Cafe????? Readership would double.

Posted by Billy Bob Henry | reply to this comment
August 7, 2008 11:08 am

The U-T has reached a point where any change, particularly of ownership, could not hurt. The U-T has a particular problem with its editor - Bob Kittle. An editor with a irrational personal vendetta against an elected can not contribute anything to the benefit of the paper or its readers.

Posted by Skoishi | reply to this comment
August 8, 2008 4:16 pm


Reader feedback
  • Users may post more than one comment, but should not pose as multiple users. Multiple posts from the same IP address but with a different user name on each will be reviewed to determine whether abuse has occurred.
  • Posts with overly personal attacks or unsubstantiated allegations may be edited or deleted.
  • Please be patient with the posts -- there may be a delay before they appear on the site -- and make sure to enter the code in the "image verification" box.
Post a comment
Name:
Email:
Comments:
Current Word Count: Verification Code
f9bd8da

Scott Lewis on Politics

The Scott Lewis on Politics blog, abbreviated cleverly as SLOP, is a collection of observations, insights and the occasional scoop on public affairs in San Diego. Please feel free to e-mail Scott at scott.lewis@voiceofsandiego.org.


Listen to voiceofsandiego.org's radio program on AM 600 KOGO: Latest Episode (November 8): Scott Lewis and Michael Zucchet talk about the city's budget

Subscribe to the Podcast Feed



MOST POPULAR STORIES:



MOST POPULAR STORIES:


Copyright © 2009 voiceofsandiego.org. All Rights Reserved.