voiceofsandiego.org: Slop... Chula Vista Cratering, Layoffs Probable
an independent nonprofit |
Support This Service

Chula Vista Cratering, Layoffs Probable

Published: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 11:14 AM PDT



It's one thing to face the perfect storm with a new, well-built ship and a fresh, healthy crew. It's another to try to ride it out on a boat that's been falling apart, taking on water for some time and led by officers at war with each other.

The city of Chula Vista is looking at the looming local recession -- a horrible combination of plummeting property values and negative growth in sales taxes -- and sending out an S.O.S.

Interim City Manager Scott Tulloch and his finance team sat down with reporters at City Hall on Tuesday to present this PowerPoint and to outline the shortfall the city faces. Bottom line: real layoffs are on the way and so are real service cuts.

Scott Tulloch said despite the financial troubles, he still wants to be the permanent city manager.
These notices are becoming sadly routine. Every few months since last year, the city has announced that its projections were too optimistic and it will need to cut positions to continue. Remember when former City Manager David Garcia told a City Council hearing that the city was on the path to insolvency if it didn't derail itself?

Things have apparently gotten worse.

The officials gathered Tuesday said the Chula Vista was facing a $6.3 million deficit for this year. This means the budget they approved this summer foresees spending $6.3 million more than they look like they will receive. Next year, it looks even worse. The city will have to find an estimated $19 million or cut out that much to craft a budget.

To put it in perspective, the budget is $143 million right now -- cutting $19 million from that would mean a slashing of 13 percent of the whole budget.

Tulloch said he has a hard time imagining how that will be possible without actual layoffs. And no, not the classic government "position" cuts where the employees actually aren't laid off but vacancies eliminated instead. There are about 50 vacancies at the city. Cutting them all wouldn't even make up half of the shortfall.

The U-T's editorial writer for South Bay asked if this was just a "worst-case scenario" Tulloch and his staff were outlining. They shook their heads.

"I wish I could say that," said Maria Kachadoorian, Chula Vista's director of finance.

They said the city had given the same presentation to employees. The employees were understanding, the managers said. But the cutting their jobs will surely add more kindling to the ugly fire burning in that city.

Think back for a second on what's happened over the last few weeks: The city is watching a political war play out between Mayor Cheryl Cox and City Councilman Steve Castaneda. The councilman is up for re-election and both his battle and another council seat are being fiercely contended. As I've said, it's become a brutal playing field with money pouring into the campaigns from across the county.

At the same time, the city recently fired its manager in the midst of a bizarre scandal. All of this in a beautiful City Hall bought and paid for with money the city didn't have. It literally bet that the booming housing market would continue to fill its coffers for many years to come.

I asked Tulloch and his staff if the city was in any danger of defaulting on their bonds -- the many loans they took out to build the City Hall and other fancy facilities.

They said no, that the debt payments were budgeted and could be made under the scenarios outlined above.

But think about what that means for a second. City officials are about to begin what will not be the only round of layoffs. They will be cutting jobs because there is no alternative. They can't stop making the payments to the banks and investors to whom the city owes millions. That, after all, is known as bankruptcy. Can you imagine having to lay off employees with families and worries of their own just so you can keep making the payments on the office building you borrowed way too much money to buy?

If you can't, sit in on the next City Council hearing on the matter. On Nov. 17 at 6:30 they're having a special workshop and they'll explain exactly what it's like.

-- SCOTT LEWIS




Editor´s Choice
The reader comments you won't want to miss. (Editor's Choice selection do not represent the views of the editors. They are comments that seem to add to the discussion as opposed to less productive insults or arguments.)

link If you go here you can see the financial summary reported as part of the consent agenda on Tuesday Oct. 21. Page 3 is particularly interesting. When Maria said that the money to pay debts was budgeted for, I wonder if this included the debt of the Public Financing authority, because if you read agenda item 5 at the web site listed you will notice that the financial report does not include Redevelopment funds nor Public Financing Authority. As it happens the Public Finance Authority borrowed the money for the Police Station and the City Hall. Its debt payments do not show up on the financial report to be published Friday in the Star News. Earlier in the year we were told that to pay this debt required the fees from around 900 development projects? Will they be able to pay this?

Posted by CVresident | reply to this comment
October 29, 2008 12:24 pm

no matter what the circumstances, mr. tulloch and staff should be commended for their efforts to communicate. that's something very often missing these days, especially from governments.

Posted by the truth | reply to this comment
October 29, 2008 1:40 pm

9 Comments so far on this story...

I am a resident of Chula Vista and the present mess was brought about with deftness by politicians. Everytime we have an election, you see the signs proclaiming how the candidates are endorsed by Firefighters and Police unions. OK __ we need these people, but not at a cost of another pay raise. Ordinary people do not get raises every 2 to 3 years and certainly not with the generous scale that City Councils lavish on them in an attempt to gain their votes. To make matters worse, these employess have extended families who notice the "generosity" and decide they have to vote as a form of "Thanks". It is time to practice restraint and it it takes a hard headed City Manager like Dave Garcia, YOU SHOULD HAVE KEPT HIM! Admonish him, slap him on the wrist, but let him practice REAL MANAGEMENT!

Posted by John S. Mournian | reply to this comment
October 29, 2008 7:38 am

The city council gets to meet as the Public Finance authority and borrow and spend money that does not show up in the General Fund budget. Kind of like when they do the same as the Redevelopment Authority. I have heard that the Redevelopment fund must send 8% of its tax increment to the state by March, when are they planning on telling the public about the ramifications of this when 85% of that budget pays for debt service and admin.? How is the average, ordinary citizen supposed to understand the financial picture of the city when transactions are done in so many different ways? The splitting off of the Development Services Department from the General Fund was another slight of hand designed to make the General Fund look better off.

Posted by CVresident | reply to this comment
October 29, 2008 12:43 pm

...and Chula Vista Councilman McCann wants to get elected to the Assembly? Sounds like he's running away from the scene of the accident. Looks like the Chargers just crashed into Chula Vista's budget crisis. Chargers booster McCann doesn't tout his stadium plan now that he's running for another spot, he's running away from his past too. California deserves better, so I hope Marty Block wins next week.

Posted by Fred Williams | reply to this comment
October 29, 2008 4:39 pm

What's so interesting about all this is how long it has taken for this message to get out. CV has been putting a rosy spin on its finances for several years. Its finance staff are clueless and the layoffs should start there. The whole Chargers thing is a joke. They could never afford to facilitate a stadium. Tulloch is a good choice to right size them. Its just so unfortunate because it didn't have to get this bad.

Posted by nenebird | reply to this comment
October 29, 2008 6:14 pm

It is sad days in Chula Vista. If the City wants to get serious about cutting costs and saving jobs, there are plenty of ideas. The question is-does management want to get work...or continue to mull around in dysfunction and chaos? We all know this problem started with Steve Padilla and Co. spewing money out on body guards, Christmas floats, and getting rid of high level directors in his way by paying them to leave the City. Then you had the completely ridiculously long city manager search only to end up with drum roll...David Garcia?! Ask any employee who worked for him-he was unapproachable, ineffective, lacked any sort of leadership skills and wasted hours lurking around and leering at his computer screen. He made proposed budget cuts without even knowing who was working for him or what their function was in the Big Picture. While not chasing the local skirts in town, he was constantly being badgered by the belligerent Steve Castaneda and his inept Muppet Rudy Ramirez. Speaking of Council...it was they would not call out Fire and Police in the last round of budget cuts. Why? Love of public safety? Nope...most were running for re-election or higher office! So, the babies in blue continue to use fear tactics-threats of slower response times, scenes of uncontrollable fires due to lack of fire equipment, etc. to scare the public and officials into supporting their bloated budgets. So, here we are. Shady is back...back again! And this time...they are coming to affect the taxpayer big time. Look for your parks to be closed, phone calls to go unanswered, lights be off in the libraries, facilities to be locked up, programs to be cancelled, questions lay in wait, a defunct Nature Center, and plenty of bottom and middle rung employees (and citizens) to be laid off...just time for Christmas! All the while, the rich at the City get richer, the 15+ Directors to get their car allowances, the Council gets to continue with their pet projects, the boys in blue get to play with their shiny motorcycles and fire trucks and the smaller departments will get picked off one by one, Finance and Budget and Analysis Departments will get to operate under 52 managers and calculate more delusional forecasts, Redevelopment Dept. will get to...look at one another....and so on and so on. But to the orange shirt guys...don't let the door hit you on the way out. All because a Council couldn't play nice and City management couldn't get serious. Sad days indeed.

Posted by Sad Days in CV | reply to this comment
October 29, 2008 8:38 pm

Looks like the city of Chula Vista has about the same problems as the city of San Diego; they keep moving people from the same old gang of politicos and insiders around to different jobs titles – all while claiming they what CHANGE. What is it call, what conditions is it said that a person suffers under, when you do the same things, over and over again, yet expect to see a different result? Sorry Eddie, as long as the same old group of people are running things and projecting their same old shared opinions and ideologies…, nothing is going to change. More of the same (?,) the people in power are to blame.

Posted by Gregory | reply to this comment
October 30, 2008 8:08 am

So, who’s to be blamed for all these things? Is it the government or we, people? However, there is some good news about layoffs, if such a thing were possible. There are some good jobs that are left out there. There are companies that haven't been hurting for government online payday loans, but instead have been growing or holding steady over the last year or two. AFLAC, Quik Stop convenience stores, Devon Energy, just to name a few. If you're one of the lucky persons to work at these companies, then good for you, and let's hope you don't need unemployment or

Posted by Tessa K | reply to this comment
February 25, 2009 2:28 am


Reader feedback
  • Users may post more than one comment, but should not pose as multiple users. Multiple posts from the same IP address but with a different user name on each will be reviewed to determine whether abuse has occurred.
  • Posts with overly personal attacks or unsubstantiated allegations may be edited or deleted.
  • Please be patient with the posts -- there may be a delay before they appear on the site -- and make sure to enter the code in the "image verification" box.
Post a comment
Name:
Email:
Comments:
Current Word Count: Verification Code
aab8986

Scott Lewis on Politics

The Scott Lewis on Politics blog, abbreviated cleverly as SLOP, is a collection of observations, insights and the occasional scoop on public affairs in San Diego. Please feel free to e-mail Scott at scott.lewis@voiceofsandiego.org.


Listen to voiceofsandiego.org's radio program on AM 600 KOGO: Latest Episode (November 8): Scott Lewis and Michael Zucchet talk about the city's budget

Subscribe to the Podcast Feed



MOST POPULAR STORIES:



MOST POPULAR STORIES:


Copyright © 2009 voiceofsandiego.org. All Rights Reserved.