voiceofsandiego.org: Slop... Election Winners and Losers: Jennifer Tierney
an independent nonprofit |
March to 1,000 Members: 991 so far. Contribute today.

Election Winners and Losers: Jennifer Tierney

Published: Sunday, November 9, 2008 7:35 PM PST



Jennifer Tierney had two jobs this election: Get Sherri Lightner elected in the 1st District of the City Council, and do the same for Todd Gloria in the 3rd District.

Jobs well done.

While Republicans complain about the blue tsunami that wrecked their sandcastles, it's important to note a couple of facts: The moment the registrar of voters released the results of many absentee votes sent in days and weeks before the election, Lightner had a strong lead over her rival, Republican Phil Thalheimer.

This means simply that no wave of new Obama voters was needed at all to put Lightner over the line. She won with the voters who vote every election and who used to be reliably Republican in the 1st District.

Republicans should internalize this and learn from it rather than writing off their loss as the unfortunate consequence of a nationwide Democratic stomping.

Tierney worked to make this happen. She is not your average San Diego political consultant. She actually lives in Virginia and -- even in a polarized political environment -- she still works for both Democrats and Republicans, having orchestrated the wishes of liberals like Lightner and Gloria and Republican District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis.

She had no easy task in the District 3 race. The local Democratic Party and the Labor Council were bizarrely at odds over the race, which pitted two pretty liberal candidates against each other. The party ended up spending thousands on the race. Again, this was somewhat bizarre, considering how close the race in District 7 turned out to be -- money spent there shoring up the victory would not have been wasted.

Tierney's job in this confusion was to help Gloria make it clear he was a Democrat but also that he was perhaps slightly more moderate than his opponent, Stephen Whitburn. This would allow him to stay on top of Democratic enthusiasm but also garner the votes of some of the few Republican or center-right voters in the 3rd District.

It worked. And it worked even though Whitburn spent a bundle of his own money in the race and his passionate supporters, including City Councilwoman Donna Frye, worked extremely hard for him.

District 3 was going to go to a Democrat no matter what. Maybe someday, a new Republican will appeal to the district, but for now, it's hard to imagine. Given that, the district was lucky to have two eloquent and passionate men racing against each other -- testing and challenging each other -- for the post.

Gloria, it turns out, was lucky to have Tierney.

-- SCOTT LEWIS




9 Comments so far on this story...

"Gloria, it turns out, was lucky to have Tierney", as well as the money needed to pay Tierney....

Posted by Gregory | reply to this comment
November 9, 2008 8:04 pm

Gregory, That sounds like sour grapes. If you look at the publicly available expenditure reports for this campaign you will see that Whitburn actually paid his consultant more money than Gloria paid to Tierney.

Posted by Mary Well | reply to this comment
November 10, 2008 5:49 am

Unlike some, I do not have access to any such "insider information," but how interesting it is that you do.... We shall soon see what fruits will germinate and be harvested - by the seeds recently sown during this last election cycle. Nevertheless, be they sour or sweat, it will depend not upon opinions or projected rights to minimize the posts of others with your replies, but with the acts, actions, and policies supported by those "fresh fruits" recently placed into power. Near-do-wells, we will see.

Posted by Gregory | reply to this comment
November 10, 2008 8:22 am

Hey Gregory; I know it may stretch the mind and abilities of a few on here but it is a simple task anyone with a desire can look up campaign disclosure information. The info is public and all you have to do is find a way to the Registrar's Office and ask to see them. It's not insider information and it's not secret and not hidden and not some nefarious task to understand. Your post is a reflection of why Whitburn lost the race. There is not a thieving idiot behind every rock. Many may be standing on them or carrying them around in their pockets to throw at windows, Todd Gloria is the Councilman elect and should be given credit for such and a chance to help turn this City around.

Posted by Harold Freezedropper | reply to this comment
November 10, 2008 8:50 am

Sure, and when these last bunch of buffoons fail, like our mayor and the last gang has fail over the last four years, what then? Nothing, it will be more of the same-o things over and over again in good old Scam Diego. But do feel free to write whatever you like - even though I may not have that right in your eyes.

Posted by Gregory | reply to this comment
November 10, 2008 5:25 pm

Actually, this "insider information" is available online on the City Clerk's website.

Posted by Claudius | reply to this comment
November 10, 2008 10:16 am

This is interesting, I had to google any political consultant who's name rhimes with tiranny (I am assuming I have the right pronunciation of her last name). After reading the piece on Gorton and following Tom Sheppard, I have to say that this is a very interesting industry filled with very interesting people. It strikes me as interesting the extent to which these consultants are so flexible in who they represent. I always assumed politics was an affair of the heart. It is also interesting to whom the politicians entrust their campaigns too. Can you imagine in a hypothetical future where Steve Francis has a political career, him having to explain his relationship with George Gorton ala "Bill Ayers style" in a major campaign. This is not just being on the same board but actually paying the dude who was involved in watergate money... interesting.

Posted by basic civics | reply to this comment
November 10, 2008 12:52 pm

Some old one trick pony San Diego 'insiders' spin - spin, deflect, personalized, and attack.... I wonder if the Democrats will ever learn a new trick.

Posted by Gregory | reply to this comment
November 10, 2008 5:34 pm

This is incoherent. One trick pony? What are you talking about? Gregory -- you did understand the post above, right? Financing is a public record. Nothing insider about it. Go look it up.

Posted by frank | reply to this comment
November 12, 2008 6:25 am


Reader feedback
  • Users may post more than one comment, but should not pose as multiple users. Multiple posts from the same IP address but with a different user name on each will be reviewed to determine whether abuse has occurred.
  • Posts with overly personal attacks or unsubstantiated allegations may be edited or deleted.
  • Please be patient with the posts -- there may be a delay before they appear on the site -- and make sure to enter the code in the "image verification" box.
Post a comment
Name:
Email:
Comments:
Current Word Count: Verification Code
ce0ef3f

Scott Lewis on Politics

The Scott Lewis on Politics blog, abbreviated cleverly as SLOP, is a collection of observations, insights and the occasional scoop on public affairs in San Diego. Please feel free to e-mail Scott at scott.lewis@voiceofsandiego.org.


Listen to voiceofsandiego.org's radio program on AM 600 KOGO: Latest Episode (October 18): Andrew Donohue and Scott Lewis talk in depth about the Chargers stadium search, municipal bankruptcy and whether residents are too dumb to vote on the City Hall project.

Subscribe to the Podcast Feed



MOST POPULAR STORIES:



MOST POPULAR STORIES:


Copyright © 2009 voiceofsandiego.org. All Rights Reserved.