voiceofsandiego.org: Editorials... Good Times Can't Keep Rolling
an independent nonprofit |
March to 1,000 Members: 991 so far. Contribute today.

Good Times Can't Keep Rolling



Wednesday, Sept. 26, 2007 | The city of Oceanside, like most local governments, and like most homeowners, enjoyed watching property values rise at an extraordinary clip over the past several years. With the rise, came a frenzy of new construction and home sales, which translated into an increase in tax revenue pouring into Oceanside City Hall.

In 2002, Oceanside collected $18.3 million in property taxes.

In 2006, Oceanside received $48 million.

The city has adjusted to what it could only see as a new reality -- every year the tax base would increase. Next year, for example, new City Manager Peter Weiss said his team is planning for a 10 percent increase in property taxes. The next year, he said, the city should expect a 7 percent increase.

But Oceanside, like most local governments, and like many homeowners, also upwardly adjusted its spending habits over this time period.

Despite the boom, Oceanside's level of reserves remains one of the lowest in the region. A City Council member recently said that the city lives "paycheck to paycheck."

Weiss said he thinks the city's level of reserves is low -- 10 percent -- but that its understandable.

"When the city did have a significant amount of reserves, the City Council decided that rather than sit on all this money, it was time to give some of it back to the community," Weiss said.

Giving it back meant a new senior center, a new park and a new fire station.

At the same time, homeowners in the city were spending as well.

Some were spending too much.

The number of homes entering the foreclosure process in the region is shattering previous records and a ZIP code in Oceanside is leading the way. There are more home foreclosures in the ZIP code 92057 per 1,000 homes in the area than any other area in San Diego County.

Chula Vista is another city facing the same awesome rise in families being forced out of the homes they thought would be the best investments of their lives. San Diego's southern suburb has issued an alarm of sorts: the city is going to face an economic crunch and employees of City Hall may need to adjust their expectations for benefits and compensation.

And that alarm has been heard. Just last week, Standard & Poor's lowered the city's credit rating.

Oceanside, however, has no such plans and the city manager is not worried.

Weiss said his team is watching the housing slump closely but he has no plans to address its potential effects on the city's budget.

"I think it's an issue, but I don't think it's cause for us to overreact," he said.

New non-residential development will help offset any troubles, Weiss said. And although negotiations with employee groups begin again soon, Weiss has no plans to ask for any sacrifices.

Not long ago, Chula Vista had a similarly positive outlook on its economic future. It bragged about the benefits it offered police officers and other employees to lure them away from the city of San Diego, which has been under a cloud of economic doom for some time. Like Oceanside, Chula Vista adjusted to boom times with major spending.

The city added hundreds of new employees, constructed a new City Hall, built a new police station, renovated fire stations and constructed a new park. Like Oceanside, Chula Vista dipped into its reserves to do all this.

Now, Chula Vista financial officials call the situation "bleak." They told voiceofsandiego.org's Kelly Bennett recently that even though the city had seen a 14 percent increase in property taxes last year, this year the city should expect only a 4 percent growth next year and be prepared for even worse.

Chula Vista's newfound appreciation for the fact that things that go up must also come down is welcome. The city's leaders should be commended for understanding better what lies ahead. But they have yet to articulate how they plan to address it.

But other cities like Oceanside have yet to fully comprehend what the housing slump and spike in foreclosures will mean for their coffers. Analysts disagree on the future of the housing market -- whether it will plummet further or simply level off where it is -- but nobody argues that it will enter a boom time again any time soon.

Unfortunately, local governments have outlooks and spending plans that assume otherwise.

voiceofsandiego.org




4 Comments so far on this story...

Standard & Poor's lowered Chula Vista city's credit rating Monday from A to A-, “based on a prolonged trend of drawing down reserves” five years in a row, the company said in a report. The city's reserves are at 6 percent of the general fund. The city's policy is an 8 percent reserve. Chula Vista's spending (payroll and new administration facilities), as well as increased pension benefits have already drained the reserves. Don't give Chula Vista too much credit, these two budget obligations aren't going away and will only get bigger!

Posted by kevin | reply to this comment
September 26, 2007 2:52 am

Wow, The City of O-side (and CV) gave away the store during the BOOM years, and then when the boom years stopped the taxpayers are left holding the bag...Hmm... can anyone say Gray Davis ????????? This has happened time and time again, these fools live the high life and committ to LONG TERM spending during a short term boom. The City workers get rich while everyone else goes to the poor house.

Posted by Billy! Bob!! Henry!!! | reply to this comment
September 26, 2007 7:45 am

When this hits Encinitas don't give that city any slack for recognizing what lies ahead. It is easy to admit to what you are in for once you are over the edge. I have been asking Encinitas to be open about its assumptions regarding revenue projections for years. There is no way for a citizen to know how much trouble the city is going to be in when the housing market gets real. The city council did not want to discuss the reality that Chula Vista is now hitting. It might come back to haunt the Encinitas Taxpayers.

Posted by Kevin C | reply to this comment
September 26, 2007 7:02 pm

Every city is being harmed by the loss of revenue, except those who have turned to the new skill of creating huge redevelopment areas and then having the redevelopment tax shift occur where the county doesn't get its fair share of the taxes needed to keep the county running, and the cities with those Redevelopment Districts rake in the tax dollars meant for others. Also, since those Redevelopment Tax dollars are tied into the value of properties, the more properties that cities force to be improved, the more that is in their redevelopment bank account. That is just not fair to anyone. Not to the people stuck in the redevelopment districts, not to the rest of the people of the County of San Diego. Redevelopment law was intended to hel those in the redevelopment areas improve, instead, it often becomes their undoing.

Posted by San Marcos says, | reply to this comment
September 29, 2007 9:33 am


Reader feedback
  • Users may post more than one comment, but should not pose as multiple users. Multiple posts from the same IP address but with a different user name on each will be reviewed to determine whether abuse has occurred.
  • Posts with overly personal attacks or unsubstantiated allegations may be edited or deleted.
  • Please be patient with the posts -- there may be a delay before they appear on the site -- and make sure to enter the code in the "image verification" box.
Post a comment
Name:
Email:
Comments:
Current Word Count: Verification Code
b50bae2



MOST POPULAR STORIES:


Copyright © 2009 voiceofsandiego.org. All Rights Reserved.