voiceofsandiego.org: People... A New Focus on Fat
an independent nonprofit |
Support This Service

A New Focus on Fat

SDSU Women's Studies professor Esther Rothblum is the editor of The Fat Studies Reader. Photo: Sam Hodgson



Friday, Sept. 11, 2009 | In the introduction to her forthcoming book, San Diego State University Women's Studies professor Esther Rothblum describes The Fat Studies Reader as "the first comprehensive anthology that maps the contours of the emerging field."

The field brings together disciplines like law, history, popular culture, and health to question stigmas associated with weight, to frame weight prejudice as an important civil rights issue, and to "provide much-needed momentum for social justice for people of all sizes."

In The Fat Studies Reader, Rothblum and co-editor Sondra Solovay have compiled the work of 53 authors whose multi-disciplinary research on fat studies examines and critiques prevailing assumptions around being fat in a country obsessed with the "obesity epidemic."

We sat down with Rothblum to discuss the emerging academic field, its attention-grabbing name, and why she thinks a shift in our focus on fat is more important than ever.

I was struck by the name of your field. What is fat studies?
Fat studies is a field that looks at how we can prevent discrimination based on body size. People vary tremendously in height and weight, and it really recognizes that there's a huge diversity of appearance but that we should not discriminate based on a particular weight, for example. It also asks the question of who stands to gain -- no pun intended -- by this enormous focus we have on weight and dieting, and who loses.

The use of the word "fat," just like other groups that have reclaimed words as they've organized, ... is saying let's take a word that really describes who we are and let's even take one that has been used in a negative way, and use it to describe the field...

What's new about fat studies right now is it's new to the academy, to universities, but fat studies in terms of activism has been around for a few decades.

So why is it emerging as a more accepted field in academia now?
There have been pockets of people doing research and I would say it started with people who were coming out of medicine, health, nutrition, who were confusing health with aesthetics. It's really not true that you can tell how fit somebody is based on how they look. And it's certainly not true this assumption that fat equals unhealthy. There's very little data for that.

So they started to look at some of the studies that were coming out and tried to show through data that these assumptions we have aren’t true. More recently, there were enough pockets of people doing work that it began to spread more into popular culture, blogs, literature, history, and more of the humanities.

In the introduction to your book you present fat studies as a potential tool for changing people's attitudes toward what it means to be fat. How does the field go about doing that?
There are so many different avenues. ... In terms of changing people's minds, so many people feel too fat regardless of whether they are or not. We all know about people who are starving and very thin and yet feel fat.

So in terms of changing it, there has to be an awareness of how the pharmaceutical industries and many of the aesthetic industries like plastic surgery and all kinds of fashion industries are driving this. It almost doesn’t matter what they're focusing on. People have been told how to look throughout history and across cultures. Right now it happens to be weight in Western cultures. So to have people be aware that this is really being driven by a profit motive, then getting people to organize.

Is there resistance because this sort of movement could encourage people not to address potential health problems associated with being overweight?
In terms of academia, most people are unaware of fat studies. There's no department of fat studies anywhere. Universities, contrary to what the general public believes, love it when there is controversy over new areas.

In terms of health, the most fascinating thing to me -- and I'm not a health educator -- is that people are getting fatter and people are living much longer. We are living 20 years longer on average than people born in the 1930s, compared to people born now. As one of our authors says, we're getting fatter and we're getting healthier. That is so counterintuitive to what the general public believes. ...

Another factor about the health issue is that in this country weight and income are so strongly associated, especially for women. Poor people tend to weigh more and rich people tend to weigh less. The reason that is so important is that ... poor people in this country have poor health care. When you're comparing fat people and thin people on health, you're really comparing poor people and rich people. So you've got to either focus only on fat and thin middle class people or you have to control statistically for income. But that is a big issue that we never seem to think about.

So what kind of challenges does that pose to the field?
Well the early years of fat studies were focused on trying to prove the health stuff and the lack of effectiveness of dieting. ... What's happened more recently is people have said, let's focus on fat characters in movies and films. Let's talk about the history of fat across countries, fat literature, and so on. ...

We tend to get so obsessed with the health and dieting area that we forget all the other stuff.

How do you elevate the discourse to be more inclusive of all these elements?
With every group that has fought for its rights, there is a long history that we're often not aware of. We tend to think about the recent past.

What has been difficult for fat studies maybe more than some other groups are the enormous markets that most companies stand to gain by trying to get people to be unhappy and lose weight. When people stop focusing on their appearance, it affects millions of people. The potential that millions of people could stop dieting, buying diet food or going to health spas is very threatening.

Almost every time I'm interviewed by the media, the last two paragraphs of the article will interview somebody who does weight loss surgery or diets, who will say that dieting is good and that people who are fat are unhealthy. It shows that we're still at a point where there has to be this last word by the status quo.

A colleague of mine will say, it's always, "P.S., we hate you." Somehow fat studies is still so radical. ... So many people just can't believe that fat can be good. It's kind of shocking in a way.

Fat studies looks at the "intersection of oppressions." Does that mean being a fat minority woman in a society that still has prejudices against all three categories?
This field has a lot of intersections. First of all, women are told in general how to look more than men, so there's much more focus on fitness at the moment. You see that especially with the correlation between gender and income. ... If I had two sisters, one very thin and one very fat, my thinner sister would most likely marry a wealthier husband. Men make more money than women, so she would be much wealthier.

Author Paul Campos ... says we're not allowed to be racist and we're not allowed to be classist, so now focusing on fat is code for poor people, who tend to be fatter. And of course in our country people of color often tend to be poorer. So saying negative things about fat has become code for not being allowed to say negative things based on race and class. So there are many intersections in that sense.

We can also talk about age. People typically gain weight as they get older. Ageism is in there as well. There are a lot of intersections here with age, race, income, and gender.

What about sexuality?
One of my colleagues used to say she thought people who were in relationships with men were forced to be thinner. That meant heterosexual women and gay men. People in relationships with women had less focus on how they could look. That meant heterosexual men and lesbians. Whether you were a lesbian or a heterosexual woman, being female meant you often had dieted and been told how to look.

The other thing is people who are bisexual who have been involved with both men and women. A student of mine asked bisexual women and found that when they've been involved with men, they say that's when they were supposed to be thinner, that's when they felt bad, that's when they had to wear certain kinds of clothes. So what's so interesting to me about bisexuals is the same person involved with women versus men is changing their behavior.

One of our (transgender) authors writes about how when he is seen as a man, people see him as big and muscular. And when he's seen as a woman, people look down on him and make hostile comments. He's the same person, same weight.

A few questions ago I caught myself using the word "overweight." What do you think of the word?
People really use the term incorrectly because the average in this country for women is like a size 14. ...When we talk about normal weight, we don't usually picture a size 14. So overweight and underweight are really inaccurate because they assume that either we're at the wrong weight or should be at another one.

Obesity is a Greek word, and we tend to use Greek and Latin for medical conditions. So other groups like homosexuals, which is a Greek Latin word, used gay. Organizing groups try to move away from the medical term into more of the in-your-face term. I don't like obesity, I don't like overweight or underweight. What I like about "fat," is it's a short word and it says what it is. Some people weigh more because they have more muscles. ... Fat has to do with body fat, and that's what people fear.

Is there anything else?
Most people haven't heard about the topic. It's very new and nobody really covers it. There's so much focus on what we call obesity studies, which is new drugs for weight loss, and surgeries, and the idea that there's an epidemic of obesity among children. The moral panics are very interesting.

This is a universal issue in this country. The pressure to be thin used to be just women, and then it permeated men and children. And now I even see diet pet food. Is your dog too fat?

-- Interview by ADRIAN FLORIDO




17 Comments so far on this story...

Sixty percent of our population is overweight or obese. Just because the average size for a woman is 14 doesn't mean that the average weight is a healthy weight. The terms "overweight" and "underweight" are accurate descriptors as they refer to Body Mass Index ratings that fall outside the healthy weight zone....I agree that persons struggling with overweight or obese should not be discriminated against nor should anyone with a physical or mental health issue. However, to insinuate that no problem exists because of longer life expectancies is absolutely misleading--twisting a correlation to appear as a cause. Fight the good fight to get equal rights for all, but don't offer misinformation to the masses about health and wellness.

Posted by Michelle | reply to this comment
September 11, 2009 8:03 pm

BMI ranges, as currently labeled, do not correlate with health nor life expectancy. The "overweight" BMI classification has the longest life expectancy. BMI is a measurement of a person's overall size, but indicates nothing about that person's health status. People have always come in all shapes and sizes, and they always will. Given there is no safe, effective, permanent way to alter one's weight in a significant (30+ lbs) way for the vast majority of folks, it's far more practical and life-enhancing to promote healthy behaviors and ignore the scale.

Posted by Maggie | reply to this comment
September 13, 2009 5:23 pm

The discrimination against the obese is just another arm of the health facist hate mongering crowd of progressives........ hate smokers,fat people and drinkers regardless if your a moderate drinker with no legal infractions......... bans were the begining of their deep hate and now they are using those same tactics against the obese and alcohol............. is a lil tidbit they tried last year...this really says it... Mississippi Legislature 2008 Regular Session House Bill 282 House Calendar | Senate Calendar | Main Menu Additional Information | All Versions Current Bill Text: | Description: Food establishments; prohibit from serving food to any person who is obese. Background Information: Disposition: Active Deadline: General Bill/Constitutional Amendment Revenue: No Vote type required: Majority Effective date: July 1, 2008

Posted by harleyrider1978 | reply to this comment
September 12, 2009 8:47 am

History of Actions: 1 01/25 (H) Referred To Public Health and Human Services;Judiciary B ----- Additional Information ----- House Committee: Public Health and Human Services*, Judiciary B Principal Author: Mayhall Additional Authors: Read, Shows Title: AN ACT TO PROHIBIT CERTAIN FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS FROM SERVING FOOD TO ANY PERSON WHO IS OBESE, BASED ON CRITERIA PRESCRIBED BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH; TO DIRECT THE DEPARTMENT TO PREPARE WRITTEN MATERIALS THAT DESCRIBE AND EXPLAIN THE CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING WHETHER A PERSON IS OBESE AND TO PROVIDE THOSE MATERIALS TO THE FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS; TO DIRECT THE DEPARTMENT TO MONITOR THE FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ACT; AND FOR RELATED PURPOSES. ----- Bill Text for All Versions ---- | As Introduced (Current) Information pertaining to this measure was last updated on 01/29/2008 at 11:24 End Of Document .

Posted by harleyrider1978 | reply to this comment
September 12, 2009 8:52 am

Did you purposefully superimpose Miss Rothblums picture over a group of slim co-eds? For those of us "fully grown" men; I look forward to the rest of the stroy. Go Girl

Posted by spreccor | reply to this comment
September 12, 2009 9:56 am

Great interview and it sounds like an interesting book. This field of study needs to be examined by society especially as it impacts medical and social availability for fat people. The whole fat-acceptance movement, which started in 1969 in America by Bill Fabrey and the National Association to Advance Fat Acceptance, is going to be the next big (pun intended) social movement of the 21st century. More reading on this subject can be found at link

Posted by Mara | reply to this comment
September 12, 2009 11:40 am

I love this discussion. Thank you, VOSD, for including this Q&A! I'm interested - is "obesity" - or a choice to be heavier than the ubiquitous size 4/6/8 - ever considered to be, of one's own volition, an act of defiance against societal expectations? And possibly, as such, an expression of greater mental health?

Posted by Sara_H | reply to this comment
September 12, 2009 1:44 pm

Are you serious? Greater mental health!? HA!

Posted by rj | reply to this comment
September 13, 2009 2:29 pm

As a medical professional who has fought against the biases held against obese people in society, and against the almost ubiquitous bias against obese patients within the medical profession, I am always shocked when people claiming to be champions against discrimination fall back on myth that obesity does not cause severe health consequences. There has been so much solid scientific evidence that severe obesity (BMI>35) is associated with numerous adverse health consequences, that to concoct an argument to the contrary based on loosely correlated facts is simply an exercise in how to lie with statistics. For a scholar to do this is irresponsible. On the other hand, there most definitely is a deep prejudice against obesity in society. I applaud serious efforts to eliminate this prejudice since this bias prevents key decision makers from supporting efforts to find a solution.

Posted by Brian B. Quebbemann, MD | reply to this comment
September 12, 2009 3:23 pm

The fact is being overweight will kill you early. Being overweight wears out your ankles, knees and hips, and puts a load on your heart and lungs. Get control of your caloric intake and do something positive for yourself before you become one of the legion of morbidly obese riding about on electric scooter....slowing dying. Being overweight is voluntary, so please stop playing the victim.

Posted by frankfitz | reply to this comment
September 12, 2009 5:02 pm

"...the average in this country for women is like a size 14. ..." Whoa. When I married my European wife 15 years ago she was a size 2. Today, she's a size 2. Twenty years from now, she'll be a size 2. She achieves this by (literally) working her keester off. I'm a size 34 waist, have been for 40 years since high school. I have a very simple philosophy: don't buy bigger clothes. Works well. The "Stop Eating So Much" diet, which I saw on a TV show, also seems like it could be effective. Assuming, of course, that one harbors the apparent illusion that obesity is not a condition conducive to optimum physical or mental health. In the meantime, lets hope the cash-strapped state government doesn't cut funding for Fat Studies. Let's take the ax to phys ed classes instead.

Posted by 555 | reply to this comment
September 13, 2009 12:15 am

Interesting article but it seems oddly anectodal coming for an institute of higher learning. To suggest that obese individuals don't have health issues is akin to suggesting that global warming doesn't exist - a curious way to ignore the majority of scientific findings. Obesity and type 2 diabetes are big contributers to the health care crisis and they are not indicators of good health. "Fat" studies or "physical education"? Which one costs society more in the long run? Life is a series of choices and I don't want to pay for others bad choices so take some personal reponsibility and contribute to society rather than taking.

Posted by Christopher Morrow, AICP | reply to this comment
September 14, 2009 2:35 pm

The idea that "people are heavier than ever, and living longer than ever" is no longer valid as life expectancy has begun dropping due to obesity (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7209499). The newest generation will be the first ever with a lower life expectancy than their parents. BECAUSE OF FAT! Can we stop pretending everyone is a-ok and start addressing what is a chronic, expensive, and deadly facet of our lazy American way of life?

Posted by andrew | reply to this comment
September 15, 2009 11:13 am

Prof. Rothblum is right on target. I am looking forward to reading her book. It is obvious from the knee-jerk fatphobic comments from some of the writers that we have a very long way to go before the public can be objective about this controversial subject. I found out years ago that it is easier to argue with someone about their religion than it is to try to cast doubt on their preconceived notions about diet and weight. Despite some very good studies that indicate otherwise, people persist in equating fat with unhealthy and unfit, and thin with healthy and fit. There are billions of dollars to be made by making fat people hate themselves, and other people discriminate against them. Bill Fabrey Biomedical Engineer (retired) Council on Size & Weight Discrimination Mt Marion, NY

Posted by Bill Fabrey | reply to this comment
September 15, 2009 6:45 pm

Bravo!

Posted by abigail vines | reply to this comment
September 16, 2009 6:58 pm

Congratulations to Professor Rothblum and the other academics who are speaking from the facts and not merely managed care political rhetoric. As someone who has personally been both obese, overweight and anorexic, and now... healthy, recovered and of "normal?" weight, I think Fat studies is long overdue. And for those of you are curious.... I was much healthier and fitter when I was heavier than I am now at a "normal" weight.... I have lived in Los Angeles, London England and Lincoln, Nebraska and the BIGGEST culture shock I have ever had was losing weight. link

Posted by Rachael Stern | reply to this comment
September 15, 2009 8:01 pm

Your article was very interesting, kind of inspiring. The word needs to get out about the words fat and obesity. I myself would be considered obese by the BMI. What the index does not account for is my muscle. I weigh around 250 pounds. The doctor says I am healthy but at the same time fat. It works for me in my football career. I work out every day and participate in various sports for the last 6 years. In that time span, I have researched and presented the ‘obesity’ countless times. Your study is something I would love to look into. In the article you said the last sentence is what stays in the mine. Now that I think about it, I did see diet pet food at Wal-Mart. What is the world coming too? When it comes to women though thinner is not necessarily better, but there is

Posted by Luis | reply to this comment
October 10, 2009 4:53 pm


Reader feedback
  • Users may post more than one comment, but should not pose as multiple users. Multiple posts from the same IP address but with a different user name on each will be reviewed to determine whether abuse has occurred.
  • Posts with overly personal attacks or unsubstantiated allegations may be edited or deleted.
  • Please be patient with the posts -- there may be a delay before they appear on the site -- and make sure to enter the code in the "image verification" box.
Post a comment
Name:
Email:
Comments:
Current Word Count: Verification Code
06ca6e0



MOST POPULAR STORIES:


Copyright © 2009 voiceofsandiego.org. All Rights Reserved.