More than 80 percent of the big cost savings projected by the city of San Diego’s financial reform ballot measure comes from two reforms long discussed at City Hall: competitive bidding and retiree health care.

As city Chief Operating Officer Jay Goldstone noted in the city’s official fiscal analysis of the measure, reform conditions would be met if the city squeezed just $1 in savings from both items. That would trigger a five-year, half-cent sales tax increase if the measure, Proposition D, is passed by voters. But Goldstone believes the city can go much further — $69 million annually — without breaking a sweat.

“These are estimates based what I believe is some conservative approaches to this,” Goldstone said.

For competitive bidding, Goldstone said the Mayor’s Office had six to eight city departments ready to go through “managed competition” once the city met the condition outlined in the ballot measure and ratified the process. Those departments include city’s fleet maintenance and print shop. Managed competition allows the city to bid out city functions and outsource them if private sector bids are a certain percentage below those offered by city departments.

Support Nonprofit Journalism Today

 Learn more about member benefits

Goldstone then took estimates from a widely cited 2007 study that showed the city could save 10 percent to 25 percent per contract using managed competition. Applying 25 percent savings to the departments he selected, Goldstone reached $27 million.

One of the study’s authors, Erik Bruvold, approved Goldstone’s methodology.

“I think a $27 million number is a plausible way of drilling down from our study’s conclusion assuming that the cumulative cost of the six to eight functions Jay has identified total a bit north of $100 million and that we are talking about functions like print shop or fleet maintenance,” said Bruvold, head of the National University System Institute for Policy Research.

Goldstone’s estimates on reducing the city’s $1.3 billion retiree health care liability come from a soon-to-be released study from by the city and its labor unions.

One of the options presented in the study — freezing the city’s benefit at current rates for current employees — would knock $300 million off the liability and result in $42 million of annual savings, Goldstone said.

He stressed that any changes to retiree health care must come through labor negotiations and the benefit freeze wasn’t necessarily the city’s position.

“I think the city could do better than that,” Goldstone said.


    This article relates to: Election, Government, News, Prop D

    Written by Dagny Salas

    Dagny Salas was web editor at Voice of San Diego from 2010 to 2013. She was an investigative fellow at VOSD from 2009 to 2010.

    VOSD Comment Policy

    Voice of San Diego’s Comment Policy

    If you have any questions about this policy please email If you have a longer, more thoughtful comment, consider submitting a commentary.


    Sign Up For VOSD’s Free Email Newsletters Today

    Enter your email address below.
    Choose your newsletters:

    To stop this message from appearing for 30 days, Log in. If you’re a current subscriber, you can update your preferences by choosing a new combination.


    San Diego’s Top Stories Delivered to Your Inbox

    Get the FREE daily Morning Report.

    To stop this message from appearing for 30 days, Log in.


    Log In or Register

    Registered users can follow narratives, comment on articles, check donation history and more.

    If you’ve never logged in before, please create a free account. If you’re a VOSD member, please use the email address associated with your donations.

    Forgot Password?