bike-voice
help-us-raise
donate-button

     

    The industrial hub of Grantville is overlooked by new development, literally.

    Recently built apartments look down on this bustling valley of strip malls and light industrial buildings where I have spent the last couple of days as part of my ongoing coverage of the District 7 City Council election.

    Soon, residential development will begin appearing in the valley itself. How that development happens, and who ends up representing the neighborhoods that will be affected by it, has become a crucial issue in this year’s council election.

    Yesterday, I took a tour of Mission Gorge Road and the nearby suburban neighborhood of Allied Gardens. I was driven by Anthony Wagner, a community activist and lifelong resident of Allied Gardens who is very involved in the ongoing argument about how and when this corridor will be developed into residential properties.

    Full disclosure here: Wagner’s also volunteering on candidate Mat Kostrinsky’s campaign. He’s clearly partisan, but he’s also very knowledgeable about the various projects that will likely pop up along this stretch in the next few years.

    Wagner told me that much of the land in this valley is owned by four major players who have already planned, and in some cases, secured permits for, large apartment projects.

    How those projects end up getting planned and built will, to a large extent, define the future of Grantville as a neighborhood, Wagner said. Those apartment projects will have a direct impact on the 4,000 or so homes in nearby Allied Gardens, as well as the residents of a small cluster of homes in Grantville itself.

    Will the area, known as Mission Gorge, become a traffic-congested mess of strip malls and high-density housing like Mission Valley? Or could it become a well-planned, livable community?

    How the area evolves depends, to a large extent, on the stewardship of the City Council member who ends up representing it.

    The City Council has the power to approve, deny and shape new development. It can insist on community involvement in planning projects and can hold developers accountable for providing infrastructure, parks and open space as well as bedrooms. Or, it can sit back and let Mission Valley happen again.

    I asked Wagner to provide me with some key information about the four major projects already in the works.

    Here they are:

    The Centerpointe at Grantville:

    • Approved: 2005.

    • Address: 4304 Twain Ave.

    • Size: 12-acre parcel with eight lots.

    • Notes: The project will involve a rezone of approximately 12 acres from an industrial zone to a multifamily residential zone. The project could contain as many as 588 multi-family residential units and about 135,228 square feet of office, retail and restaurant space.

    Archstone Mission Gorge:

    •Approved: 2008.

    •Address: Mission Gorge Road and Greenbrier Avenue.

    •Size: 444 apartment units

    Shawnee at Riverbend Mission Gorge:

    •Not yet approved, draft environmental impact report for public comment ended April 9th, 2012.

    •Address: Mission Gorge Road and Old Cliffs Road.

    23 acre site, 996 Apartments and 23-27 row homes along the San Diego River; 37,000 square feet of retail and commercial space.

    Superior Ready Mix Development, Mission Gorge:

    •Not yet approved by Superior Raady Mix owns the land rights until 2033

    •Address: 7500 Mission Gorge Road.

    •Size: Could be as large as 2,000-plus apartments, in addition to mixed-use development.

    For some background reading on Mission Gorge development, you should check out these two stories by Dorian Hargrove in the San Diego Reader.

    As an added bonus, here’s a little video I shot of Wagner standing up on the bluff overlooking Mission Gorge Road, where three of the big developments are planned. It’s a good way to visualize the area that’s in discussion here.

    Will Carless is an investigative reporter at voiceofsandiego.org currently focused on local education. You can reach him at will.carless@voiceofsandiego.org or 619.550.5670.

    Follow @WillCarless

    Follow @voiceofsandiego

    Like VOSD on Facebook.

      This article relates to: Community, Election, Government, Neighborhoods, Public Safety
      Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

      Written by Will Carless

      Will Carless is the former head of investigations at Voice of San Diego. He currently lives in Montevideo, Uruguay, where he is a freelance foreign correspondent and occasional contributor to VOSD. You can reach him at will.carless.work@gmail.com.

      14 comments
      Omar Passons
      Omar Passons subscribermember

      entire funding plan in place for how the city will absorb all of the financial impacts that such projects will generate. Not just the short-term impacts that the voters see immediately. And if they don't understand the 20-30 year impacts, they need to follow the lead of certain Council who are not afraid to simply ask the engineers who are paid to know these things. This is not a fault of the developers. Their job is to build. It's our city's job to figure out how to make it work before it grants the approval. And it's our job as citizens to hold them accountable for doing just that.

      omarpassons
      omarpassons

      entire funding plan in place for how the city will absorb all of the financial impacts that such projects will generate. Not just the short-term impacts that the voters see immediately. And if they don't understand the 20-30 year impacts, they need to follow the lead of certain Council who are not afraid to simply ask the engineers who are paid to know these things. This is not a fault of the developers. Their job is to build. It's our city's job to figure out how to make it work before it grants the approval. And it's our job as citizens to hold them accountable for doing just that.

      Robert Leif
      Robert Leif subscribermember

      The City Planning Department is systematically replacing industrial property, which provides jobs, with residential property which provides taxes. The end result will be increased unemployment and reduced availability of water. Frankly, before anyone criticizes the Federal Government for unemployment and slow economic growth, they should carefully look at what their own city is doing.

      rleif
      rleif

      The City Planning Department is systematically replacing industrial property, which provides jobs, with residential property which provides taxes. The end result will be increased unemployment and reduced availability of water. Frankly, before anyone criticizes the Federal Government for unemployment and slow economic growth, they should carefully look at what their own city is doing.

      Richard Ross
      Richard Ross subscribermember

      Can we provide potable water and food for infinate population growth or will we begin to look like those South Africans sitting in huddled groups with their starved rib cages showing.

      Activist
      Activist

      Can we provide potable water and food for infinate population growth or will we begin to look like those South Africans sitting in huddled groups with their starved rib cages showing.

      Dale Peterson
      Dale Peterson subscribermember

      San Diego State has designs on expanding into East Mission Valley. Significantly more traffic is coming to the Mission Valley-Grantville corridor. And, the solution is not, "Oh well, that's the price tag of progress."

      Dale Peterson
      Dale Peterson

      San Diego State has designs on expanding into East Mission Valley. Significantly more traffic is coming to the Mission Valley-Grantville corridor. And, the solution is not, "Oh well, that's the price tag of progress."

      Don Wood
      Don Wood subscriber

      The really sad thing is that the big developers like Fenton and Sudberry don't even need the city council person reprsenting the district to support their giant project to get them through the city council. That was demonstrated when Donna Frye, who represented Mission Valley, opposed the huge Quarry Falls/Civitas project, pointing out how it would further ruin the valley. But the developer simply bought the votes of a majority of the other city council members and got its upzoning approvals and entitlements. This is San Diego, where money talks and politicians listen.

      Don Wood
      Don Wood

      The really sad thing is that the big developers like Fenton and Sudberry don't even need the city council person reprsenting the district to support their giant project to get them through the city council. That was demonstrated when Donna Frye, who represented Mission Valley, opposed the huge Quarry Falls/Civitas project, pointing out how it would further ruin the valley. But the developer simply bought the votes of a majority of the other city council members and got its upzoning approvals and entitlements. This is San Diego, where money talks and politicians listen.

      Anthony Wagner
      Anthony Wagner subscribermember

      That is why I'm supporting Mat Kostrinsky for San Diego City Council, D7.

      AnthonyWagnerSD
      AnthonyWagnerSD

      That is why I'm supporting Mat Kostrinsky for San Diego City Council, D7.

      Jon Osborn
      Jon Osborn subscriber

      Would that be a good thing, or a bad thing?

      Jon Osborn
      Jon Osborn

      Would that be a good thing, or a bad thing?


      ×

      Log In or Register

      If you’ve never logged in before, you must first create an account. If you’re a VOSD donor, please use the email address associated with your membership.

      Registered users can check donation history, follow narratives, comment on stories, and RSVP for events.

      Forgot Password?
      New to VOSD? Create an account

      ×
      Test Modal
      • Note: You cannot change your username.

      ×

      cow-modal