Public art isn’t just about the art — it’s about the chance it gives government to engage neighborhoods, argues Lucas O’Connor, a self-described “progressive campaign consultant” who works for several local Democrats, in a blog post this morning.

O’Connor wrote the post (the first of two parts, he says) in response to this conversation we’ve been having about public art in the wake of the mayor’s revelation that he wants to cut public art funding.

Here’s a bit from his post:

Plus, when communities join together to create shared spaces with public art, it also gives a community a vested interest in the maintenance of that space. It gives the community members a reason to stand up against negative graffiti. It gives them a reason to defend those shared spaces as family-friendly, safe areas. And it connects neighbors and local business owners in a collaborative effort to build a cooperative community that seeks out solutions that are mutually beneficial. It’s the difference between an actual community and just a bunch of people who are near each other.

O’Connor’s perspective reminded me of the story we heard from Eva Vargas, who lives in southeastern San Diego and fears the cuts to public art could have a larger impact on her neighborhood. Do you agree with O’Connor’s perspective? Leave a comment or send me an email.

Please contact Kelly Bennett directly at or 619.325.0531 and follow her on Twitter: @kellyrbennett.

    This article relates to: Arts
    Tags: , ,

    Written by Kelly Bennett

    Kelly Bennett is a freelance contributor to Voice of San Diego. You can reach her directly at


    Log In or Create an Account

    Registered users can check donation history, follow narratives, comment on stories, and RSVP for events.

    Forgot Password?
    New to VOSD? Create an account

    Test Modal
    • Note: You cannot change your username.