Poway Unified School District Superintendent John Collins may be trying to negotiate an exit deal, but he’s also jockeying for a 4 percent raise for himself, his three associate superintendents and district managers before he goes.

Collins was listed on Sunday’s special board meeting agenda as the district’s “agent negotiator” with managers and associate superintendents.

District staff last month unsuccessfully sought board approval for a 4 percent raise for district managers, retroactive to July 1. Collins also sought one-year contract extensions for his three associate superintendents from June 2016 to June 2017 on Dec. 15, but all four items were pulled from December’s agenda for later consideration.

Collins declined to answer questions about his participation in raise talks.

If You Value This Service, Please Donate Today

 Learn more about member benefits

No board action was reported Sunday, but Collins’ involvement in negotiations could be legally problematic because he automatically gets the same raises his managers get under the terms of his contract, and so do his associate superintendents.

Me-too clauses, as they are called, are legal, but California laws generally prohibit self-dealing to ensure public officials have only the public’s interests in mind. Contracts made by officials with a financial interest in the outcome may be voided in some cases, and the officials can even face civil and criminal penalties.

With pay at $337,000, a 4 percent raise would mean an extra $13,500 for Collins.

John Almond, a former school superintendent in Northern California who now assists school districts through the Association of California School Administrators, said that in general, me-too clauses can be problematic.

“I don’t recommend a me-too clause if you are going to be the person sitting at the table negotiating,” he said. “I don’t know too many superintendents anymore who have me-too.”

If they do, Almond said he recommends that raises be contingent on a good evaluation, something Collins’ contract does not include.

“As an administrator, you may be in charge of negotiating and you don’t ever want to be accused of benefiting,” Almond said.

The negotiations are not the only prospective problem with Sunday’s meeting, which was attended by three out of five board members. The gathering may have violated tightened state laws passed in 2011 that prohibit executive pay discussions at special meetings.

Newly appointed board president Michelle O’Connor-Ratcliff, who convened Sunday’s emergency meeting, did not respond to requests for comment. The superintendent’s assistant said the district is confident no violations occurred.

The school board Sunday continued their negotiations with Collins about his employment, too, according to the agenda.

District officials have been coy about the goal of the negotiations, publicized on the closed session agenda this week as “anticipated litigation,” but Collins has said his relationship with the board isn’t going well and the school board hired its own attorney late last year to represent board members’ interests in talks with Collins.

Collins has led the district since July 2010. His contract doesn’t expire until June 30, 2017.

An earlier version of this post misstated Collins’ current pay and prospective raise.

    This article relates to: Corrections, Education, Must Reads, School Finances, School Leadership

    Written by Ashly McGlone

    Ashly is an investigative reporter for Voice of San Diego. She can be reached at ashly.mcglone@voiceofsandiego.org or 619.550.5669.

    CAFT subscriber

    What I do not understand why the board members do not gain legal written opinions of these issues.  At least the board would be limiting there liability if they are wrong,  Or do they already know they are conducting themselves unlawfully in the first place, and do not care, since they make think they are above the law. 

    DavidM subscriber

    I find it appalling that any public employee can earn well into six figures, no matter what stage of his career.  For public education executives with contractual obligations for another school year the idea of a raise is even more disgusting.  But in the face of what appears to be a prima facie breach of his ethical obligations . . . words fail me.

    Christopher Garnier
    Christopher Garnier

    John Collins, Poway Unified School District Superintendent Negotiating Raises for District Managers — Including Himself?!?! 

    Board President, Michelle O'Connor-Ratcliff, allows Collins' continued, unscrupulous behavior!

    When will this man leave our community and stop robbing the taxpayers?