I go for a walk almost every morning. Just a block from our church, under the Commercial Avenue freeway overpass, I have to move to the middle of the street because the sidewalks are clogged with tents. The smell of human waste chokes the area.

Commentary - in-story logoThen, I head up 16th Street, where families are just waking up. Kids with their sleepy, messed-up hair tumble out of tents and veterans whose vouchers are useless in an overpriced, scarce rental market wander down the street. They rub shoulders with the whole range of mentally ill, addicted, alcoholic and recently evicted brothers and sisters who all start their day trying to organize their little sidewalk space.

In this short walk, I pass hundreds of the thousands who are forced to call the streets of San Diego home. It wasn’t always this way; it was much different when I came to Barrio Logan almost 20 years ago.

“Invest in conventions and tourism,” some of our city leaders are telling us. “Everybody wins.”

That’s not true. Study after study has shown that as you replace affordable homes in low-income communities with restaurants, hotels, a ballpark, parking and places for tourists and convention-goers to stay and spend their dollars, you displace people who live in those neighborhoods. In the areas adjacent to these new developments, you drive up the price of renting and draw down the stock of housing. In other words, in a short 20 years or so, you create a homeless crisis. Now, thousands of people are forced into the street and families must double or triple up in small apartments.

Mayor Kevin Faulconer’s latest attempt to help the thousands of people experiencing homelessness is yet another failure to recognize this basic economic reality. He proposes increasing the hotel tax, and two-thirds of the money generated from the tax hike would go toward expanding the San Diego Convention Center. The other third would be split between homeless services and street repairs.

We Stand Up for You. Will You Stand Up for Us?

That means less than 18 percent of the money raised from the additional tax would provide services to address the housing crisis and get people off the streets. The positive effect of that 18 percent will be overwhelmed by the damage that the growth of conventions and tourism will inflict on housing stock and housing prices.

Already in these few years, 10,000 units of inexpensive housing disappeared under redevelopment. Is it any wonder that 9,000 people are homeless in the county and thousands of families live cramped together because a single family cannot afford the rent? Redevelopment that will occur with the mayor’s plan will follow the gentrification and displacement that we have seen in the last 20 years.

The City Council already said no to the mayor by cutting the budget for the special election needed to put the plan in front of voters. But the mayor vetoed those changes and put the money for the special election back in the budget.

It’s no coincidence that special elections have a much lower turnout than general elections. With only a fraction of San Diego residents voting on the issue, it may be easier for wealthy stakeholders and insiders to make their voices heard, compared with low-income communities that already tend to experience lower turnout. And this plan, being pushed forth in a hurried fashion, is weak on a comprehensive vision for addressing homelessness.

Compare San Diego with Los Angeles on this issue: Last November, Los Angeles residents supported a measure to fund 10,000 new units of housing for homeless residents. Just this March, another Los Angeles measure increased the countywide sales tax to raise $3.5 billion for homeless services over the next 10 years. That city gets it: If you are going to support a tourist capital, you must mitigate the effects with substantial investment in affordable housing and homeless services.

To bring this kind of vision to San Diego, Faulconer’s proposal should be replaced with a new tax that exclusively supports affordable housing and homeless services. A coalition of labor unions, environmentalists and community organizing groups already has a measure in the works, and it seems promising. A new poll shows San Diegans are far more likely to approve a hotel tax hike focused exclusively on solving homelessness than Faulconer’s plan anyway.

The people who live on our streets deserve as much investment as those who prosper from tourism and conventions. Then, everyone will truly win.

I hope that in the 2018 general election, we can go into the voting booth with an opportunity to make a vision of love and dignity a reality for all families in San Diego.

Father John Auther is a pastor of Our Lady of Guadalupe Catholic Church and a leader in the San Diego Organizing Project. Auther’s commentary has been edited for style and clarity. See anything in there we should fact check? Tell us what to check out here.

    This article relates to: Homelessness, Housing, Opinion

    Written by Opinion

    Op-eds and Letters to the Editor on the issues that matter in San Diego. Have something to say? Submit a commentary.

    Joan Lockwood
    Joan Lockwood

    Here Here Lets separate the homeless issue, and therefore funding, from the inconvenience of tourists and conventioneers and in turn The Convention Center!  Its very revealing that these 2 are bound together- it certainly doesn't address the socio economic issues that  stress fixed income seniors and SSI recipients.  And Streets we have a street budget and I am VERY tired of listening to construction at all hours of the early morning.  Every gosh darn street is ripped up whether it has pot holes or not.  

    wadams92101 subscriber

    I agree with the sentiment if not necessarily with the premise.  I don't believe that conventions and tourism have been a major factor in the loss of affordable housing stock.  However, I think the problem lies more in the city's priorities by putting so much emphasis and subsidy into this industry.  If the City put as much focus and subsidy into inclusive economic development and higher education growth, it would also generate tax revenue for the city (sales, payroll, property taxes, and TOT) but would generate more jobs and more high paying jobs.  The UCSD / Torrey Pines Mesa land grants were perhaps the greatest economic moves the city ever made.   Universities have a high multiplier effect - some studies have shown 5 private sector jobs created for every one university job.  If we give this subsidy to the hoteliers, then we should give the Qualcomm land to SDSU, not FS Investors. 

    Carl Starrett
    Carl Starrett

    The proposed Convention Center expansion is on the waterfront on Port District land. You may disagree with the expansion proposal and you may disagree with the usage of the money, but there's really no need to make up facts or create straw man arguments. Does the proposed hotel tax increase propose demolition of any affordable house units? I've seen no evidence of that.

    mike johnson
    mike johnson subscriber

    Convention center and related industry supports a lot of ten dollar jobs. More important that the council focus on higher paying jobs. Such as high tech, biotect and education. We already have enough low paying tourist jobs.

    Pat Seaborg
    Pat Seaborg subscribermember

    We need to challenge the assumption of the hotel industry that because they are the collectors of the TOT, they should be able to say where the money goes. Visitors to San Diego pay the tax, and the hotel industry is merely the mechanism of collection. The money goes to the city, and the most pressing municipal needs of this community do not include an expanded convention center. Replacement of affordable housing lost to redevelopment is a far more pressing municipal need.

    bgetzel subscriber

    Pronouncements by those in the tourist industry that they would not support a measure that supports funding for homeless programs, unless it includes the convention center expansion, is reprehensible. How about being good citizens, help improve the city and have a little compassion for your fellow man? Besides, hotel managers have said that the homeless problem has caused visitors to say that they are unlikely to return. In other words - the homeless problem is also bad for business!

    Theresa Quiroz
    Theresa Quiroz subscriber

    Thank you for a great piece.  I think the best thing to do would be to remove all current TOT and TMD funding from the municipal code.  Set the TOT at 15.5%.  Put 4.5% to homeless issues, 4.5% to infrastructure, 4.5% to the General Fund and 2% to marketing the City.  It's not perfect but a lot better than is being proposed by the Mayor.