There is a debate going on in San Diego over the rights of street performers to entertain the public and earn a few bucks. The issues that San Diego artists face today are not new. Restrictions on public performances are common in many cities. There is a balance that needs to be reached by police, the city, business owners and performers. And all parties need to be responsible.
I’ve enjoyed a long career as a juggling act, which began with street performing in public venues around the world.
My twin brother and I began street performing at an early age. On weekends, we’d perform our juggling and comedy act for hundreds of visitors at the popular Harborplace Pavilion in the heart of Baltimore’s downtown tourist area. We passed the hat for up to four performances a day, earning money to help pay for college. But that didn’t come without paying our dues.
Harborplace, like many other tourist-centric venues, required street performers to apply, audition and get permitted. The competition was intense. There were performers who had been passing the hat for years in the city. But every performer was given a chance to be seen. It wasn’t a perfect system, but it provided for an organized, well thought-out entertainment program.
Washington Square Park is a popular place for tourists in New York City’s Greenwich Village. On fall weekends, the center fountain was turned off – which allowed the best street performers from around the city to perform “in the round” to enormous crowds. This was a first-come, first-served policy. Popular acts like Joey Joey and The Chinaman ruled the spot. As newcomers to the city during our freshmen year at New York University, we tried to break into the ranks. We showed up early – really early. No luck for the juggling twins. First-come, first-served just wasn’t respected. Longevity and seniority ruled that park.
We tried our hand at non-regulated street performing too, and that didn’t work out as well. We set up shop in front of the famous Atlas Statue at Rockefeller Plaza in New York. We drew a crowd so large that people passing by had to step into the street just to continue on their way. Not 15 minutes into our show, two police officers on mounted horses ordered us to stop. As kids, we pushed our luck and continued a bit. There were lots of cheers for us, boos for the cops, and ultimately, an abrupt end to our show.
Help Us Raise $100k By the End of May
I agree most with Mr. Karvounis' last paragraph; freedom of speech is a priority; we should be responsible citizens; we should respect our communities; and an open mind with constructive dialogue is absolutely key.
However, this article has various factual inacurracies in it that I would like to correct, and some opinions that should be explained, before we should accept phrases like "we can't tolerate".
I would finally like to add that I'm a big fan of Nick's juggling work :)
"It ensures artists are vetted, insured and safe for the general public."
Insurance is only needed for dangerous acts, no? I've not heard of any other public land requiring public liability insurance for a human statue or musician.
"Second, it ensures the city earns its fair share of income."
Busker programs are more costly to implement and run than you could morally make from licensing fees for street performers. The city would spend more than it makes.
"We can’t tolerate an artist selling arts and crafts on the street corner without a permit. If a nearby store is expected to pay a business license and sales tax on its products, then it’s only fair these artists do the same."
a) Selling a product and being a street performer are different (although I understand the two are generally being conflated in this fight).
b) It may be your view that buskers are "running a business", and therefore should be held to the same standards as any corporation, but it's not a view that federal courts share with you.
"It ensures a higher level of competence and compliance"
San Diego's permit isn't about quality. And if it were, it would be even less constitutional.
"At the same time, when every Tom, Dick and Harry is out in costume, without regulation, you could be standing next to a Dick who happens to be a pickpocket – not uncommon in tourist areas."
Are you making the case that "unlicensed busking" creates more opportunities for crime than licensed busking? The Met Police spokesperson has said the same on several occasions in London – and we found out they have no evidence for this claim.
"But street entertainers need to be managed appropriately so that the San Diego experience is positive for residents and visitors."
Places where you don't need a permit, which are still very fun for tourists: Trafalgar Square, New Orleans, Washington Square Park, Asheville... etc etc etc. Appropriate management can quite easily be done by street performers themselves, without the need for permit systems.
"With input from the American Civil Liberties Union, Las Vegas requires permits and regulates locations along Fremont Street Experience."
a) In Las Vegas, the ACLU prevented the Las Vegas ordinance from requiring auditioning or a fee.
b) The ACLU has also assertained in court (several times) that permit systems go against the constitution. http://www.buskersadvocates.org/images/SaintLouis/Buskerscomplaint.pdf
"New York City requires permits and limits performance locations"
Acutally, NYC's permit system:
a) only exists in the subway, and is entirely voluntary. You don't need to audition or get a license to perform anywhere in NYC....
b) ...unless you want amplification in the subway. Obviously the subway is a very dangerous place for public safety, so this kinda makes sense.
Both Pier 39 and Harborplace are privately managed land. You're talking about imposing a license on public managed land – there's a very big difference.
@Nick Broad I respect all street performers and thank Nick Broad on his ongoing advocacy of the business. We've connected outside of this forum and have discussed briefly our common interest, history, and passion for street performing.
Nick, I appreciate that you offer links to documentation of court cases, etc. Of course, I am fully aware that some city ordinances have been passed, and although they are local law, that doesn’t mean I agree with them. My positions are often different than standing law – I have offered my opinion, and not a dissertation of current law. The basis of my opinions is the argument that street performing is a business. And, the definition of business is “the practice of making one's living by engaging in commerce.”
Regarding Insurance: It would be wise for any city to require insurance for any person who “performs” on the street and solicits (directly or indirectly) money in exchange. The second it becomes a business, it should be regulated like any other business.
Regarding Income: The original story in Voice of San Diego references street vendors (like selling palm leaf arts) as street performers. Those types of “performers” (which I disagree with them about – they are vendors, not performers), should be permitted as a business, so that standard sales tax can be collected on sales. The income is not necessarily from the permit, but on sales.
I agree that street performers are different than vendors and should be permitted differently. Otherwise, I disagree. A street performer is a business – a sole proprietor earning money from a skill.
Regarding competence: A permit system would filter out those who are more competent enough to understand they are a business, and there are rules that need to be followed.
Regarding licensing: I believe that licensing is a process that decreases chances for crime and fraud. And vetting performers in costume, who are interacting with the general public, in my opinion, is a better option than no regulation at all.
I believe that in any city-managed park, the performers should be organized and managed by the city staff, just as food vendors need to be regulated.
I agree that NYC Subway is a controlled space and makes sense to regulate.
I agree that there is a difference between private venues that are managed and public spaces… but I believe that BOTH need regulation, permits, and licenses.
Thanks again Nick for your advocacy and support of the street performer industry.