The San Diego City Council voted unanimously this week to implement AB 551, a state law passed in 2013 that lets urban areas create “urban agriculture incentive zones” within which private landowners can secure a property tax reduction by committing their land to urban agriculture for at least five years.
This is a very welcome development. The benefits of urban agriculture are well established and include access to community gardens, revitalization of vacant lots, increased availability of fresh fruit and vegetables and healthy outdoor physical activity.
When most people think “agriculture” they probably picture rows of crops, barns, farm animals and raised beds in a school or community garden.
Agriculture by one definition is “the cultivation of animals, plants, fungi and other life forms for food, fiber, biofuel, medicinal and other products used to sustain and enhance human life.”
San Diego will benefit from an expansive interpretation of the word – one that includes growing healthy soil as an end in itself.
Setting up an urban farm or community garden is not easy. It takes resources, labor, money, time and commitment. And the return on investments can take a long time to materialize.
Help Us Raise $100k By the End of May
It is hard to avoid cognitive dissonance here. The pols are now supporting more water-intensive use of urban land, while at the same time penalizing people for using water? Wouldn't the pols have to exempt these plots from mandatory water cuts, because otherwise nothing would grow? And with respect to the GHG sequestration point, well, if that is the justification, then the supporters of this must also support the most effective GHG solution already in place - the lawn.
Like any other idea, I am agnostic provided that this thing pencils out, and doesn't represent another "good idea" that works only if the begging cup is filled over and over again by the taxpayers.
If this is a good idea, then let it stand or fall on its own merits.
This is amazing news. It's great to see that San Diego is finally recognizing the importance of urban farming and giving private property tax breaks for this. I am a resident of Ramona and plan to bring this measure to the Board of Supervisor's attention and maybe we can get this passed for our neighborhood up the hill as well! We own a little over half an acre and the majority of our property has been dedicated to edible landscaping. We applied for and received the incentive from the water district for replacing our grass with drought tolerant landscaping, We would love to receive a property tax break for the portion my land I've dedicated to urban farming as well. Way to go San Diego!
There are many benefits to urban farms but i wouldn't count improvements to air quality as one of those benefits. Weeds on a vacant lot provide comparable carbon sequestration to a garden and have denser biomass. Truck trips to and from home depot or the garden shop release more co2 than a garden can sequester. Tilling loosens and can make it go airborne in high winds and actually worsten air quality. Manure fertilizer isnt good for air quality either. That being said gardens look nice and provide practical benefits, but don't help increase the supply of available housing.
I lived in Seattle in the 1970's through early 80's. Around 1975 the city started a "Pea Patch" program on vacant city land. It instantly received wide-spread public support, and is still operating today. Besides providing food growing spaces for those with little or no yards attached to their residence, the patches are often beautiful additions to neighborhoods. The new San Diego program should be a big win for everyone.