The San Diego Regional Water Quality Board pushed off until next year a rule change that would allow copper and zinc to keep flowing through Chollas Creek.
The board is now also considering a new regulation that could cost businesses in the creek’s 25-square-mile watershed tens of thousands of dollars.
At what ended up being an all-day meeting, San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulconer lobbied the board to scale back a 2008 rule that limits the amount of copper and zinc allowed into the creek.
Those rules were meant to protect marine life, but they were based on inadequate science. Even the board’s chairman, Henry Abarbanel, said the existing metals limits are “unscientific and random.”
The metals limit is wildly expensive: San Diego and surrounding cities said they would have to spend $2.1 billion to comply. If the rules are eased, the city of San Diego alone would save about $880 million.
But the city, which has been working to ease the rules for most of this decade, must wait a bit longer.
Support Independent Journalism Today
Why do these "environmental attorneys" always have to get into the act? Marco Gonzalez, like his buddies Pease and Briggs, is only out to make a buck off whatever agency or business he can. These sharks are nothing more than extortionists. They remind me of the Pharisees in the Bible, straining at gnats and swallowing camels. I never see these guys suggesting something feasible, only threats of lawsuits.
Let's help Atty Rosenbaum's clients and business owners whose activity dumps toxic chemicals to move away from the creek. We need stringent restrictions on any activity which threatens the watershed, bay, or the ocean. Chollas Creek is a very long area and provides jobs to the communities through which it passes. It's entire banks do not need to be a park, but other types of businesses are a welcome part of the community.
A federal judge in New Orleans, hopefully soon, will decide on a lawsuit, filed five years ago, demanding EPA to regulate 'nutrient pollution' on a national level. Nutrient (fertilizer) pollution originates from different sources, now mostly blamed on the runoffs from farms and cities, but what the public does not know is the best kept national secrete, that EPA never implemented the CWA, because it used an essential test (BOD) incorrect and not only ignored 60% of this oxygen exerting waste, but all the nitrogenous (urine and protein) waste, while this waste, like fecal waste exerts an oxygen demand, but also is a fertilizer for algae. By calling this waste now a nutrient and blaming it mostly on farmers, the public has been successfully kept in the dark.
Therefore no more new regulations or lawsuits until EPA first acknowledges three major sources of nutrient pollution, that are presently ignored.
1. The lack of nitrogenous (urine and protein) waste treatment in municipal sewage, due to a faulty test and also causes nutrient pollution. Wp.me/p5COh2-2C
2. Septic tanks do not treat sewage, they only solubilize sewage so it can get into groundwater.
3. The impact of 'green'rain' or rain containing reactive nitrogen (fertilizer), the result of the burning of fossil fuels, the increased use if synthesized fertilizer and increased frequency of lightning storms, the result of global climate change.